PloS one, 21(3), e0334669, 2026
Abstract
The psychological effects of first-time childbirth on parents have long been a focal point in social science research. This study provides a new perspective by applying demographic transition theory to explore how the experience of having a first child influences parents' mental health. Our findings indicate that the arrival of a first child not only increases family size but also brings about significant psychological and emotional adjustments in parents. These changes are often driven by pressures associated with financial stability, career development, and shifts in personal identity, which prompt parents to reconsider their life goals and values. Moreover, the psychological effects of first-time childbirth vary notably across different socioeconomic backgrounds. This paper offers empirical insights that can guide policymakers and social organizations in developing targeted support and intervention strategies to enhance parental well-being during the transition to parenthood.
Topics
psychological impact first-time childbirth parents mental health, transition to parenthood psychological adjustment primipara, first child parental well-being socioeconomic factors, demographic transition theory parenthood mental health, postpartum psychological adjustment first-time parents, parental identity shift first childbirth emotional changes, financial stress career development new parents mental health, first-time parenthood support intervention policy, primipara psychological effects family size increase, socioeconomic background parental well-being childbirth
PMID 41875188 41875188 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0334669 10.1371/journal.pone.0334669
Cite this article
Hilgers, T. W. (1980). The New Technologies of Birth.
Hilgers TW. The New Technologies of Birth. 1980.
Hilgers, T. W. The New Technologies of Birth. 1980.
Related articles
Research Methodology
Comparative analysis of stress markers, metabolic health, and gut microbiota in healthy and disabled dogs in long-term shelters in Thailand
Saengthong A et al., 2026·PloS one
Regular welfare assessments are essential for identifying and addressing the physical, behavioral, and emotional needs of shelter dogs, thereby ensuring their well-being and improving chances for adoption or long-term stability within the shelter environment. This study compared biomarkers of physiological stress [fecal glucocorticoid metabolites (fGCM)], metabolic status [serum malondialdehyde (MDA), glucose, triglycerides, low- (LDL) and high- (HDL) density lipoproteins], and fecal microbiota composition over a 1-month period in healthy and spinal-injured disabled dogs housed in a large dog rescue shelter in Thailand for over 1 year. No significant differences in fGCM concentrations were observed between groups, indicating comparable levels of physiological stress in healthy and disabled dogs under long-term shelter conditions. In contrast, disabled dogs exhibited significant metabolic and oxidative alterations, including elevated MDA and glucose, along with lower triglyceride and HDL concentrations. Microbial analyses revealed comparable alpha diversity but differences in beta diversity between groups. Notably, disabled dogs exhibited a reduced Firmicutes-to-Bacteroidetes (F/B) ratio and decreased relative abundances of beneficial taxa such as Peptostreptococcaceae. These findings suggest that, despite comparable hormonal stress indicators, disabled dogs may experience subclinical physiological shifts that warrant more nuanced welfare monitoring. A multifactorial assessment incorporating metabolic and microbial parameters is recommended to ensure comprehensive welfare evaluation for physically impaired shelter dogs.
Menstrual CycleSelf-Worth and MoodBasal Body TemperatureProspective Ovulation Cohort
Open Access
Feeling of self-worth in healthy premenopausal women-relationships with menstrual cycles and ovulation over 1-year in the prospective ovulation cohort
Shirazian N et al., 2025·PLoS One
Self-Worth is an over-arching evaluation of a person's sense of individual value. Self-worth, however, is an underappreciated concept. It has rarely been reported related to physiological data; we found no studies related to the menstrual cycle or ovulation. It is also unclear if Self-Worth is a stable trait or a variable state. We sought to discover if "Feeling of Self-Worth" (as recorded daily) was related to cycle phases and ovulation of spontaneous menstrual cycles (without hormonal contraception) in healthy premenopausal women over one-year in data from the Prospective Ovulation Cohort. Participating women were invited to complete the Menstrual Cycle Diary© (Diary©) daily; it describes cycle-related and other comprehensive everyday life experiences including negative moods as well as changes from each person's usual Feelings of Self-Worth. Women recorded their Feeling of Self-Worth on a 5-level ordinal scale as a letter translated to a number originally centered on their usual feeling (U = 3) with two higher and two lower (letters) levels. The validated Quantitative Basal Temperature© (QBT©) method was used to assess ovulation and luteal lengths. Fifty-three healthy, community dwelling, normal-weight, non-smoking premenopausal women mean age 33.9 (95% CI 32.4, 35.5) years old were studied. All participants were first required to document two consecutive normal-length (21-36 days) and normally ovulatory (luteal length ≥10 days) cycles before enrolment. Each participant completed the Diary© and QBT© records daily over a mean of 13 cycles (minimum = 8). During the study, cycle lengths were mean 28.04 (95% CI 27.80, 28.28) days with 71% of all cycles being normally ovulatory, 26% having short luteal phases (SLP, LL < 10 days) and 2.6% being anovulatory. Results in all women and all cycles showed that the mean annual Feeling of Self-Worth was 3.01 (95% CI 2.94, 3.09), thus very tightly related to their usual Feeling of Self-Worth. There were only small, inconsistent differences between Feeling of Self-Worth in the follicular versus luteal phases comparing normally ovulatory versus all ovulatory cycles (including those with short luteal phases). Analysis of Self-Worth within the 46 women having both normally ovulatory and ovulatory disturbed cycles (short luteal and anovulatory) showed that it was slightly lower in these women's normally ovulatory cycles (P = .03). Principal Components Analysis of all Diary© data showed that Feeling of Self-Worth was positively related to Interest in Sex and Feeling of Energy (together explaining 9% of all variance). In addition, Feeling of Self-Worth had a significant, negative loading on the Negative Mood Factor (that explained 14.2% of total variance). These data suggest that Feelings of Self-Worth in this comprehensive menstrual cycle and ovulation dataset in healthy women were not related menstrual phases and ovarian hormone levels.
Fertility AwarenessCreighton Model SystemProspective CohortIntentions and Compliance
Open Access
Pregnancies, intentions, and fertility behaviors during use of the Creighton Model FertilityCare System after initial intention to avoid pregnancy: Results from the Creighton Model effectiveness, intentions, behaviors assessment study
Stanford JB et al., 2025·PLoS One
Knowledge of the fertile and infertile phases of the menstrual cycle can be applied to conceive or to avoid pregnancy. Fertility intentions and sexual behaviors during the fertile time may influence whether and when pregnancy occurs. The Creighton Model FertilityCare System (CrMS) is a specific system of fertility appreciation used to conceive or to avoid pregnancy. The objective of this paper is to report intentions, behaviors, and pregnancy rates during use of the CrMS among couples who initially intended to avoid pregnancy.Data and methodsWe analyzed a prospective cohort study conducted in 17 CrMS centers across the USA and Canada, following 296 couples for up to one year after onset of initial use of the CrMS to avoid pregnancy. Baseline data included demographics, motivations, and pregnancy intentions for each partner. Couples contributed 2894 menstrual cycles, most of which had data collected (by questionnaires and daily diary) on cycle-specific pregnancy intentions, days of potential fertility, and fertility behaviors. Pregnancies were prospectively actively ascertained. We found a high concordance (91%) in cycle pregnancy intentions between partners. However, 44% of cycles with strong intentions to avoid pregnancy included intercourse on potentially fertile days or days of undetermined fertility status. Across all sensitivity scenarios, cumulative 13-cycle pregnancy rates with cycle intention to conceive ranged from 88.0% to 89.8%, and cumulative 13-cycle pregnancy rates with cycle intention to avoid ranged from 29.1% to 35.3%. In multivariate analysis, baseline motivations and intentions for pregnancy within 2 years were strongly correlated with the likelihood of pregnancy, more so than cycle intentions. The findings suggest that in some populations using natural family planning, baseline motivations and intentions may be more strongly related to pregnancy rates than cycle intentions. Our findings also highlight essential elements for evaluating correct use, including complete recording of intercourse and its timing.
Menstrual CycleCardiac Electrophysiology EffectsCardiovascularMenstrual Cycle Variations
Open Access
Ovulatory and anovulatory cycle phase influences on QT interval dynamics during the menstrual cycle
Naderi B et al., 2025·PLoS One
Ovarian hormones affect cardiovascular health yet few sufficient-sized studies with reliable ovulatory documentation have assessed the QTc-hormonal relationship. This study investigated QTc changes across ovulatory and anovulatory menstrual cycle phases. This prospective cohort investigation, a cardiac sub-study of the Menstruation and Ovulation Study 2 (MOS2), involved 62 healthy, regularly menstruating community-dwelling women during spontaneous menstrual cycles. Electrocardiographic recordings were obtained within-woman mid-follicular for all, and luteal (ovulatory) or premenstrual (anovulatory), documented by the validated Quantitative Basal Temperature© method. Fridericia's formula rate-corrected the QT interval (QTc). A subsequent meta-analysis was conducted, pooling data from three additional studies to evaluate ovulatory follicular-luteal phase QTc changes. In the 26 ovulatory cycles, QTc minimally decreased from the mid-follicular to the luteal phases (383.0 ± 12.8 vs 382.6 ± 12.8 msec, P = .859). QTc in the 36 anovulatory cycles tended to increase from mid-follicular to premenstrual phases (381.7 ± 13.1 vs 385.0 ± 16.1 msec, P = .166). The meta-analysis in ovulatory cycles yielded a random-effects weighted mean QTc shortening of 1.67 msec (P = .53) in the luteal vs the follicular phase, aligning with our cohort data. In confirmed ovulatory cycles, QTc changes were minimal, showing no meaningful luteal phase QTc shortening. QTc changes in anovulatory cycles were also insignificant, with a small QTc prolongation likely due to longer estradiol exposure not counterbalanced by progesterone. Under normal physiological conditions, QTc changes during the menstrual cycle are trivial, and menstrual status does not need to be considered when interpreting the QT interval.