Role of tubal surgery in the era of assisted reproductive technology: a committee opinion

Fertility and Sterility, 103(6), e37-e43, 2015

DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032 PMID 25958255

Abstract

This document reviews surgical options for achieving patency in obstructed fallopian tubes and the factors that must be considered when deciding between surgical repair and IVF. This document replaces the document of the same name, last published in 2012 (Fertil Steril 2012;97:539–45).

Topics

tubal surgery versus IVF committee opinion ASRM, fallopian tube surgery patency obstructed tubes, tubal reanastomosis vs in vitro fertilization outcomes, role of tubal surgery assisted reproductive technology era, surgical repair fallopian tubes fertility restoration, ASRM guidelines tubal factor infertility treatment options, tubal ligation reversal versus IVF decision factors, salpingostomy neosalpingostomy tubal obstruction fertility, microsurgical tubal repair reproductive outcomes, proximal vs distal tubal obstruction surgical management
PMID 25958255 25958255 DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032

Cite this article

Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (2015). Role of tubal surgery in the era of assisted reproductive technology: a committee opinion. *Fertility and sterility*, *103*(6), e37-e43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032

Related articles