Lifestyle and Environment · Environmental Exposures

Rice consumption contributes to arsenic exposure in US women

Gilbert-Diamond D, Cottingham KL, Gruber JF, Punshon T, Sayarath V, Gandolfi AJ, Baker ER, Jackson BP, Folt CL, Karagas MR

Published December 20, 2011 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1109127108 PMID 22143778 PMC PMC3251121

RRM Academy Synopsis

Rice intake in pregnancy is linked to higher urinary arsenic

A New Hampshire study of 229 pregnant women with private wells found that women who ate more rice had higher urinary arsenic, a sign of recent exposure. The model predicted that 0.56 cup of cooked rice a day was comparable to a liter of water a day at the federal limit.

Key Findings

  • Of 229 pregnant women, 73 reported eating rice before the urine sample, with a median intake of 28.3 g/d, about half a cup of cooked rice. The other 156 reported none.
  • In 198 women, adjusted for age and urinary dilution, each daily gram of rice was associated with 1% higher total urinary arsenic and each daily microgram of tap-water arsenic with 3% higher.
  • After adjusting for age and urinary dilution, 0.56 cup of cooked rice a day predicted total urinary arsenic comparable to 1 L a day of water at the US federal limit.
  • Arsenic exposure from home tap water explained 12% of the variability in total urinary arsenic. Rice intake alone, without the arsenic content of the specific rice, explained 4%.
  • Rice intake was also associated with urinary inorganic arsenic, monomethylarsonic acid and dimethylarsinic acid, with P < 0.005 for each.

Interpretation

The study analyzed a New Hampshire pregnancy cohort of women with private water systems, in a region with elevated well-water arsenic. Each woman gave one urine sample at about 24 to 28 weeks of gestation and a diet record of the preceding days. Urinary arsenic is a biomarker of recent exposure. Rice showed similar associations across the main arsenic forms. The rice predictions assume cooking water free of arsenic. The authors note that arsenic content varies by rice type and that the effects of low-level arsenic on fetal development are not well understood.

RRM Context

Restorative reproductive medicine looks for root causes across the whole person and the whole environment, so diet and water belong in the picture. The authors cite earlier work linking maternal urinary arsenic to infant mortality and low birth weight. Partners in one household share the same food and water supply.

Abstract

Emerging data indicate that rice consumption may lead to potentially harmful arsenic exposure. However, few human data are available, and virtually none exist for vulnerable periods such as pregnancy. Here we document a positive association between rice consumption and urinary arsenic excretion, a biomarker of recent arsenic exposure, in 229 pregnant women. At a 6-mo prenatal visit, we collected a urine sample and 3-d dietary record for water, fish/seafood, and rice. We also tested women's home tap water for arsenic, which we combined with tap water consumption to estimate arsenic exposure through water. Women who reported rice intake (n = 73) consumed a median of 28.3 g/d, which is ∼0.5 cup of cooked rice each day. In general linear models adjusted for age and urinary dilution, both rice consumption (g, dry mass/d) and arsenic exposure through water (μg/d) were significantly associated with natural log-transformed total urinary arsenic (βrice = 0.009, βwater = 0.028, both P < 0.0001), as well as inorganic arsenic, monomethylarsonic acid, and dimethylarsinic acid (each P < 0.005). Based on total arsenic, consumption of 0.56 cup/d of cooked rice was comparable to drinking 1 L/d of 10 μg As/L water, the current US maximum contaminant limit. US rice consumption varies, averaging ∼0.5 cup/d, with Asian Americans consuming an average of >2 cups/d. Rice arsenic content and speciation also vary, with some strains predominated by dimethylarsinic acid, particularly those grown in the United States. Our findings along with others indicate that rice consumption should be considered when designing arsenic reduction strategies in the United States.

Topics

By this author

Related research

Lifestyle and Environment › Environmental Exposures › Heavy Metals
Diane Gilbert-Diamond, Kathryn L Cottingham, Joann F Gruber, Tracy Punshon, Vicki Sayarath, A Jay Gandolfi, Emily R Baker, Brian P Jackson, Carol L Folt, Margaret R Karagas
D Gilbert-Diamond, Kathy Cottingham, Kate Cottingham, K Cottingham, J Gruber, T Punshon, V Sayarath, E Baker, B Jackson, C Folt, Maggie Karagas, Peggy Karagas, M Karagas
PMID 22143778 22143778 DOI 10.1073/pnas.1109127108 10.1073/pnas.1109127108 Gilbert-Diamond et al. 2011, Gilbert-Diamond 2011