Diagnostics Hormone Testing

Ovarian reserve does not influence natural conception: insights from infertile women

Galati G, Reschini M, Chine' A, Benaglia L, Vigano' P, Somigliana E, Vercellini P, Muzii L

Published November 2024 Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 310(5), 2691-2696
DOI 10.1007/s00404-024-07741-6 PMID 39340554 PMC PMC11485058

RRM Academy Synopsis

Low ovarian reserve was no more common in unexplained infertility

Low AMH was no more common in unexplained infertility than in male-factor infertility. An Italian retrospective study compared 252 women in each group. Low AMH, a blood marker of egg supply, appeared in about 10 out of 100 and 14 out of 100 women, respectively.

Key Findings

  • The study included 252 women with unexplained infertility and 252 women with male infertility, matched by age and study period.
  • The main result was low AMH in 26 women with unexplained infertility (10%) and 35 with male infertility (14%), p = 0.28.
  • The adjusted odds ratio for infertility in women with low AMH was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.44–1.33).
  • At the pre-specified antral follicle count and FSH thresholds, the two groups showed no significant differences.
  • One stricter AMH cutoff differed: 12 (5%) women with unexplained infertility against 25 (10%) with male infertility (adjusted OR 0.44, 95% CI: 0.21–0.91). The authors suggest chance.

Interpretation

This retrospective cohort study followed 252 women with unexplained infertility. The researchers compared them to 252 women whose partners had severe male infertility. The study ran at one Milan infertility clinic from 2014 to 2020. The male-infertility group stood in for fertile women. The authors note that mild endometriosis could have gone undetected on ultrasound. The authors call for larger studies at more than one site to confirm these findings.

RRM Context

Two earlier large studies, with 1202 and 981 women, also found no link between AMH and natural pregnancy, the authors report. AMH reflects how many eggs remain. Restorative reproductive medicine treats unexplained infertility as undiagnosed. It looks for the cause in both partners. A low AMH value alone does not explain why conception has not happened.

Abstract

Purpose

There is several albeit not univocal evidence suggesting that ovarian reserve is not related to the chance of natural pregnancy, provided that the remnant follicular pool is sufficient to ensure regular menstrual cycles. Nevertheless, available studies have some methodological limitations, and the issue cannot be considered definitively ascertained.

Methods

To further address this issue, we retrospectively selected infertile women whose infertility diagnostic work-up was unremarkable (unexplained infertility-cases) and matched them by age and study period to a group of infertile women who were diagnosed with severe male infertility (controls). If ovarian reserve impacts on natural fertility, one had to expect lower ovarian reserve among women with unexplained infertility. Tested biomarkers included AMH, AFC and day 2-3 serum FSH. The primary aim was the frequency of women with serum AMH < 0.7 ng/ml.

Results

Two-hundred fifty-two women with unexplained infertility and 252 women with male infertility were included. All biomarkers of ovarian reserve did not differ between the study groups. AMH levels < 0.7 ng/mL were observed in 26 (10%) women with unexplained infertility and 35 (14%) women with male infertility (p = 0.28). The adjusted OR was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.44-1.33). Significant differences did not also emerge when repeating this dichotomous analysis using other biomarkers and other thresholds for the definition of low-ovarian reserve.

Conclusion

This study confirms that ovarian reserve is unremarkable to natural conception. Physicians and patients should be aware of this concept to avoid inappropriate counseling and undue clinical decisions.

Topics

By this author

Related research

Diagnostics › Hormone Testing › Serum Panels · Longevity and Reproductive Aging › Reproductive Aging › Ovarian Aging
Giulia Galati, Marco Reschini, Alessandra Chine', Laura Benaglia, Paola Vigano', Edgardo Somigliana, Paolo Vercellini, Ludovico Muzii, Paola Viganò
G Galati, M Reschini, A Chine', L Benaglia, P Vigano', E Somigliana, P Vercellini, L Muzii, P Viganò
PMID 39340554 39340554 DOI 10.1007/s00404-024-07741-6 10.1007/s00404-024-07741-6 Galati et al. 2024, Galati 2024