Lifestyle and Environment · Nutrition and Metabolic Health

Ultra-processed food exposure and adverse health outcomes: umbrella review of epidemiological meta-analyses

Lane MM, Gamage E, Du S, Ashtree DN, McGuinness AJ, Gauci S, Baker P, Lawrence M, Rebholz CM, Srour B, Touvier M, Jacka FN, O'Neil A, Segasby T, Marx W

Published February 28, 2024 BMJ (Clinical research ed.)
DOI 10.1136/bmj-2023-077310 PMID 38418082 PMC PMC10899807

RRM Academy Synopsis

Ultra-processed food is linked to higher risk of diabetes and death

A review of 14 meta-analyses of observational studies found that ultra-processed food intake was associated with higher risk in about 7 out of 10 analyses. Convincing evidence linked it to cardiovascular death, type 2 diabetes, anxiety and common mental disorders. The 45 pooled analyses included 9 888 373 people in total.

Key Findings

  • Of 45 pooled analyses, 32 (71%) found that greater ultra-processed food exposure was associated with higher risk, across mortality, cancer, and metabolic, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, respiratory and mental health outcomes.
  • Class I evidence covered incident cardiovascular disease related mortality (non-dose-response risk ratio of 1.50, 95% confidence interval 1.37 to 1.63) and type 2 diabetes (dose-response risk ratio of 1.12, 1.11 to 1.13).
  • Prevalent anxiety (odds ratio 1.48, 1.37 to 1.59) and combined common mental disorders (odds ratio 1.53, 1.43 to 1.63) also reached class I in pooled cross-sectional studies.
  • Highly suggestive evidence (class II) covered all cause mortality (risk ratio of 1.21, 1.15 to 1.27) and obesity (odds ratio 1.55, 1.36 to 1.77).
  • GRADE rated 22 pooled analyses as low quality, 19 as very low and four as moderate. The authors graded 13 pooled analyses as no evidence (class V).

Interpretation

An umbrella review pools existing meta-analyses. The authors found no pooled analyses of randomized trials during their pilot phase. The 14 meta-analyses pooled prospective cohort, mixed-design and cross-sectional studies, so the findings are associations. Most pooled analyses covered adults, and five covered children and adolescents. The authors name residual confounding as perhaps the most pertinent limitation.

RRM Context

Restorative reproductive medicine takes a root-cause view of the whole person, so diet, metabolic health and mental health sit within its scope. The convincing findings here cover cardiovascular death, type 2 diabetes, anxiety and common mental disorders. The authors call for urgent research into the mechanisms behind these links.

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the existing meta-analytic evidence of associations between exposure to ultra-processed foods, as defined by the Nova food classification system, and adverse health outcomes.

Design

Systematic umbrella review of existing meta-analyses.

Data Sources

MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, as well as manual searches of reference lists from 2009 to June 2023.

Study Eligibility Criteria

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of cohort, case-control, and/or cross sectional study designs. To evaluate the credibility of evidence, pre-specified evidence classification criteria were applied, graded as convincing ("class I"), highly suggestive ("class II"), suggestive ("class III"), weak ("class IV"), or no evidence ("class V"). The quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) framework, categorised as "high," "moderate," "low," or "very low" quality.

Results

The search identified 45 unique pooled analyses, including 13 dose-response associations and 32 non-dose-response associations (n=9 888 373). Overall, direct associations were found between exposure to ultra-processed foods and 32 (71%) health parameters spanning mortality, cancer, and mental, respiratory, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, and metabolic health outcomes. Based on the pre-specified evidence classification criteria, convincing evidence (class I) supported direct associations between greater ultra-processed food exposure and higher risks of incident cardiovascular disease related mortality (risk ratio 1.50, 95% confidence interval 1.37 to 1.63; GRADE=very low) and type 2 diabetes (dose-response risk ratio 1.12, 1.11 to 1.13; moderate), as well as higher risks of prevalent anxiety outcomes (odds ratio 1.48, 1.37 to 1.59; low) and combined common mental disorder outcomes (odds ratio 1.53, 1.43 to 1.63; low). Highly suggestive (class II) evidence indicated that greater exposure to ultra-processed foods was directly associated with higher risks of incident all cause mortality (risk ratio 1.21, 1.15 to 1.27; low), heart disease related mortality (hazard ratio 1.66, 1.51 to 1.84; low), type 2 diabetes (odds ratio 1.40, 1.23 to 1.59; very low), and depressive outcomes (hazard ratio 1.22, 1.16 to 1.28; low), together with higher risks of prevalent adverse sleep related outcomes (odds ratio 1.41, 1.24 to 1.61; low), wheezing (risk ratio 1.40, 1.27 to 1.55; low), and obesity (odds ratio 1.55, 1.36 to 1.77; low). Of the remaining 34 pooled analyses, 21 were graded as suggestive or weak strength (class III-IV) and 13 were graded as no evidence (class V). Overall, using the GRADE framework, 22 pooled analyses were rated as low quality, with 19 rated as very low quality and four rated as moderate quality.

Conclusions

Greater exposure to ultra-processed food was associated with a higher risk of adverse health outcomes, especially cardiometabolic, common mental disorder, and mortality outcomes. These findings provide a rationale to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of using population based and public health measures to target and reduce dietary exposure to ultra-processed foods for improved human health. They also inform and provide support for urgent mechanistic research.

Systematic Review Registration

PROSPERO CRD42023412732.

Topics

By this author

Related research

Lifestyle and Environment › Nutrition and Metabolic Health › Dietary Patterns
Melissa M Lane, Elizabeth Gamage, Shutong Du, Deborah N Ashtree, Amelia J McGuinness, Sarah Gauci, Phillip Baker, Mark Lawrence, Casey M Rebholz, Bernard Srour, Mathilde Touvier, Felice N Jacka, Adrienne O'Neil, Toby Segasby, Wolfgang Marx
M Lane, Liz Gamage, Beth Gamage, Betsy Gamage, E Gamage, S Du, Debbie Ashtree, Deb Ashtree, D Ashtree, A McGuinness, S Gauci, Phil Baker, P Baker, M Lawrence, C Rebholz, B Srour, M Touvier, F Jacka, A O'Neil, T Segasby, W Marx
PMID 38418082 38418082 DOI 10.1136/bmj-2023-077310 10.1136/bmj-2023-077310 Lane et al. 2024, Lane 2024