Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 16(9), 463-467, 1999
What is the best strategy for presenting ART results? A controversial comment
Author affiliations
- Westmead Institute ROR
Abstract
Doctors love conventions. They have them in exotic places and they frequently use them to defend what would otherwise be inexplicable calculations. Thus 38 weeks of true gestation is, of course, 40 weeks of amenorrhoea, which may also be viewed as 38–40 weeks of pregnancy if timing is based on a “conventional” menstrual cycle. Even if this leaves the outside world to wonder, the clinicians understand. Many of the proponents of such ambiguity have moved away from obstetrics into reproductive medicine but have carried with …
Topics
Cite this article
Driscoll, G. L., & Tyler, J. P. (1999). What is the best strategy for presenting ART results? A controversial comment. *Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics*, *16*(9), 463-467. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1020590614263
Driscoll GL, Tyler JP. What is the best strategy for presenting ART results? A controversial comment. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1999;16(9):463-467. doi:10.1023/a:1020590614263
Driscoll, G. L., and J. P. Tyler. "What is the best strategy for presenting ART results? A controversial comment." *Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics*, vol. 16, no. 9, 1999, pp. 463-467.
Keywords
Benchmarking, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Embryo Transfer, Female, Fertilization in Vitro, Humans, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Pregnancy Rate