Ultrasound evaluation of the Cesarean scar: relation between a niche and postmenstrual spotting

Bij de Vaate AJ, Brölmann HA, van der Voet LF, van der Slikke JW, Veersema S, Huirne JA

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2011
DOI 10.1002/uog.8864 PMID 21031351

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the relationship between a niche and abnormal uterine bleeding, and to develop a sonographic classification of niches and evaluate its relationship to abnormal uterine bleeding.

Methods

An observational prospective cohort study was performed between October 2007 and May 2009. All women who had a Cesarean section performed in our hospital were asked to participate. Two hundred and twenty-five women were included and examined with both transvaginal sonography (TVS) and gel instillation sonohysterography (GIS) 6-12 months after the Cesarean section. In case of a niche, the depth, volume and residual myometrium were measured, and the shape was assessed according to a specified classification. A questionnaire and pictorial blood loss assessment chart were filled in.

Results

The prevalence of a niche on evaluation with TVS and GIS was 24.0% and 56.0%, respectively. A niche was considered to be present if the depth was at least 1 mm visualized with GIS. Postmenstrual spotting was reported by 33.6% of women with a niche and 15.2% of women without a niche (P = 0.002). The niche volume was significantly different between women with and without postmenstrual spotting (P = 0.02). Most niches had a semicircular (50.4%) or triangular shape (31.6%). No significant relationship was identified between the shape of the niche and postmenstrual spotting (P = 0.19).

Conclusions

A niche is present in 56.0% of women with a history of Cesarean section when examined by GIS and is associated with postmenstrual spotting. Semicircular and triangular niches are most common, but the shape is not related to postmenstrual spotting.

By this author

Related research

A J M Bij de Vaate, L F van der Voet, J W van der Slikke
PMID 21031351 21031351 DOI 10.1002/uog.8864 10.1002/uog.8864 Bij de Vaate et al. 2011, Bij de Vaate 2011