Male Fertility Male Factor Treatment

The treatment of male factor infertility

Original title (Italian) Terapia del fattore maschile di infertilità

Grande G, Scafa R, Graziani A, Ferlin A

Published June 2025 L'Endocrinologo
DOI 10.1007/s40619-025-01617-w

RRM Academy Synopsis

Male infertility treatment depends on the cause found in the workup

This 2025 Italian review of male infertility treatments finds that treatment depends on the cause a full workup finds. The authors say gonadotropin (hormone) therapy has the strongest evidence. Supplements are still debated.

Study at a glance, narrative review: Male infertility treatment depends on the cause found in the workup
Study at a glance, narrative review: Male infertility treatment depends on the cause found in the workup. Source: Grande G et al., 2025, DOI 10.1007/s40619-025-01617-w.

Key Findings

  • Male factor infertility is present, alone or with a female factor, in about 2/3 of couples with infertility, which affects about 15–20% of couples of reproductive age worldwide.
  • Antibiotics are the main treatment for bacterial infections. Ideally the germ is identified and its antibiotic sensitivity tested first.
  • Gonadotropin therapy has the highest level of evidence of effectiveness in male factor infertility. Only about half of men with infertility of unknown cause respond to FSH therapy.
  • In a recent study the review cites, varicocele appeared to have a real clinical impact in fewer than 5% of infertile men.
  • Current guidelines advise against prescribing antioxidants to improve semen or pregnancy rates before a full diagnostic workup is complete.

Interpretation

This is a narrative review of male infertility treatments, based on the published evidence for each option. Gonadotropin therapy stands out with the strongest evidence behind it. The authors note that most supplement studies lack control groups or randomization. The findings support larger, controlled studies of these supplement therapies.

RRM Context

The review treats infertility as a problem shared by the couple. It ties treatment to the workup, with empirical options when no cause is found. Restorative reproductive medicine shares that order: find the cause first, then treat. The authors write that diagnosis should limit unneeded, costly procedures where possible.

Abstract

The diagnosis of infertility requires a multidisciplinary approach that involves both partners, in order to identify the causes and provide the most appropriate therapeutic options, limiting when possible the use of unnecessary invasive and expensive procedures. In particular, a complete diagnostic workup for male factor infertility (MFI) allows for classification of patients into one or more of the following diagnostic classes: infection and inflammation of the accessory sexual glands; ductal obstruction/agenesis/retrograde ejaculation; primary testicular damage; secondary testicular dysfunction; varicocele; idiopathic alterations of the seminal parameters; unexplained infertility. In relation to the underlying picture, therefore, aetiological or empirical treatments can be carried out, which are the subject of the following article. Antibiotics are the main treatment for bacterial infections. Therapy should be based on the identification of the pathogen and determination of antibiotic sensitivity by antibiogram. In case of leukocytospermia or in the presence of other inflammatory signs at the seminal level or signs at the ultrasound level, without isolation of pathogens, empirical therapy can be adopted with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or corticosteroids, administered orally or transrectally. Gonadotropin therapy represents the therapy with the highest level of evidence of efficacy in the field of MFI. Classically, gonadotropin therapy is used in hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, with excellent response both in terms of improvement of seminal parameters and in terms of spontaneous pregnancy. On the basis of these assumptions, FSH therapy is proposed from many years in infertile male patients, with seminal picture of oligozoospermia and/or asthenozoospermia, in the presence of FSH levels lower than 8 IU/L and in the absence of obstructive picture at the seminal duct level. In this situation, the therapy induces a significant improvement in the number and motility of spermatozoa and an improvement in the rate of spontaneous and post-assisted reproduction technique pregnancies. Selective oestrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) and aromatase inhibitors (IAs) represent possible off-label therapies, although their use is not supported by strong evidence and their use is not recommended by the most recent guidelines. Moreover, all studies agree in highlighting how the possible efficacy of the therapy is associated with a further increase in FSH levels, thus suggesting that a hyperstimulatory strategy with FSH could be associated with further improvement in seminal parameters even in patients with FSH higher than 8 IU/L. Although varicocele is very frequent in the general population and in infertile subjects, its clinical value in the management of infertility is limited. The diagnosis of varicocele as a real cause of infertility therefore represents a diagnosis of exclusion, to be considered especially in the presence of varicocele with numerous and/or large venous ectasias and significantly increased reflux, without other known causes of infertility. The use of supplements and nutraceuticals to improve male fertility is still a highly debated topic. Current guidelines reiterate that prescription is not indicated before the implementation of a diagnostic pathway. At the same time, the challenge in this area remains customisation, for a possible evidence-based use of nutraceuticals in patients with infertility and conditions associated with oxidative stress.

Topics

By this author

Related research

Male Fertility › Male Factor Treatment › Medical Management · Therapeutics › Anti-Infective and Anti-Inflammatory Agents › Antibiotics in Reproductive Care
Giuseppe Grande, Raffaele Scafa, Andrea Graziani, Alberto Ferlin
G Grande, R Scafa, A Graziani, A Ferlin
DOI 10.1007/s40619-025-01617-w 10.1007/s40619-025-01617-w Grande et al. 2025, Grande 2025