Birth and Delivery Cesarean Birth

Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries

Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Thom EA, Moawad AH, Caritis SN, Harper M, Wapner RJ, Sorokin Y, Miodovnik M, Carpenter M, Peaceman AM, O'Sullivan MJ, Sibai B, Langer O, Thorp JM, Ramin SM, Mercer BM

Published June 2006 Obstetrics & Gynecology
DOI 10.1097/01.AOG.0000219750.79480.84 PMID 16738145

Abstract

Objective

Although repeat cesarean deliveries often are associated with serious morbidity, they account for only a portion of abdominal deliveries and are overlooked when evaluating morbidity. Our objective was to estimate the magnitude of increased maternal morbidity associated with increasing number of cesarean deliveries.

Methods

Prospective observational cohort of 30,132 women who had cesarean delivery without labor in 19 academic centers over 4 years (1999-2002).

Results

There were 6,201 first (primary), 15,808 second, 6,324 third, 1,452 fourth, 258 fifth, and 89 sixth or more cesarean deliveries. The risks of placenta accreta, cystotomy, bowel injury, ureteral injury, and ileus, the need for postoperative ventilation, intensive care unit admission, hysterectomy, and blood transfusion requiring 4 or more units, and the duration of operative time and hospital stay significantly increased with increasing number of cesarean deliveries. Placenta accreta was present in 15 (0.24%), 49 (0.31%), 36 (0.57%), 31 (2.13%), 6 (2.33%), and 6 (6.74%) women undergoing their first, second, third, fourth, fifth, and sixth or more cesarean deliveries, respectively. Hysterectomy was required in 40 (0.65%) first, 67 (0.42%) second, 57 (0.90%) third, 35 (2.41%) fourth, 9 (3.49%) fifth, and 8 (8.99%) sixth or more cesarean deliveries. In the 723 women with previa, the risk for placenta accreta was 3%, 11%, 40%, 61%, and 67% for first, second, third, fourth, and fifth or more repeat cesarean deliveries, respectively.

Conclusion

Because serious maternal morbidity increases progressively with increasing number of cesarean deliveries, the number of intended pregnancies should be considered during counseling regarding elective repeat cesarean operation versus a trial of labor and when debating the merits of elective primary cesarean delivery.

Level of Evidence

II-2.

Read the guide

Topics

By this author

Related research

Birth and Delivery › Cesarean Birth › Cesarean Recovery and Scar
Robert M Silver, Mark B Landon, Dwight J Rouse, Kenneth J Leveno, Catherine Y Spong, Elizabeth A Thom, Atef H Moawad, Steve N Caritis, Margaret Harper, Ronald J Wapner, Yoram Sorokin, Menachem Miodovnik, Marshall Carpenter, Alan M Peaceman, Mary J O'Sullivan, Baha Sibai, Oded Langer, John M Thorp, Susan M Ramin, Brian M Mercer
Bob Silver, Rob Silver, Bobby Silver, R Silver, M Landon, D Rouse, Ken Leveno, K Leveno, Cathy Spong, Kate Spong, C Spong, Liz Thom, Beth Thom, Betsy Thom, E Thom, A Moawad, Stephen Caritis, Steven Caritis, S Caritis, Maggie Harper, Peggy Harper, M Harper, Ron Wapner, R Wapner, Y Sorokin, M Miodovnik, M Carpenter, A Peaceman, M O'Sullivan, B Sibai, O Langer, Jack Thorp, J Thorp, Sue Ramin, S Ramin, B Mercer
PMID 16738145 16738145 DOI 10.1097/01.AOG.0000219750.79480.84 10.1097/01.AOG.0000219750.79480.84 Silver et al. 2006, Silver 2006