Clinical Practice Operations · Workflow and Documentation
Gawron LM, Simonsen S, Millar MM, Lewis-Caporal J, Patel S, Simmons RG
Women veterans have a high prevalence of comorbidities that increase the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Screening for pregnancy desires in primary care provider (PCP) visits offers an opportunity to optimize preconception health. This pilot quality improvement initiative sought to assess Veterans Healthcare Administration provider preferences on One Key Question (OKQ) implementation, identification of veterans' reproductive needs, and the effect of training on documentation in a women's primary care clinic in Salt Lake City, Utah.
We hosted OKQ training sessions for providers and staff, audio recorded group discussions on implementation barriers, and explored themes. Women veterans presenting for a PCP visit in July 2018 self-completed a paper OKQ screening tool. We calculated summary statistics on responses. We conducted a pre-post analysis, with respect to training sessions, to measure for changes in family planning documentation during PCP visits.
Nineteen providers and staff completed the training. They acknowledged the importance, but believed that the screening tool should be completed by veterans and not be provider prompted. Forty-two women veterans completed the screening tool: 21% desired pregnancy in the next year and 26% desired contraceptive information. Chart reviews found a nonsignificant increase in current contraceptive method documentation between periods (20% vs 37%; P = 0.08), a decline in documentation of reproductive goals (22% vs 3%; P = 0.02), and no significant change in counseling.
Veterans identify reproductive needs via the OKQ screening tool, but provider documentation did not reflect changes in care following training. Further study is necessary to develop an optimal, patient-centered tool and implementation plan to support women veterans in their reproductive goals.
Wallis B et al., 2026 · Contraception · Free to read
To characterize how commercially available fertility-tracking devices and wearables define ovulation and anovulation, evaluate available comparator evidence, and assess user burden across 19 selected technologies. We conducted a structured landscape analysis of 19 fertility-tracking devices and wearables available in the United States. Technologies were evaluated for biomarker type, operational definitions of ovulation and anovulation, comparator evidence, intended use, regulatory status, and user burden, among other variables. Technologies clustered into four major categories: luteinizing hormone (LH)-only devices, multi-hormone devices, basal body temperature (BBT)-based wearables, and BBT-based thermometers. LH-only devices generally defined ovulation by detecting an LH surge or peak; multi-hormone devices incorporated LH and/or pregnanediol-3-glucuronide (PdG) measurements; and BBT-based technologies relied on thermal shifts. Explicit definitions of anovulation were uncommon and were frequently inferred from the absence of ovulation-associated biomarkers. The existence and design of comparator evidence varied substantially across technologies. Most comparator studies relied on surrogate measures such as urinary or serum hormones, whereas few technologies had comparator evidence against physiological reference standards such as transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS). Comparator studies in irregular-cycle populations were uncommon despite frequent marketing of these devices as appropriate for users with irregular cycles. User burden varied substantially across technologies. Fertility-tracking technologies demonstrate substantial heterogeneity in operational definitions, comparator evidence, and user burden. Greater transparency regarding ovulation and anovulation definitions, clearer reporting of comparator evidence, and more representative evaluation in irregular-cycle populations are needed to support accurate interpretation and integration into reproductive healthcare.
McAllaster S et al., 2026 · Contraception
To identify factors associated with unacceptable Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) responses, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, and satisfaction at time of intrauterine device (IUD) placement. Recruitment occurred at six Utah clinics between 6/24-2/25. Participants completed procedure surveys on demographics, reproductive history, anticipated pain, anxiety, and coping skills. Post-placement surveys assessed PASS responses, experienced pain by VAS (1-100mm) and satisfaction with IUD placement (5-point Likert scale). We determined factors associated with unacceptable PASS responses and a cut point delineating "low" vs "high" pain to assess measure associations. Of 194 participants, 21% (n = 41) reported an unacceptable PASS, which was associated with higher mean anticipated (65 mm vs 51 mm; padj=0.01) and experienced (76 mm vs 46 mm; padj<0.001) pain, prior sexual assault (55% vs 28%; padj=0.016), or violent death of someone close (25% vs 7%; padj=0.024). In controlled analysis, higher experienced pain predicted unacceptable PASS (OR:1.10;95%CI:1.06, 1.14). "High" pain (≥61mm) occurred in 44% of all participants. Of those with high pain, 55% reported an acceptable PASS response. History of prior pelvic exam (p = 0.02, padj 0.20), prior IUD placement (p = 0.003; padj 0.12), or violent death of someone close (p = 0.011; padj 0.13) influenced unacceptable PASS responses in this group. Of all participants, 21% reported dissatisfaction (n = 16) or neutral response (n = 24) regarding their IUD placement, among which only 13 reported an unacceptable PASS (32%). Satisfaction was influenced by mean VAS score (61 mm dissatisfied/neutral vs 50 mm satisfied; p = 0.01; padj 0.90). IUD placement pain level may influence satisfaction, but less than half of those with high pain (≥61mm) reported an unacceptable experience. IUD placement pain experiences are multi-dimensional and cannot be described by pain level alone. High levels of placement pain influence satisfaction and overlap but are not collinear with acceptability responses. Acceptability of IUD may be subject to temporal bias and influenced by whether their goals/needs are met and whether the pain was ultimately worth it.
Nantume A et al., 2025 · Drug and alcohol dependence · Free full text on PubMed Central
Substance use disorder (SUD) during pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, yet many patients face significant barriers to accessing treatment, including experiencing bias and stigma from healthcare providers. To inform improvements in care delivery, this study explored the experiences of healthcare providers who care for pregnant individuals with SUD. Researchers conducted seven focus group discussions (FGD) and fifteen in-depth interviews (IDI) using semi-structured guides, with participants drawn from both rural and urban hospital settings across Utah. All discussions were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and examined using the Template Analysis approach. Among FGD participants (n = 37), the sample was predominantly white (94.6 %), female (86.5 %), rural (89.2 %), and comprised of nurses (78.4 %). The IDI sample (n = 15) was more gender diverse (60 % female), had greater representation of physicians (53.3 %), and a higher proportion of urban participants (60.0 %). Template analysis revealed four major themes. First, providers held a range of perceptions toward pregnant individuals with SUD, reflecting both stigma and empathy. Second, many emphasized the importance of building trust through nonjudgmental communication and emotional support. Third, providers reported high levels of burnout, particularly due to limited resources and systemic barriers. Finally, participants highlighted knowledge gaps related to SUD clinical care and confusion around regulatory requirements like mandatory reporting. Despite the challenges described, many providers expressed strong dedication to delivering compassionate, person-centered care. The findings underscore the need for targeted provider education, institutional policies that reduce care barriers, and increased community and institutional resources to better support patients with SUD during pregnancy.
Stanford JB et al., 2024 · Linacre Q · Free full text on PubMed Central
Fertility awareness-based methods (FABMs), also known as natural family planning (NFP), enable couples to identify the days of the menstrual cycle when intercourse may result in pregnancy ("fertile days"), and to avoid intercourse on fertile days if they wish to avoid pregnancy. Thus, these methods are fully dependent on user behavior for effectiveness to avoid pregnancy. For couples and clinicians considering the use of an FABM, one important metric to consider is the highest expected effectiveness (lowest possible pregnancy rate) during the correct use of the method to avoid pregnancy. To assess this, most studies of FABMs have reported a method-related pregnancy rate (a cumulative proportion), which is calculated based on all cycles (or months) in the study. In contrast, the correct use to avoid pregnancy rate (also a cumulative proportion) has the denominator of cycles with the correct use of the FABM to avoid pregnancy. The relationship between these measures has not been evaluated quantitatively. We conducted a series of simulations demonstrating that the method-related pregnancy rate is artificially decreased in direct proportion to the proportion of cycles with intermediate use (any use other than correct use to avoid or targeted use to conceive), which also increases the total pregnancy rate. Thus, as the total pregnancy rate rises (related to intermediate use), the method-related pregnancy rate falls artificially while the correct use pregnancy rate remains constant. For practical application, we propose the core elements needed to assess correct use cycles in FABM studies. Fertility awareness-based methods (FABMs) can be used by couples to avoid pregnancy, by avoiding intercourse on fertile days. Users want to know what the highest effectiveness (lowest pregnancy rate) would be if they use an FABM correctly and consistently to avoid pregnancy. In this simulation study, we compare two different measures: (1) the method-related pregnancy rate; and (2) the correct use pregnancy rate. We show that the method-related pregnancy rate is biased too low if some users in the study are not using the method consistently to avoid pregnancy, while the correct use pregnancy rate obtains an accurate estimate. SHORT In FABM studies, the method-related pregnancy rate is biased too low, but the correct use pregnancy rate is unbiased.
Webb S et al., 2020 · Women's Health Reports · Free full text on PubMed Central
To understand how Title X providers currently engage with fertility awareness-based methods (FABMs) for pregnancy prevention in Title X clinics across the United States. We developed a survey to assess knowledge of fertility for purposes of pregnancy prevention, attitudes toward FABMs use for pregnancy prevention, and practices when patients request FABMs for pregnancy prevention. In total, 329 participants who met all inclusion criteria completed the survey. Respondents were generally highly knowledgeable on fertility, felt neutrally toward FABMs or thought they were a nonviable option for most women, and were likely to respond to patient requests for FABMs for pregnancy prevention by providing information. Qualitative responses included several barriers to provision of FABMs for pregnancy prevention and few successes to provision. Fertility knowledge and discussion of specific methods increased with the number of methods included in the clinic's written materials or with the number of different FABMs someone at that clinic had been trained on. Significant clinician or administrative barriers may exist to offering FABMs to patients. Incorporating up-to-date information on a range of FABMs-rather than treating them as one method-into contraceptive counseling represents an opportunity to increase the contraceptive offering for clients who want them, leading to increased patient satisfaction and successful family planning outcomes.
Nazem TG et al., 2017 · Fertility and Sterility
The care of infertility patients offers providers the unique opportunity to optimize health in the preconception phase. Assisting women to preemptively achieve a healthier lifestyle may not only improve fertility and pregnancy outcomes, but also diminish the psychological burden of infertility. The study sought to characterize modifiable lifestyle factors within an infertility population and address patient needs for lifestyle-based counseling before and after initial reproductive care consultation. Survey Patients presenting for an initial infertility consultation responded to a 26-item survey regarding clinical demographics, prior medical care, complementary medicine use, and perception of lifestyle habits and fertility prior to their visit. A follow-up 11-item survey was administered to determine the impact of the initial consultation. Questions were both structured and open-ended. Chi-squared, Spearman’s correlation, Mann Whitney U, Wilcoxon signed rank and McNemar’s tests were used for analysis. A total of 108 women (35.3 4.67 y) completed the preconsultation survey from 2016-2017; 26 women completed the follow-up questionnaire. Almost half (49.1%) were trying to conceive (TTC) for ≥12 months, with 14% trying for ≥2 years. Time TTC had a strong positive correlation with stress (r=0.48, p< .001) and a negative correlation with feeling control over fertility (r=-.21, p= .03). A longer time TTC correlated with greater likelihood of changing one’s lifestyle to be more fertility friendly (r= .26, p= .006), but those who made lifestyle adjustments also experienced more stress (p< .001). Participants who were up-to-date on their primary medical and dental care felt a greater sense of control (general practitioner: p= .01, dentist: p= .02) and less stress (dentist: p= .005) over their fertility. BMI had a negative correlation with interest in counseling on lifestyle (r= .2, p= .04). Women with a higher BMI were interested in weight management guidance (p= .005), but not in diet or physical activity counseling. Most respondents were interested in guidance on diet (88%), physical activity (84.3%) and mental health (75.9%), and 46% of women still desired direction on these factors after the initial visit. Prior to initial consultation, infertility patients may experience high levels of stress and feelings of uncertainty. A greater emotional burden is often encountered among women who spend a longer time TTC. Women may feel empowered if providers encourage them to engage with their primary care team earlier and offer methods to optimize their overall health and wellness. These interventions may help to alleviate anxiety and promote women’s sense of control during their infertility treatments. Fertility centers should consider the development of a mind-body program to optimize preconception health and enhance quality of life for women seeking fertility care.
Velmahos AH et al., 2026 · Journal of Restorative Reproductive Medicine · Free to read
To evaluate the extent to which a history of infertility is associated with adherence to specific diets among reproductive-aged females. Cross-sectional analysis Between 2017–2023, 7,227 North American female pregnancy planners aged 21-45 years enrolled in PRESTO (Pregnancy Study Online), a preconception cohort study. Participants completed self-administered baseline questionnaires during preconception. Exposure: Infertility history, defined as: 1) self-reported 12-month clinical infertility, 2) history of visiting a clinician for an infertility work-up, and/or 3) clinician-identified cause of infertility (e.g., ovulatory or tubal). Adherence to specific diets, including vegetarian, vegan, Mediterranean, Paleo, Weight Watchers®, ketogenic, dairy free, gluten free, Atkins®, South Beach®, Zone®, raw foods, or other at baseline. Multivariable log-binomial regression models estimated the prevalence ratios (PRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusted for age, income, and body mass index (BMI). The percentage of participants with a history of infertility was 26% based on the 12-month clinical infertility definition, 30% based on visiting a physician for infertility evaluation, and 26% based on an infertility diagnosis following a physician visit. Overall adherence to any particular diet was low (4.6% vegetarian, 2.8% ketogenic, 1.7% Weight Watchers®, 1.4% Mediterranean, 1.3% vegan, 0.8% Paleo, and all other diets: <0.8%); 86.6% reported not adhering to any particular diet. A history of 12-month clinical infertility was associated with lower adherence to vegetarian (PR=0.78; 95% CI: 0.60-1.03), Paleo (PR=0.43; 95% CI: 0.19-0.98), and Weight Watchers® (PR=0.55; 95% CI: 0.34-0.91) diets. An infertility history involving a medical work-up was associated with a higher prevalence of adherence to a ketogenic diet (PR=1.56; 95% CI: 1.17-2.09). Participants whose infertility was attributed to ovulatory or tubal causes were nearly two times more likely to adhere to a ketogenic diet (PR=2.01; 95% CI: 1.38-2.94; PR=2.22; 95% CI: 1.09-4.49, respectively). The cross-sectional design cannot establish temporality or causality. Data on dietary patterns and infertility history were self-reported, which can introduce misclassification. Generalizability may be limited because participants were pregnancy planners not using fertility treatments; participants were also more likely to be non-Hispanic White and of higher socioeconomic status than the general population. The ketogenic diet was more prevalent among females with an infertility history, while vegetarian, Paleo, and Weight Watchers® diets were less prevalent. These associations mirror the results of studies evaluating the reverse relationship, suggesting that some patients with infertility seek information for behavioral modifications via evidence-based medicine.
Peck R et al., 2012 · Linacre Q · Free full text on PubMed Central
Pregnancy is not a disease. But more fundamentally, neither is human fertility. They are normal physiologic processes of the sexually mature person. By classifying pregnancy and fertility as disease states, certain entities are able to position contraception as "the cure." Currently, these same organizations want to include oral contraceptive counseling and medications in the new national health-care plan under a preventive care mandate. But it is the physician's role to counsel patients on preventive care measures. We understand that these evidenced-based screenings help to change risky behaviors and catch disease in its earliest stages, thereby reducing patients' overall morbidity and mortality. However, we believe that patients incur substantial health risks when choosing oral contraceptives (OCPs). This paper reviews the major risks of OCPs. The authors presume that the prevailing widespread acceptance and promotion of OCPs indicates general agreement within the medical community that OCPs are good for the patient (or at least not significantly harmful). Therefore, this paper concentrates on the studies which show increased harm and risk to the patient choosing to use OCPs. We have concentrated our efforts on three major areas: increased rates of cardiovascular disease, breast cancer, and human papillomavirus (HPV) or cervical cancer. If fertility and pregnancy are not disease states, and are, in fact, normal conditions associated with healthy individuals, OCPs fail the most important test of preventive medicine: they increase risk of disease instead of decreasing it. Patients should not be misled or confused into believing that what they are taking is "good for them" and is of the same beneficial effect as other preventive measures.
