Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences, 11(1), 34-39, 2018
Tamoxifen is Better than Low-Dose Clomiphene or Gonadotropins in Women with Thin Endometrium (<7 mm) after Clomiphene in Intrauterine Insemination Cycles: A Prospective Study
Gonadotropin stimulation is used as the second line of treatment in patients with thin endometrium following clomiphene citrate (CC) administration, which is associated with higher cost, multiple births, and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Tamoxifen (TMX), a selective estrogen receptor modulator, acts as an agonist on the endometrium. The objective of the present study was to compare the efficacy of low-dose CC, TMX, and gonadotropins in women with thin endometrium (<7 mm) following Clomiphene in intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles. SETTINGS AND
Design
A prospective observational study between December 2011 and June 2013 was carried out in a tertiary infertility center.
Methods
Women (n = 502) undergoing IUI with endometrium <7 mm after 100 mg CC were included in the study and divided into three treatment groups. Women in Group A (n = 182, cycles = 364) received clomiphene (50 mg/day from day 3 to 7), Group B (n = 179, cycles = 342) received TMX (40 mg/day from day 3 to 7), and Group C (n = 141, cycles = 226) received continuous urine-derived follicle-stimulating hormone 75-150 IU from day 3 onward until human chorionic gonadotropin injection. Endometrial thickness (ET), pregnancy rate, and live birth rate were considered as main outcome measures. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Multiple comparisons using one-way ANOVA and Schiff's test were performed.
Results
Pregnancy and live birth rate were significantly higher (P < 0.004) in TMX and gonadotropin groups compared to clomiphene. A number of follicles in the TMX group were found to be lower (P < 0.001) compared to other two groups. In polycystic ovary syndrome patients, ovulation induction with TMX resulted in inadequate response in more than half of the cycles.
Conclusions
TMX can improve ET and live birth rate in patients with thin endometrium after clomiphene.
PMID 29681714 29681714 DOI 10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_9_17 10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_9_17 Sharma et al. 2018, Sharma 2018
Cite this article
Sharma, S., Rani, G., Bose, G., Saha, I., Bathwal, S., & Chakravarty, B. N. (2018). Tamoxifen is Better than Low-Dose Clomiphene or Gonadotropins in Women with Thin Endometrium (<7 mm) after Clomiphene in Intrauterine Insemination Cycles: A Prospective Study. Journal of human reproductive sciences, 11(1), 34-39. https://doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_9_17
Sharma S, Rani G, Bose G, Saha I, Bathwal S, Chakravarty BN. Tamoxifen is Better than Low-Dose Clomiphene or Gonadotropins in Women with Thin Endometrium (<7 mm) after Clomiphene in Intrauterine Insemination Cycles: A Prospective Study. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2018;11(1):34-39. doi:10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_9_17
Sharma, Sunita, et al. "Tamoxifen is Better than Low-Dose Clomiphene or Gonadotropins in Women with Thin Endometrium (<7 mm) after Clomiphene in Intrauterine Insemination Cycles: A Prospective Study." Journal of human reproductive sciences, vol. 11, no. 1, 2018, pp. 34-39.
Check JH et al., 2022·Gynecol Reprod Health·
Open Access
Many infertility specialists advise women with diminished oocyte reserve (DOR) that their remaining oocytes probably are of poor quality similar to women of advanced reproductive age. There have been studies, especially employing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET), showing very poor live delivered pregnancy rates despite the transfer of morphologically normal embryos in women even with mild DOR. However, other data suggests that the low pregnancy rates are related to the use of high dosages of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) drugs which down-regulate some key FSH dependent enzymes, cytokines, or proteins required for proper embryo implantation. Some studies have shown that techniques that favor FSH receptor up-regulation, rather than down-regulation, can provide the chance of live delivery 80% as well in women ≤ 35 with DOR, 70% for women 36-39, and 50% for women 40-42. Though some infertility specialists will encourage women whose only infertility issue is DOR, who reject the initial suggestion to consider donor oocytes, to proceed immediately with IVF-ET to maximize success, pregnancies are quite possible with natural conception. Thus, it seems imprudent to make couples undergo the financial burden of IVF-ET in the absence of a significant tubal or male factor problem. Not only have live deliveries occurred in women with DOR, using the principle described to achieve a mature dominant follicle followed by proper luteal phase support, with serum FSH levels over 100 mIU/mL, but also serum Anti-Mullerian Hormone (AMH) levels that were undetectable. This even applies to women in overt menopause where FSH up-regulation was achieved by negative feedback to the pituitary using ethinyl estradiol inhibiting FSH release, or down-regulation of hypothalamic-pituitary stimulation of FSH production by using gonadotropin releasing hormone agonists or antagonists.
Takasaki A et al., 2013·Journal of ovarian research
Clomiphene citrate (CC) is most commonly used as a first-line treatment of infertility. However, a disturbance of endometrial growth by the adverse effects of the CC has been recognized. Since a thin endometrium is recognized as a critical factor of implantation failure, preventing CC-induced thinning of the endometrium is important. This study was undertaken to investigate whether the modified CC treatments are useful to prevent a thin endometrium in patients undergoing CC treatments. This study is a prospective, randomized controlled study. The study was performed at the Saiseikai Shimonoseki General Hospital during a 4-month period (May 2012 to September 2012). Sixty-six infertile women who had a thin endometrium (< 8 mm) during the standard CC treatment (50 mg/day on days 5-9 of the menstrual cycle) were enrolled. The patients were randomly divided into three groups: 22 patients were given 25 mg/day CC on days 5-9 (half-dose group), 22 patients were given 50 mg/day CC on days 1-5 (early administration group) and 22 patients received a standard CC treatment again (control group). Endometrial thickness at the induction of ovulation was assessed by ultrasonography. The primary endpoint of this study was an endometrial thickness. Half dose administration and early administration improved the endometrial thickness (≥ 8 mm) in 14 patients (70%) and in 19 patients (90%) respectively, while only 3 patients (15%) improved in endometrial thickness in the control group. The mean endometrial thickness was also significantly higher in the half dose group (8.6 ± 1.5 mm) and early administration group (9.4 ± 1.5 mm) compared to the control group (6.7 ± 1.8 mm). No side effect was observed in this study. The modified treatment with a half-dose or early administration of CC significantly increased endometrial thickness in patients with a history of thin endometrium caused by the standard CC regimen. The modified CC treatments in this study can be beneficial for patients with a thin endometrium as a result of standard CC treatment. CLINICAL UMIN000007959.
Reimão Miller KA et al., 2026·Reproductive biomedicine online
This review explores whether the clomiphene citrate stair-step protocol (SSP) for ovulation induction in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) outperforms the traditional protocol. The following databases were searched: PubMed, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, EMBASE and Google Scholar from inception to 15 June 2025, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and with PROSPERO registration (CRD420251050294). Of 847 screened records, five randomized controlled trials were included (n = 520: n = 255; traditional protocol: n = 265). Analyses were conducted in Review Manager 5.4 using random-effects models. Risk ratios, mean differences and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Heterogeneity was assessed with I², risk of bias with RoB2, certainty with GRADE and robustness with leave-one-out sensitivity analysis. The SSP increased ovulation rates compared with the traditional protocol (RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.49; five randomized controlled trials [RCTs], n = 520, I² = 0%). Clinical pregnancy also favoured SSP (RR 1.46, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.05; four RCTs, n = 460; I² = 0%), although this result was largely driven by one study. The SSP shortened treatment duration (mean difference -32.59 days, 95% CI -38.66 to -26.52 days; three RCTs, n = 320, I² = 83%). Endometrial thickness was similar (mean difference 0.32 mm, 95% CI -0.95 to 1.59 mm; four RCTs, n = 460, I² = 91%). SSP improves ovulation rate and shortens treatment without affecting endometrial thickness and may increase clinical pregnancy rates.
Restorative Care and Assisted Reproduction · Outcome Comparisons
Restorative Reproductive Medicine (RRM) aims to restore fertility by diagnosing and treating the underlying causes of infertility. RRM is frequently promoted as an alternative to assisted reproductive technology (ART), despite uncertainty regarding its comparative effectiveness and safety. Where delayed childbearing and infertility are becoming more common, reliance on optimization of natural physiology alone may delay effective treatment and compromise reproductive outcomes. A systematic review of the current evidence comparing RRM to either ART or unassisted conception is, therefore, essential to inform clinical practice, guideline development, and shared decision-making for patients experiencing infertility. To assess the effectiveness and safety of RRM approaches, evaluated as a whole, rather than as individual components, compared with ART and medically unassisted conception in couples experiencing infertility. A systematic literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL and the Journal of Restorative Reproductive Medicine from inception to 28 November 2025. We included randomized control trials (RCTs) or nonrandomized comparative studies evaluating reproductive and safety outcomes of RRM as a unified treatment, compared with either ART or expectant management (attempted medically unassisted conception). Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts and full texts with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer. We retrieved 724 records, of which 16 studies underwent full-text review. No RCTs or comparative observational studies were identified. All 16 full-text studies were excluded for an ineligible study design (no control group); most were cohort studies in which all participants underwent RRM. Ten studies reported reproductive outcomes; nine of these made claims regarding the benefits or effectiveness of RRM. None of these claims were supported by the study designs used, as the lack of a comparison group precludes reliable estimation of treatment effects. Consequently, these studies cannot provide valid estimates of RRM success rates, nor permit any meaningful inference about its effectiveness relative to unassisted conception or ART. Large-scale RCTs or prospective cohort studies reporting effectiveness and safety outcomes are required to inform evidence-based fertility guidelines. There are no comparative studies to support reliable estimates of the safety and effectiveness of RRM compared with ART or medically unassisted conception for couples experiencing infertility.