Some evidence suggests that infertile men, who are at increased risk for hypogonadism, metabolic derangements, and osteoporosis, have higher long-term morbidity and mortality than controls, but data are scarce and not conclusive.
Objective
We tested whether semen quality and reproductive function could represent a marker of general male health.
Design, Setting, and Participants
A retrospective study of 5177 individuals from a prospectively collected database of 11516 males of infertile couples who had semen analysis in a tertiary university center.
Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis
Of them, 5177 had all data for reproductive hormones, testis ultrasound, and biochemical determinations for glucose and lipid metabolism. Hypogonadism was defined as testosterone <10.5nmol/l and/or luteinizing hormone >9.4 IU/l. Individuals with a total sperm count of <10 million had genetic testing (karyotype, Y chromosome microdeletions, and CFTR gene mutations) and those with hypogonadism underwent dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for bone mineral density. Descriptive statistics and odds ratio (OR) calculation were used.
Results and Limitations
Men with a low sperm count (<39 million/ejaculate) are at a high risk of hypogonadism (OR 12.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 10.2-14.6) and have higher body mass index, waist circumference, systolic pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, and homeostatic model assessment (HOMA) index; lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; and a higher prevalence of metabolic syndrome (OR 1.246, 95 CI 1.005-1.545). All data are worse in men with hypogonadism, but a low sperm count per se is associated with a poor metabolic parameter. Men with hypogonadism have lower bone mineral density and 51% prevalence of osteoporosis/osteopenia. Longitudinal studies are necessary to support these data.
Conclusions
This is the largest study with comprehensive evaluation of semen quality and reproductive function, etiology and risk factor determination, and metabolic, cardiovascular, and osteoporosis risk assessment, performed in men referred for fertility evaluation. A low sperm count is associated with poorer metabolic, cardiovascular, and bone health. Hypogonadism is mainly involved in this association, but a low sperm count in itself is a marker of general health.
Patient Summary
This large study evaluated semen quality, reproductive function, and metabolic risk in men referred for fertility evaluation, and showed that a man's semen count is a marker of his general health. Men with low sperm counts are more likely than those with normal sperm counts to have greater body fat, higher blood pressure, higher "bad" (low-density lipoprotein) cholesterol and triglycerides, and lower "good" (high-density lipoprotein) cholesterol. They also have a higher frequency of metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance, a condition that can lead to diabetes. Men with low sperm counts had a 12-fold increased risk of hypogonadism or low testosterone levels, and half of them had osteoporosis or low bone mass. Fertility evaluation gives men the unique opportunity for health assessment and disease prevention.
Mazzilli R et al., 2026·Journal of endocrinological investigation
Male factor could contribute, alone or in combination with female factor, to the inability to conceive in a couple in more than half of cases. The effect of male factor infertility (MFI) on embryological assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes remains an ongoing discussion.
to evaluate the impact of MFI on embryo aneuploidy rates, to better understand the role and possible indication for Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A), considering the role of sperm characteristics, paternal age, sperm DNA fragmentation and sperm aneuploidies.
this narrative review included all available articles, published up to January 2026.
Available evidence, often based on heterogeneous and old-fashioned methodologies, suggests that MFI may impair embryonic development, particularly in terms of fertilization rate and blastulation rate, more than embryo euploidy; however, a comprehensive evaluation of MFI should be integrated into clinical practice in the context of couple infertility, to also optimize the efficiency and outcomes of ART. Promising results emerged from sperm DNA fragmentation as a tool to predict embryo euploidy, but further investigations involving larger sample sizes and improved standardization are required.
Grande G et al., 2026·The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism·Free to read
Male factor infertility (MFI) is frequently labelled idiopathic when evaluation relies primarily on semen analysis, potentially overlooking endocrine and pathophysiological mechanisms relevant for targeted management.
To phenotypically define MFI and develop a pathophysiology-based classification aimed at reducing idiopathic infertility following comprehensive evaluation.
Prospective monocentric cohort study conducted at a tertiary referral academic centre.
Eight hundred male partners of infertile couples evaluated between October 2024 and January 2026 after exclusion of isolated female factor infertility.
Prevalence of MFI categories, hormonal patterns across phenotypes, and proportion of idiopathic infertility after comprehensive work-up.
All patients underwent standardized clinical evaluation, hormonal assessment (total testosterone, FSH, LH), testicular ultrasound, and complete semen analysis. Microbiological testing, transrectal ultrasound, and genetic analyses were performed according to guidelines.
Primary spermatogenic failure was the most prevalent category (56.0%), followed by infection/inflammation (22.4%) and hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (8.5%). Idiopathic infertility was identified in only 5.3% of cases. Distinct endocrine profiles were observed, with high-FSH spermatogenic failure representing the dominant phenotype.
Comprehensive phenotyping markedly reduces the proportion of patients classified as having idiopathic infertility and identifies clinically relevant subgroups. This prospective study provides validation of a pathophysiology-based classification and supports a shift toward endocrine-integrated diagnostic strategies in male infertility, with potential implications for targeted management.
Ponce MR et al., 2026·Andrology·Free full text on PubMed Central
Transgender individuals assigned male at birth (AMAB) may choose to preserve their fertility prior to starting gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT). However, limited data exist regarding the baseline reproductive and hormonal characteristics of this population before and after GAHT.
To characterize semen quality and hormonal profiles in transgender AMAB individuals prior to GAHT and compare findings with cisgender men and with transgender individuals who discontinued GAHT for at least 3 months.
This retrospective study included transgender AMAB individuals from two tertiary andrology centers who underwent sperm cryopreservation before GAHT initiation (treatment-naïve group). Clinical evaluation included anthropometric measures, testicular volume assessment, varicocele detection, and sex hormone measures. Semen parameters were analyzed according to WHO criteria and compared with those of cisgender men and previously treated transgender individuals.
Thirty-two treatment-naïve transgender AMAB individuals were included. Hormonal parameters were generally within reference ranges. Only 46.9% of treatment-naïve individuals met WHO criteria for normozoospermia, compared with 75.5% of cisgender controls. Compared with nine previously treated individuals, estradiol levels were higher and seminal volume lower. A higher frequency of seminal abnormalities was observed, although not statistically significant.
A substantial proportion of treatment-naïve transgender AMAB individuals exhibited impaired semen parameters prior to GAHT initiation. Prior GAHT exposure showed a trend toward poorer semen quality. These findings support early fertility counseling and preservation in transgender individuals prior to GAHT initiation.
Besides gonadal involvement (hypogonadism, male factor infertility, and testicular hypotrophy), patients with Klinefelter syndrome (KS) may suffer from several extra-gonadic complications, including neoplastic events.
The aim of this review is to summarize all major clinical evidence dealing with the association between KS and neoplastic diseases and provide practical suggestions for the management of patients with KS regarding neoplastic risk.
This narrative review was conducted through a comprehensive search of the PubMed database, using combinations of the following keywords: "Klinefelter syndrome," "cancer," "neoplasm," "breast cancer," "germ cell tumor," "lymphoma," and "testosterone replacement therapy".
KS is associated with a higher risk of breast cancer and mediastinal germ cell tumors and an apparent higher risk of hematological malignancies, in particular non-Hodgkin lymphoma and leukemia. Evidence on testicular cancer is limited, with no clear increase in risk attributable to KS, while prostate cancer has a lower risk and lower mortality rate.
Given the complexity of the syndrome and the limited available evidence, regular clinical follow-up with targeted investigations when clinically indicated may facilitate early diagnosis and management of associated comorbidities.
Nedelcu S et al., 2024·Hum Reprod Open·Free full text on PubMed Central
Can semen parameters predict long-term health outcomes in men? There is a lack of evidence to suggest a higher risk of comorbidities in men with poor semen concentration. Male infertility has been long associated with a higher mortality risk and possibly higher chance of developing comorbidities but there has been less focus on semen analysis as a potential predictive factor. We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and EBM databases from inception to December 2023. MESH term strategy: heading 1 ('OR', semen analysis, sperm count, sperm parameter*, male infertility, azoospermia, aspermia, oligospermia, teratozoospermia, asthenozoospermia) 'AND' heading 2 ('OR', morbidity, mortality, diabetes, cancer, cardiovascular, death, hypertension, stroke, long-term health). We included all studies that analyzed the risk of mortality and/or future development of comorbidities in men with at least one semen analysis. Case series and reviews were excluded. A narrative synthesis was done for all studies and meta-analysis where possible. Odds ratio (ORs) (95% CI, P-value) were calculated for all men with one suboptimal semen parameter and associated with the risk of a particular outcome. The risk of bias was assessed with QUADAS-2. MAIN Twenty-one studies were finally included. There was either a high or unclear risk of bias in all studies. The results only allowed for meta-analysis on categories of sperm concentration. We found a 2-fold increase in mortality risk in azoospermic men compared to oligospermic (OR 1.96, 95% CI: 1.29-2.96) and normozoospermic (OR 2.00, 95% CI: 1.23-3.25) groups, but not in oligospermic compared to normozoospermic (OR 1.04, 95% CI: 0.52-2.09). There was no difference in risk of cardiovascular disease in any of the sperm concentration groups (azoospermic-oligospermic OR 0.94, 95% CI: 0.74-1.20, azoospermic-normozoospermic OR 1.11, 95% CI: 0.71-1.75, and oligospermic-normozoospermic OR 1.12, 95% CI: 0.80-1.55). OR for diabetes in azoospermic men was higher only compared to oligospermic (OR 2.16, 95% CI: 1.55-3.01). The risk of all-site cancer was higher in azoospermic men compared to oligospermic (OR 2.16, 95% CI: 1.55-3.01) and normozoospermic (OR 2.18, 95% CI: 1.20-3.96). Only azoospermic men might be at higher risk of testicular cancer when compared to men with normal sperm concentration (OR 1.80, 95% CI: 1.12-2.89). LIMITATIONS Although our pooled analysis shows an increased risk of mortality and all-site cancer risk in azoospermic men, the results show a lack of evidence to suggest a higher risk of comorbidities in men with poor semen concentration. Given the limited available data, the nature of the studies, and the high risk of bias, the results should be interpreted with caution. There is not enough data to confirm the usability of semen analysis as a predictor of poor long-term health in men, especially within the general population. No funding was obtained for this study. A.M. has received funding from Merck Serono, Ferring, Gedeon Richter, Pharmasure, and Cook Medical to attend medical conferences; has been a participant in an advisory board for Ferring; and has given an invited lecture for a Merck Serono advisory board. S.N. has received funding for medical conference attendance from Ferring and Cook Medical. PROSPERO No. CRD42024507563.
Sermondade N et al., 2013·Human reproduction update·Free full text on PubMed Central
BACKGROUND The global obesity epidemic has paralleled a decrease in semen quality. Yet, the association between obesity and sperm parameters remains controversial. The purpose of this report was to update the evidence on the association between BMI and sperm count through a systematic review with meta-analysis. METHODS A systematic review of available literature (with no language restriction) was performed to investigate the impact of BMI on sperm count. Relevant studies published until June 2012 were identified from a Pubmed and EMBASE search. We also included unpublished data (n = 717 men) obtained from the Infertility Center of Bondy, France. Abstracts of relevant articles were examined and studies that could be included in this review were retrieved. Authors of relevant studies for the meta-analysis were contacted by email and asked to provide standardized data. RESULTS A total of 21 studies were included in the meta-analysis, resulting in a sample of 13 077 men from the general population and attending fertility clinics. Data were stratified according to the total sperm count as normozoospermia, oligozoospermia and azoospermia. Standardized weighted mean differences in sperm concentration did not differ significantly across BMI categories. There was a J-shaped relationship between BMI categories and risk of oligozoospermia or azoospermia. Compared with men of normal weight, the odds ratio (95% confidence interval) for oligozoospermia or azoospermia was 1.15 (0.93-1.43) for underweight, 1.11 (1.01-1.21) for overweight, 1.28 (1.06-1.55) for obese and 2.04 (1.59-2.62) for morbidly obese men. CONCLUSIONS Overweight and obesity were associated with an increased prevalence of azoospermia or oligozoospermia. The main limitation of this report is that studied populations varied, with men recruited from both the general population and infertile couples. Whether weight normalization could improve sperm parameters should be evaluated further.
Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is highly prevalent, affecting more than 47 million US residents. This condition is also multifaceted, potentially leading to significant disturbance of numerous physiologic processes. This review article evaluates the literature regarding metabolic syndrome and male reproductive health. Links between obesity, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and insulin resistance are each examined with regard to their associated detrimental effects on male fertility. At the end of this manuscript, we propose a new MetS/male infertility paradigm. Additional studies specifically addressing the components of MetS and their impact on male reproduction will enhance our understanding of the underlying pathophysiology. These studies may also help clarify the role for therapeutic intervention.
Latif T et al., 2017·American journal of epidemiology
Semen quality has been suggested to be a biological marker of long-term morbidity and mortality; however, few studies have been conducted on this subject. We identified 5,370 men seen for infertility at Frederiksberg Hospital, Denmark, during 1977-2010, and 4,712 of these men were followed in the Danish National Patient Registry until first hospitalization, death, or the end of the study. We classified patients according to hospitalizations and the presence of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, testicular cancer, or prostate cancer. We found a clear association between sperm concentration below 15 million/mL and all-cause hospitalizations (hazard ratio = 1.5, 95% confidence interval: 1.4, 1.6) and cardiovascular disease (hazard ratio = 1.4, 95% confidence interval: 1.2, 1.6), compared with men with a concentration above 40 million/mL. The probabilities for hospitalizations were also higher with a low total sperm count and low motility. Men with a sperm concentration of 195-200 million/mL were, on average, hospitalized for the first time 7 years later than were men with a sperm concentration of 0-5 million/mL. Semen quality was associated with long-term morbidity, and a significantly higher risk of hospitalization was found, in particular for cardiovascular diseases and diabetes mellitus. Our study supports the suggestion that semen quality is a strong biomarker of general health.
Male Fertility › Male Endocrine and Genetic Factors › Male Hormonal Axis · Diagnostics › Hormone Testing › Serum Panels
A Di Mambro, Umberto Valente, Savina Dipresa, Leonardo Sartori
U Valente, S Dipresa, L Sartori
PMID 31427194 31427194 DOI 10.1016/j.euf.2019.08.001 10.1016/j.euf.2019.08.001 Ferlin et al. 2021, Ferlin 2021
00240q980