The premenstrual syndrome (PMS) has been proposed to result from excessive exposure to and/or withdrawal of brain opioid activity during the luteal phase. Because hypothalamic opioids are believed to modulate GnRH secretion, in part under the influence of ovarian steroids, we performed longitudinal studies of gonadotropin and ovarian steroid secretion across ovulatory, symptomatic cycles of 17 PMS patients and 8 normal volunteers. Pulsatile LH secretion was measured every 10 min for 8 hr at times when central opioid activity was expected to be low (early follicular phase), high (mid-luteal phase; ML), and declining (late luteal phase). In both subject groups, a cycle-phase effect was observed for LH pulse frequency (p = < 0.001) and amplitude (p = 0.002), and for the transverse mean concentrations of LH (p = 0.05), FSH (p < = 0.001), estradiol (E2) (p = < 0.001) and progesterone (P) (p = < 0.001). ML P secretion in PMS patients was pulsatile, and mean concentrations (over 30-60 min) were similar to those of normal controls. The changes in pulsatile LH secretion across the cycle were not different in the PMS patients compared to the normal women, though mean FSH in the ML phase was higher in the PMS group (p = < 0.05). The similar changes in luteal LH pulse frequency fail to provide evidence that GnRH secretion is impaired, thus challenging the view that the neuroregulation of the menstrual cycle in women with PMS is markedly altered.
PMID 1359599 1359599 DOI 10.1016/0306-4530(92)90059-g 10.1016/0306-4530(92)90059-g
Cite this article
Reame, N. E., Marshall, J. C., & Kelch, R. P. (1992). Pulsatile LH secretion in women with premenstrual syndrome (PMS): evidence for normal neuroregulation of the menstrual cycle. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 17(2-3), 205-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4530(92)90059-g
Reame NE, Marshall JC, Kelch RP. Pulsatile LH secretion in women with premenstrual syndrome (PMS): evidence for normal neuroregulation of the menstrual cycle. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 1992;17(2-3):205-213. doi:10.1016/0306-4530(92)90059-g
Reame, N. E., et al. "Pulsatile LH secretion in women with premenstrual syndrome (PMS): evidence for normal neuroregulation of the menstrual cycle." Psychoneuroendocrinology, vol. 17, no. 2-3, 1992, pp. 205-213.
To explore the pulsatile-release characteristics of LH and P in women with premenstrual syndrome (PMS) compared with age-matched phase-matched controls. Prospective, repeated measures, two-group study. Human volunteers in an academic research environment. Six women with rigorously defined prospectively determined PMS; six age-matched phase-matched controls. Frequency, amplitude, concentration, and coincident pulsatile release characteristics of LH and P at three symptom-related points of the luteal phase. No significant between-group differences in frequency, amplitude, or concentration were found. In pooled data, significant coincident pulsing between LH and P was demonstrated. The length of time between LH and P pulses systematically increased across the luteal phase, a finding not previously reported. In the PMS group only, significant coincident pulsing occurred at an unexpected zero time lag on the symptom-onset sampling day. A progressively increasing coupling interval may reflect the gradual decline of the corpus luteum. Presence of a zero time lag between LH and P at symptom onset in women with PMS may indicate an aberrance in corpus luteum response to LH stimulation.
Pulsatile secretion of LH in women has been shown to vary during the menstrual cycle. LH pulse frequency during the luteal phase is markedly reduced compared to that in the follicular phase. The objectives of the present study were to determine if similar changes in pulsatile LH secretion occur in the monkey, and whether endogenous opiates are involved in producing these changes. In order to document if LH pulse frequency is reduced in the nonhuman primate luteal phase, serial blood samples were collected from 10 rhesus monkeys at 15-min intervals for 6 h at 3 different times of the luteal phase (early, mid-, and late). This pattern of secretion was contrasted to that observed during the ensuing early follicular phase. LH pulse frequency during the luteal phase was significantly reduced compared to the early follicular phase. Mean pulse frequency (+/- SE) was 0.84 +/- 0.16 pulses/6 h in the luteal phase vs. 2.99 +/- 0.58 pulses/6 h in the early follicular phase. When endogenous opioid activity was blocked during the luteal phase by a 5-h continuous infusion of naloxone (2 mg/h), an opiate antagonist, LH pulse frequency was increased to 2.48 +/- 0.25 pulses/5 h. This frequency was markedly different from the frequency of 0.85 +/- 0.17 pulses/5 h observed in the control period which immediately preceeded the naloxone infusion. The mean amplitude of the LH pulses in the luteal phase, which was significantly greater than that observed in the early follicular phase (20.9 +/- 1.9 ng/ml and 11.7 +/- 0.3 ng/ml) was not affected by naloxone (23.5 +/- 2.4 ng/ml vs. 25.3 +/- 1.9 ng/ml). Infusion of naloxone for longer periods (9 h) in 3 additional monkeys caused an increase in LH pulse frequency which was maintained in 2 of the monkeys, whereas the third animal exhibited only an acute response (a single pulse). These results indicate that the reduction in LH pulse frequency that occurs in the luteal phase of the rhesus menstrual cycle is an event in which endogenous opiates participate. Our previous finding that beta-endorphin release from neurons in the median eminence is stimulated during the luteal phase of the monkey, together with the present results, suggest that beta-endorphin functions as a modulator of pulsatile LH secretion in the primate menstrual cycle.
Contraception/ComparisonDepression and MoodSleep and InsomniaLongitudinal Cohort Study
Open Access
Morssinkhof MWL et al., 2021·Psychoneuroendocrinology
Worldwide, oral contraceptive (OC) use is a very common form of birth control, although it has been associated with symptoms of depression and insomnia. Insomnia is a risk factor for major depressive disorder (MDD) but may also be a symptom of the disorder. Despite the large number of women who use OC, it is yet unknown whether women with previous or current diagnosis of depression are more likely to experience more severe depressive and insomnia symptoms during concurrent OC use than women without diagnosis of depression. This study examined associations between OC use and concurrent symptoms of depression (including atypical depression) and insomnia as well as between OC and prevalences of concurrent dysthymia and MDD. Participants were adult women with and without a history of MDD or dysthymia. We hypothesized that OC use is associated with concurrent increased severity of depressive symptoms and insomnia symptoms, as well as with an increased prevalence of concurrent diagnoses of dysthymia and MDD. We also hypothesized that a history of MDD or dysthymia moderates the relationship between OC use and depressive and insomnia symptoms. Measurements from premenopausal adult women from the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA) were grouped, based on whether participants were using OC or naturally cycling (NC). OC use, timing and regularity of the menstrual cycle were assessed with a structured interview, self-reported symptoms of depression (including atypical depression), insomnia with validated questionnaires, and MDD and dysthymia with structured diagnostic interviews. We included a total of 1301 measurements in women who reported OC use and 1913 measurements in NC women (mean age 35.6, 49.8% and 28.9% of measurements in women with a previous depression or current depression, respectively). Linear mixed models showed that overall, OC use was neither associated with more severe depressive symptoms (including atypical depressive symptoms), nor with higher prevalence of diagnoses of MDD or dysthymia. However, by disentangling the amalgamated overall effect, within-person estimates indicated increased depressive symptoms and depressive disorder prevalence during OC use, whereas between-person estimated indicated lower depressive symptoms and prevalence of depressive disorders. OC use was consistently associated with more severe concurrent insomnia symptoms, in the overall estimates as well as in the within-person and between-person estimates. Presence of current or previous MDD or dysthymia did not moderate the associations between OC use and depressive or insomnia symptoms. The study findings showed consistent associations between OC use and more severe insomnia symptoms, but no consistent associations between OC and depressive symptoms or diagnoses. Instead, post-hoc analyses showed that associations between OC and depression differed between withinand between person-estimates. This indicates that, although OC shows no associations on the overall level, some individuals might experience OC-associated mood symptoms. Our findings underscore the importance of accounting for individual differences in experiences during OC use. Furthermore, it raises new questions about mechanisms underlying associations between OC, depression and insomnia.
Prior studies among women with impaired fecundity have consistently demonstrated a positive association between daily perceived stress and the ability to conceive. However, the effects of daily stress on time to pregnancy (TTP) among women with proven fertility is not known. One hundred and forty-three women ages 18-35, in a relationship of proven fertility, who desired to conceive were included in the analysis. Daily diaries recording perceived stress (scale 0-10) were completed for up to 7 menstrual cycles or until pregnancy. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate the association between time-varying perceived stress tertiles (high [>4.1-7.2], moderate [>2.7-4.1], and low [0.1-2.7]) and adjusted fecundability odds ratio (aFOR), 95% confidence intervals (CI), after taking into account age, parity, education, time-varying caffeine and alcohol intake, fertility awareness tracking, and cycle intent to conceive. Among the 111 participants who completed daily diaries, 90 (81.1%) conceived. Women reporting high or moderate stress, versus low stress, had no difference in probability of achieving pregnancy (aFOR: 1.11 [95% CI: 0.58, 2.14]; 1.37 [0.71, 2.67]), respectively. Additional adjustment for intercourse frequency during narrow fertile window, or narrowing exposure focus to pre-ovulatory or pre-implantation stress did not appreciably alter the estimates. Daily perceived stress was not adversely associated with TTP among women with proven fertility. While a growing body of evidence supports adverse effects of more severe stressful life events on female reproductive function, moderate psychological stress, commonly referred to as eustress, among relatively healthy women with proven fertility does not appear to adversely impact TTP.