Reproductive Surgery · Ovarian Surgery

Ovarian resection for the relief of sterility

Meaker SR

Published July 1950 Fertility and Sterility, 1(4), 293-305
DOI 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)30240-0 PMID 15435593
Read our synopsis

RRM Academy Synopsis

Ovarian resection was followed by pregnancy in 35 of 50 women

In this 1950 case series of 65 women with ovarian cysts, 35 of 50 infertile women followed after ovarian surgery became pregnant. The surgeon reports no comparison group. Of 38 women with missing or rare periods, 26 began regular cycles.

Key Findings

  • Of 50 women with sterility who could be followed, 35 became pregnant. The first conception came about five months after operation, on average.
  • The 50 women followed had 48 recorded pregnancies: 5 miscarriages, 42 normal deliveries, and 1 pregnancy approaching full term.
  • Among 38 women with amenorrhea followed for one to several years, 26 established regular and normal menstrual behavior, and 4 others became notably better.
  • Of the 65 operated women, 53 had sterility, 39 had amenorrhea and 4 had menometrorrhagia; some reported more than one complaint.

Interpretation

One surgeon reports his own cases from 22 years, and reports no comparison group. Diagnosis relied on symptoms and a pelvic exam, sometimes repeated under anesthesia. The author reports the preoperative diagnosis was confirmed. Three of the 53 women with sterility went uncounted: one disappeared, one developed tubal infection, and one had just been operated on. The results describe women with this clinical picture. The author says why surgery works is uncertain and suggests it relieves pressure inside the ovary. Discussants report similar results in their own series.

RRM Context

The paper dates from 1950. Its polycystic ovary picture is now called PCOS (polycystic ovary syndrome), renamed PMOS (Polyendocrine Metabolic Ovarian Syndrome) in 2026. The author asks why these ovaries work poorly and operates on them. Restorative reproductive medicine also seeks the cause of missed ovulation. Current methods differ.

Abstract

More than twenty-five years ago Edward Reynolds gave an excellent description of the polycystic ovary, and expressed the opinion that ovarian surgery was the most important single feature in the treatment of sterility of the female. This view was not accepted by later workers in the field. Indeed, the tendency has been to consider retention cysts as items of small importance, unlikely to cause symptoms and rarely calling for treatment on their own account. It remained for Stein15- 18 and his followers to define a type of case where the presence of multiple cysts evidently interferes both with ovulation and with endocrine activity, and to show that surgery frequently succeeds in restoring normal function. I propose to discuss certain aspects of this clinical problem, and to report my own series of 65 operated cases. The fundamental cause of retention cysts is probably, as Zondek believes, a phase of hypergonadotropism. Under normal conditions large numbers of primordial follicles start to mature but never complete the process. At some point along the way the ova die, whereupon the follicles regress and ultimately become insignificant corpora fibrosa. Under the influence of excessive pituitary stimulation, however, such follicles may continue to secrete liquor and to grow after the disappearance of their ova. Some of them eliminate themselves by delayed resorption and atrophy or, less often, by rupturing through the tunica albuginea. Others remain as permanent cystic structures. These retention cysts are pathologic, whereas atretic follicles in various stages of regression represent nothing more than phases of the normal ovulatory cycle.

Topics

Related research

Reproductive Surgery › Ovarian Surgery › Cystectomy Technique · PMOS / PCOS › Surgical Treatment › Ovarian Wedge Resection
PMID 15435593 15435593 DOI 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)30240-0 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)30240-0 Meaker et al. 1950, Meaker 1950

Cite this article

Meaker, S. R. (1950). Ovarian resection for the relief of sterility. Fertility and sterility, 1(4), 293-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)30240-0