Sauer, M. V. (1998). Motherhood at any age? Egg donation was not intended for everyone. Fertility and Sterility, 69(2), 187-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(97)00546-3
Sauer MV. Motherhood at any age? Egg donation was not intended for everyone. Fertil Steril. 1998;69(2):187-188. doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(97)00546-3
Sauer, M. V. "Motherhood at any age? Egg donation was not intended for everyone." Fertility and Sterility, vol. 69, no. 2, 1998, pp. 187-188.
For EndNote, Zotero or Mendeley:
License
No open license is recorded for this paper. Reuse terms are set by the publisher.
An IVF Doctor Explains Why Egg Donation Has Age Limits
In a 1998 opinion piece, an IVF doctor (reproductive endocrinologist) writes about a 63-year-old woman who had a baby using donor eggs. He had treated her years before, when she lied about her age to join his program. He argues egg donation was not meant to be offered at any age.
Key Findings
The author set his own program's upper age limit at 55. He says he chose that number himself during an ethics board review. It did not come from formal research.
He writes that patients lied about their age to enter the program, first when the limit was 40, then again at 50.
Citing earlier case series of older oocyte-donation patients, he reports gestational hypertension in up to one in three, and preterm labor in about one in five.
At the time of writing, fewer than 100 births to mothers over 50 had been reported in the medical literature.
Interpretation
The piece is a signed opinion column. It is not a new study. The column has no new patient group and no control group. The complication numbers come from earlier case series of older women who had children through egg donation. The author calls these results preliminary. He does not call them confirmed rates. The piece is one doctor's judgment about where reproductive technology should stop. The journal states that opinions in this column belong to the author alone.
RRM Context
The piece comes from inside the IVF field. The author helped pioneer egg donation for older women, then spoke out against extending it without limit. He frames pregnancy after menopause as a technology bypassing the body's own limits. He does not frame it as treatment for a diagnosed cause of infertility. That question, what a treatment actually fixes versus bypasses, sits at the center of restorative reproductive medicine (RRM).
Our editorial summary of this paper, not the article's abstract.
Yamada R et al., 2024·Journal of internal medicine·Free to read
Cardiovascular disease is a major cause of maternal mortality, but the extent to which infertility treatment is implicated in heart disease remains unclear. To evaluate the association between infertility treatment and postpartum heart disease. We designed a retrospective cohort study of patients who delivered in the United States between 2010 and 2018. The primary outcome was hospitalization within 12-month post-delivery due to heart disease (including ischemic heart disease, atherosclerotic heart disease, cardiomyopathy, hypertensive disease, heart failure, and cardiac dysrhythmias). We estimated the rate difference (RD) of hospitalizations among patients who conceived with infertility treatment and those who conceived spontaneously. Associations were expressed as hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), derived from Cox proportional hazards regression after adjustment for potential confounders. Infertility treatment was recorded in 0.9% (n = 287,813) of 31,339,991 deliveries. Rates of heart disease hospitalizations with infertility treatment and with spontaneous conception were 550 and 355 per 100,000, respectively (RD 195, 95% CI: 143-247; adjusted HR 1.99, 95% CI: 1.80-2.20). The most important increase in risk was observed for hypertensive disease (adjusted HR 2.16, 95% CI: 1.92-2.42). This increased risk was apparent as early as 30-day post-delivery (HR 1.61, 95% CI: 1.39-1.86), with progressively increasing risk up to a year. Although the absolute risk of postpartum heart disease hospitalization is low, infertility treatment is associated with an increased risk, especially for hypertensive disease. These findings highlight the importance of timely postpartum follow-ups in patients who received infertility treatment.
Sachdev D et al., 2023·JAMA network open·Free full text on PubMed Central
Stroke accounts for 7% of pregnancy-related deaths in the US. As the use of infertility treatment is increasing, many studies have sought to characterize the association of infertility treatment with the risk of stroke with mixed results. To evaluate the risk of hospitalization from hemorrhagic and ischemic strokes in patients who underwent infertility treatment. DESIGN, SETTING, This population-based, retrospective cohort study used data abstracted from the Nationwide Readmissions Database, which stores data from all-payer hospital inpatient stays from 28 states across the US, from 2010 and 2018. Eligible participants included individuals aged 15 to 54 who had a hospital delivery from January to November in a given calendar year, and any subsequent hospitalizations from January to December in the same calendar year of delivery during the study period. Statistical analysis was performed between November 2022 and April 2023. Hospital delivery after infertility treatment (ie, intrauterine insemination, assisted reproductive technology, fertility preservation procedures, or use of a gestational carrier) or after spontaneous conception. The primary outcome was hospitalization for nonfatal stroke (either ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke) within the first calendar year after delivery. Secondary outcomes included risk of stroke hospitalization at less than 30 days, less than 60 days, less than 90 days, and less than 180 days post partum. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate associations, which were expressed as hazard ratios (HRs), adjusted for confounders. Effect size estimates were corrected for biases due to exposure misclassification, selection, and unmeasured confounding through a probabilistic bias analysis. Of 31 339 991 patients, 287 813 (0.9%; median [IQR] age, 32.1 [28.5-35.8] years) underwent infertility treatment and 31 052 178 (99.1%; median [IQR] age, 27.7 [23.1-32.0] years) delivered after spontaneous conception. The rate of stroke hospitalization within 12 months of delivery was 37 hospitalizations per 100 000 people (105 patients) among those who received infertility treatment and 29 hospitalizations per 100 000 people (9027 patients) among those who delivered after spontaneous conception (rate difference, 8 hospitalizations per 100 000 people; 95% CI, -6 to 21 hospitalizations per 100 000 people; HR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.17 to 2.35). The risk of hospitalization for hemorrhagic stroke (adjusted HR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.13 to 3.61) was greater than that for ischemic stroke (adjusted HR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.01 to 2.39). The risk of stroke hospitalization increased as the time between delivery and hospitalization for stroke increased, particularly for hemorrhagic strokes. In general, these associations became larger for hemorrhagic stroke and smaller for ischemic stroke following correction for biases. In this cohort study, infertility treatment was associated with an increased risk of stroke-related hospitalization within 12 months of delivery; this risk was evident as early as 30 days after delivery. Timely follow-up in the immediate days post partum and continued long-term follow-up should be considered to mitigate stroke risk.
Progesterone, supplied in a variety of formulations, is commonly used in assisted reproduction. However, even the commonly accepted uses of progesterone in fertility care are believed to be largely empirical, as are the current available treatment options. While a critical balance of estrogen and progesterone is necessary for successful embryo implantation, achieving that balance is subject to differences in prescribing practice. In evaluating recommendations for the use of progesterone, discussion of its role in assisted-reproduction procedures must distinguish between known therapeutic benefits and empirical benefits.
There is a growing threat to the practice of oocyte donation in the United States and all of us should take careful notice. This threat is posed by the escalating fees paid to young women for providing these services. I was shocked by the decision of St. Barnabas Medical Center in Livingston, New Jersey to double the compensation from the community standard of $2,500 to a startling $5,000 per cycle. These new fees were aggressively advertised throughout New Jersey and Manhattan in strategic periodicals, newspapers, and magazines. I was even more dismayed to see physicians and “ethicists” justifying the increase to the media (1) stating “there is nothing inherently wrong with bidding for human eggs.”
For years, I have advocated compensation to oocyte donors based upon time, effort, and risk of involvement. I have addressed this topic at speaking engagements and in position papers, typically defending the belief that physicians are capable of responsible restraint (2, 3). However, I have been increasingly concerned over the encroachment upon the traditional practice by both commercial enterprises and physician-led groups who have inflated the cost of donor compensation 500% in the past decade.
In most countries it is illegal to provide any compensation for oocyte donors. Many believe payment is inappropriate and many more agree that excessive compensation is ethically unacceptable, since it potentially exploits or even coerces young women to participate. Even if one considers the time spent traveling to the local office and waiting for an ultrasound exam to be “work,” donors now will be earning in excess of $300 per hour. I find it hard to believe that anyone thinks this “reasonable compensation” according to the recommendations of the Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (4).
If we are truly not guilty of “pimping for patients” (5) and if donors are not “selling eggs,” then we cannot justify another doubling of the compensation. I believe this is a flagrant violation of the Ethical Considerations of Assisted Reproductive Technologies issued in 1994 (4). What is most disappointing is that this violation comes from a highly respected group led by physicians held in esteem within our subspecialty, who stated in The New York Times “I’m not sure $5,000 is enough.” (1) I would ask them, “How much is enough?” Where does this stop and at what price to our patients and our profession? Inevitably, all of us will be forced to raise our compensation rates to meet this challenge. Most importantly, and most unfortunately, these expenses will have to be passed on directly to our patients, who are already spending considerable sums of money to seek this procedure.
I have always opposed government regulation and intervention, and I have often taken a public stand in defending our right to administer our own practices. However, for the first time in my career I am rethinking my position. If physicians are forced to drastically modify their practices to keep pace with commercial ventures or to compete with doctors whose modus operandi is “what the market will bear,” an approach to medicine so flagrantly greedy as to threaten the existence of the field, then I do believe it is time for regulation. These are truly sad events, and if we stand by and allow these changes to become standard operating procedure then we as professionals deserve the public criticism that will inevitably follow.
Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, 2016·Fertility and sterility
Advanced reproductive age (ARA) is a risk factor for female infertility, pregnancy loss, fetal anomalies, stillbirth, and obstetric complications. Oocyte donation reverses the age-related decline in implantation and birth rates of women in their 40s and 50s and restores pregnancy potential beyond menopause. However, obstetrical complications in older patients remain high, particularly related to operative delivery and hypertensive and cardiovascular risks. Physicians should perform a thorough medical evaluation designed to assess the physical fitness of a patient for pregnancy before deciding to attempt transfer of embryos to any woman of advanced reproductive age (>45 years). Embryo transfer should be strongly discouraged or denied to women of ARA with underlying conditions that increase or exacerbate obstetrical risks. Because of concerns related to the high-risk nature of pregnancy, as well as longevity, treatment of women over the age of 55 should generally be discouraged. This statement replaces the earlier ASRM Ethics Committee document of the same name, last published in 2013 (Fertil Steril 2013;100:337-40).
Haimes E et al., 2012·Sociology of Health & Illness·Free full text on PubMed Central
AbstractThere is a growing global demand for human eggs for the treatment of sub‐fertile women and for stem cell‐related research. This demand provokes concerns for the women providing the eggs, including their possible exploitation, whether they should be paid, whether they can give properly informed consent and whether their eggs and bodies are becoming commodified. However, few of the debates have benefitted from insights from the women themselves. We address this gap in knowledge by reporting on a study investigating women’s views and experiences of a scheme in which they can volunteer, in their capacity as fertility patients, to ‘share’ their eggs with researchers and receive a reduction in in vitro fertilisation fees. We focus our discussion on the question of exploitation, a concept central to many sociological and ethical interests. In brief, our analysis suggests that while interviewees acknowledge the potential of this scheme to be exploitative, they argue that this is not the case, emphasising their ability to act autonomously in deciding to volunteer. Nonetheless, these freely made decisions do not necessarily take place under circumstances of their choosing. We discuss the implications of this for egg provision in general and for understandings of exploitation.
Today in vitro fertilisation (IVF) is a widespread and important technique of reproductive medicine. When the technique was first used, it was considered ethically controversial. This is the first study conducted of adult IVF-offspring in order to learn about their ethical opinions and personal attitudes towards this medical technology. We recruited the participants from the first cases of in vitro fertilisation in Germany at the Gynaecological Clinic of the University Hospital Erlangen. Our qualitative interview study consisted of in-depth, face-to-face interviews with 16 adults who had been conceived by IVF. Our data was analysed with methods of Grounded Theory. For these adults, the most important factor influencing their personal attitudes towards IVF was the knowledge that they were deeply wanted children. The artificiality of their conception seemed irrelevant for their ethical opinion. All participants mentioned that it was important for them to be informed about the circumstances of their conception by their parents. IVF seems to be a medical technique which, although it affects intimate aspects of human existence, can be integrated into the lives of the affected persons without any great difficulties. The findings suggest that parents should inform their children about their fertilisation at an early age and as part of a process over time, not only on a single occasion. Physicians should advise IVF-parents accordingly.
To report the occurrence of an unusual case of successful pregnancy achieved by oocyte donation in a woman > 60 years of age. Case report. University-based assisted reproductive technology program. PATIENT(S): Sixty-three-year old nulligravida, married for 16 years to her 60-year-old husband. Throughout her infertility treatment, the patient was believed to be 10 years younger, as she claimed. She revealed her true age of 63 only upon being referred for obstetric care at 13 weeks of gestational age. INTERVENTION(S): Oocyte donation, IVF, embryo cryopreservation, and ET. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Attainment of pregnancy and subsequent delivery. RESULT(S): The patient underwent two cycles of oocyte donation. During the second attempt, the fresh transfer resulted in a clinical miscarriage at approximately 8 weeks of gestational age. A subsequent transfer of three frozen-thawed embryos resulted in an ongoing singleton gestation. The pregnancy was complicated by gestational diabetes (controlled by diet) and mild pregnancy-induced hypertension. Delivery by cesarean section at 38 weeks of gestational age resulted in the birth of a healthy female infant weighing 2,844 g with Apgar scores of 9 and 9. CONCLUSION(S): This case demonstrates that the uterus is capable of supporting nidation and subsequent gestation for many years beyond natural menopause. It shows that other aspects of human physiology are capable of adapting to the stresses and changes of pregnancy sufficiently well to achieve a normal birth at the age of 63 years. This case also exemplifies the difficulty in attempting to regulate the age of recipients in oocyte donation. As in other aspects of human life, when age limits are applied to the provision of certain services, human beings whose age falls outside of these limits become motivated to deceive the providers of those services to avail themselves of the services.
Ethics and Policy › Reproductive Ethics › Access to Treatment · Assisted Reproduction › Donor Gametes and Surrogacy › Egg Donation · Birth and Delivery › Birth Outcomes › Maternal Morbidity
PMID 9496326 9496326 DOI 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)00546-3 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)00546-3 Sauer et al. 1998, Sauer 1998
Cite this article
Sauer, M. V. (1998). Motherhood at any age? Egg donation was not intended for everyone. Fertility and Sterility, 69(2), 187-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(97)00546-3
Sauer MV. Motherhood at any age? Egg donation was not intended for everyone. Fertil Steril. 1998;69(2):187-188. doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(97)00546-3
Sauer, M. V. "Motherhood at any age? Egg donation was not intended for everyone." Fertility and Sterility, vol. 69, no. 2, 1998, pp. 187-188.
Keywords
Age Factors, Female, Fertilization in Vitro/legislation & Jurisprudence/psychology, Humans, Middle Aged, Mothers/psychology, Oocyte Donation/legislation & Jurisprudence/psychology, Pregnancy/psychology
00hj8s172