Lifestyle and Environment · Nutrition and Metabolic Health

Omega-3 fatty acid addition during pregnancy

Middleton P, Gomersall JC, Gould JF, Shepherd E, Olsen SF, Makrides M

Published November 15, 2018 The Cochrane database of systematic reviews
DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD003402.pub3 PMID 30480773 PMC PMC6516961

RRM Academy Synopsis

Omega-3 fatty acids in pregnancy lower the risk of preterm birth

Omega-3 fatty acids lowered the risk of preterm birth by 11% in a Cochrane review of 70 randomized trials with 19,927 pregnant women. About 12 out of 100 with omega-3 delivered before 37 weeks, against about 13 out of 100 without. Early preterm birth before 34 weeks was 42% less common. Omega-3 probably made pregnancies beyond 42 weeks more common.

Key Findings

  • Preterm birth before 37 weeks was less common with omega-3, 11.9% against 13.4% (risk ratio 0.89, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.97; 26 trials with 10,304 participants; high-quality evidence).
  • Early preterm birth before 34 weeks was less common with omega-3, 2.7% against 4.6% (risk ratio 0.58, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.77; 9 trials with 5204 participants; high-quality evidence).
  • Prolonged pregnancy beyond 42 weeks was probably more common with omega-3, 2.6% against 1.6% (risk ratio 1.61, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.33; 6 trials with 5141 participants; moderate-quality evidence).
  • Low birthweight was less common with omega-3, 14% against 15.6% (risk ratio 0.90, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.99; 15 trials with 8449 participants; high-quality evidence).
  • Perinatal death was possibly lower with omega-3 (risk ratio 0.75, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.03; 10 trials with 7416 participants; moderate-quality evidence).

Interpretation

The review pools randomized trials, which the authors call the most reliable kind of trial. They rate the evidence for both preterm birth results as high quality. Fifty trials tested supplements and three tested food or dietary additions, mostly in upper-middle or high-income countries. Children's development and growth showed very few differences between groups, based on mostly low or very low quality evidence. The authors reran the analysis with 24 trials at low risk of selection and performance bias. For preterm birth before 37 weeks the estimate was similar to the main result (risk ratio 0.92, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.02) but lost conventional statistical significance.

RRM Context

RRM looks for causes of pregnancy problems that can be changed, and nutrition is one candidate. Many pregnant women eat fish infrequently, the review notes, and its trials test whether adding omega-3 changes outcomes such as preterm birth. The review gives preterm birth the highest burden of death and illness among the complications it lists. Cause-based care asks the same question before conception.

Abstract

Background

Higher intakes of foods containing omega-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (LCPUFA), such as fish, during pregnancy have been associated with longer gestations and improved perinatal outcomes. This is an update of a review that was first published in 2006.

Objectives

To assess the effects of omega-3 LCPUFA, as supplements or as dietary additions, during pregnancy on maternal, perinatal, and neonatal outcomes and longer-term outcomes for mother and child.

Search Methods

For this update, we searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (16 August 2018), and reference lists of retrieved studies.

Selection Criteria

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing omega-3 fatty acids (as supplements or as foods, stand-alone interventions, or with a co-intervention) during pregnancy with placebo or no omega-3, and studies or study arms directly comparing omega-3 LCPUFA doses or types. Trials published in abstract form were eligible for inclusion.

Data Collection and Analysis

Two review authors independently assessed study eligibility, extracted data, assessed risk of bias in trials and assessed quality of evidence for prespecified birth/infant, maternal, child/adult and health service outcomes using the GRADE approach.

Main Results

In this update, we included 70 RCTs (involving 19,927 women at low, mixed or high risk of poor pregnancy outcomes) which compared omega-3 LCPUFA interventions (supplements and food) compared with placebo or no omega-3. Overall study-level risk of bias was mixed, with selection and performance bias mostly at low risk, but there was high risk of attrition bias in some trials. Most trials were conducted in upper-middle or high-income countries; and nearly half the trials included women at increased/high risk for factors which might increase the risk of adverse maternal and birth outcomes.Preterm birth < 37 weeks (13.4% versus 11.9%; risk ratio (RR) 0.89, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81 to 0.97; 26 RCTs, 10,304 participants; high-quality evidence) and early preterm birth < 34 weeks (4.6% versus 2.7%; RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.77; 9 RCTs, 5204 participants; high-quality evidence) were both lower in women who received omega-3 LCPUFA compared with no omega-3. Prolonged gestation > 42 weeks was probably increased from 1.6% to 2.6% in women who received omega-3 LCPUFA compared with no omega-3 (RR 1.61 95% CI 1.11 to 2.33; 5141 participants; 6 RCTs; moderate-quality evidence).For infants, there was a possibly reduced risk of perinatal death (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.03; 10 RCTs, 7416 participants; moderate-quality evidence: 62/3715 versus 83/3701 infants) and possibly fewer neonatal care admissions (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.03; 9 RCTs, 6920 participants; moderate-quality evidence - 483/3475 infants versus 519/3445 infants). There was a reduced risk of low birthweight (LBW) babies (15.6% versus 14%; RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.99; 15 trials, 8449 participants; high-quality evidence); but a possible small increase in large-for-gestational age (LGA) babies (RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.36; 6 RCTs, 3722 participants; moderate-quality evidence, for omega-3 LCPUFA compared with no omega-3. Little or no difference in small-for-gestational age or intrauterine growth restriction (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.13; 8 RCTs, 6907 participants; moderate-quality evidence) was seen.For the maternal outcomes, there is insufficient evidence to determine the effects of omega-3 on induction post-term (average RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.22 to 2.98; 3 trials, 2900 participants; low-quality evidence), maternal serious adverse events (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.40 to 2.72; 2 trials, 2690 participants; low-quality evidence), maternal admission to intensive care (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.12 to 2.63; 2 trials, 2458 participants; low-quality evidence), or postnatal depression (average RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.77; 2 trials, 2431 participants; low-quality evidence). Mean gestational length was greater in women who received omega-3 LCPUFA (mean difference (MD) 1.67 days, 95% CI 0.95 to 2.39; 41 trials, 12,517 participants; moderate-quality evidence), and pre-eclampsia may possibly be reduced with omega-3 LCPUFA (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.01; 20 trials, 8306 participants; low-quality evidence).For the child/adult outcomes, very few differences between antenatal omega-3 LCPUFA supplementation and no omega-3 were observed in cognition, IQ, vision, other neurodevelopment and growth outcomes, language and behaviour (mostly low-quality to very low-quality evidence). The effect of omega-3 LCPUFA on body mass index at 19 years (MD 0, 95% CI -0.83 to 0.83; 1 trial, 243 participants; very low-quality evidence) was uncertain. No data were reported for development of diabetes in the children of study participants.

Authors' Conclusions

In the overall analysis, preterm birth < 37 weeks and early preterm birth < 34 weeks were reduced in women receiving omega-3 LCPUFA compared with no omega-3. There was a possibly reduced risk of perinatal death and of neonatal care admission, a reduced risk of LBW babies; and possibly a small increased risk of LGA babies with omega-3 LCPUFA.For our GRADE quality assessments, we assessed most of the important perinatal outcomes as high-quality (e.g. preterm birth) or moderate-quality evidence (e.g. perinatal death). For the other outcome domains (maternal, child/adult and health service outcomes) GRADE ratings ranged from moderate to very low, with over half rated as low. Reasons for downgrading across the domain were mostly due to design limitations and imprecision.Omega-3 LCPUFA supplementation during pregnancy is an effective strategy for reducing the incidence of preterm birth, although it probably increases the incidence of post-term pregnancies. More studies comparing omega-3 LCPUFA and placebo (to establish causality in relation to preterm birth) are not needed at this stage. A further 23 ongoing trials are still to report on over 5000 women, so no more RCTs are needed that compare omega-3 LCPUFA against placebo or no intervention. However, further follow-up of completed trials is needed to assess longer-term outcomes for mother and child, to improve understanding of metabolic, growth and neurodevelopment pathways in particular, and to establish if, and how, outcomes vary by different types of omega-3 LCPUFA, timing and doses; or by characteristics of women.

Topics

By this author

Related research

Lifestyle and Environment › Nutrition and Metabolic Health › Dietary Patterns · Birth and Delivery › Birth Outcomes › Maternal Morbidity · Pregnancy › Prenatal Care › Nutrition in Pregnancy
Philippa Middleton, Judith C Gomersall, Jacqueline F Gould, Emily Shepherd, Sjurdur Frodi Olsen, Maria Makrides
P Middleton, J Gomersall, J Gould, E Shepherd, S Olsen, M Makrides
PMID 30480773 30480773 DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD003402.pub3 10.1002/14651858.CD003402.pub3 Middleton et al. 2018, Middleton 2018