Reproductive Surgery · Tubal Surgery

Salpingostomy by microsurgery

Gomel V

Published April 1978 Fertility and Sterility, 29(4), 380-387
DOI 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)43210-3 PMID 148372
Read our synopsis

RRM Academy Synopsis

Live births followed hydrosalpinx microsurgery in 27% of 41 women

In a 1978 series of 41 women followed over a year, live births followed tube microsurgery in 27% of women. The women had hydrosalpinx (a tube blocked at its far end and swollen with fluid), and one Vancouver surgeon operated on all of them. Over 90% of patients had open tubes afterward.

Key Findings

  • Among the 41 women analyzed, 12 (29%) had one or more pregnancies in the uterus, and 11 (26.8%) had live births.
  • Five women (12%) had tubal pregnancies, all in the first year after surgery. One of the five later had a live birth.
  • Five of the 12 uterine pregnancies (42%) occurred in the first year. The paper puts the share after the first year at almost 60%.
  • Over 90% of patients had open tubes after surgery. Of the 25 women not pregnant, 3 had blocked tubes again and 2 had later pelvic inflammatory disease.
  • Fifty women had the operation: 32 on both tubes and 18 on one. In over 60% of cases, adhesions fixed the tube and ovary to the pelvis.

Interpretation

The report is a single-surgeon case series with no comparison group. It describes outcomes and cannot show that microsurgery caused them. Nine of the 50 women were left out of the analysis, and the author says selection for surgery was not rigorous. The author notes the uterine pregnancy rate may improve with longer follow-up, since almost 60% of the women who became pregnant did so after the first year. Tubal damage, adhesions and technique differ between series, which limits comparison. The author suggests the 12% tubal pregnancy rate may reflect more severe tubal damage in his patients. Three conventional-technique series he cites had lower rates at comparable uterine pregnancy rates.

RRM Context

Restorative reproductive medicine looks for the cause of infertility and repairs it where possible. The paper's workup covered the couple, with a semen analysis and temperature charting before surgery. Tubal surgery repairs the damaged tube and aims to restore its function. IVF goes around a damaged tube and leaves the damage in place.

Abstract

Salpingostomy for hydrosalpinx was carried out using a microsurgical technique. The postoperative patency rate was over 90%. Among the 41 patients followed for more than 1 year, 29% have had one or more intrauterine pregnancies and 27% have had live births. The ectopic gestation rate was 12%. All of the tubal gestations occurred in the 1st postoperative year whereas 60% of the intrauterine pregnancies occurred after the 1st year, suggesting a degree of restoration in the mucosa and the musculature of the oviduct with the re-establishment of patency and the passage of time.

Topics

By this author

Related research

Reproductive Surgery › Tubal Surgery › Tubal Cannulation · Infertility › Tubal Factor › Distal Tubal Disease
Victor Gomel
V Gomel
PMID 148372 148372 DOI 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)43210-3 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)43210-3 Gomel et al. 1978, Gomel 1978

Cite this article

Gomel, V. (1978). Salpingostomy by microsurgery. Fertility and sterility, 29(4), 380-387. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)43210-3