Therapeutics · Anti-Infective and Anti-Inflammatory Agents

A randomised trial to evaluate the effects of low-dose aspirin in gestation and reproduction: design and baseline characteristics

Schisterman EF, Silver RM, Perkins NJ, Mumford SL, Whitcomb BW, Stanford JB, Lesher LL, Faraggi D, Wactawski-Wende J, Browne RW, Townsend JM, White M, Lynch AM, Galai N

Published November 2013 Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology, 27(6), 598-609
DOI 10.1111/ppe.12088 PMID 24118062 PMC PMC3821875

RRM Academy Synopsis

EAGeR randomized 1,228 women to test aspirin before conception

The EAGeR design paper reports that the trial randomized 1,228 women who had one or two losses to aspirin or placebo, starting before conception. One group took daily low-dose aspirin and the other a matching placebo. The paper lists baseline traits and gives no live birth results.

Key Findings

  • 1,228 women were randomized: 615 to low-dose aspirin and 613 to placebo. Women in both groups also received daily folic acid.
  • Participants had a mean age of 28.7. Of them, 95% were white, 86% had more than a high school education, and 75% were employed.
  • 40% of participants had a household income above $100,000 annually.
  • Researchers screened 5409 women over 49 months, and 22.7% were randomized. The 1,228 women were 76.8% of the 1600 recruitment target.
  • The withdrawal rate was 12.2% (150/1228): 13.0% in the aspirin group and 11.4% in the placebo group (P=0.43).

Interpretation

The paper is a design and baseline report for a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial. The authors describe who enrolled and how. The paper gives no results for live birth or any other pregnancy outcome. The authors state the results will not apply to women with no prior loss, documented trouble getting pregnant, or three or more losses. Participants were mostly white and well educated. The trial reached 76.8% of its target, and sensitivity analyses were planned for the 150 withdrawals.

RRM Context

Restorative reproductive medicine asks why a loss happened before choosing a treatment. The trial tests daily low-dose aspirin against placebo in women with one or two prior losses and no known infertility. Women with a known major clotting disorder were excluded. Participants received fertility monitors, and visits were timed around ovulation.

Abstract

Background

Low-dose aspirin (LDA) has been proposed to improve pregnancy outcomes in couples experiencing recurrent pregnancy loss. However, results from studies of LDA on pregnancy outcomes have been inconsistent, perhaps because most studies evaluated LDA-initiated post-conception. The purpose of the Effects of Aspirin in Gestation and Reproduction (EAGeR) trial was to determine whether preconception-initiated LDA improves livebirth rates in women with one to two prior losses.

Methods

We performed a multicentre, block randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Study participants were recruited using community-based advertisements and physician referral to four university medical centres in the US (2006-12). Eligible women were aged 18-40 years actively trying to conceive, with one to two prior losses. Participants were randomised to receive daily LDA (81 mg/day) or a matching placebo, and all were provided with daily 400-mcg folic acid. Follow-up continued for ≤6 menstrual cycles while attempting to conceive. For those who conceived, treatment was continued until 36 weeks gestation. The primary outcome was the cumulative livebirth rate over the trial period.

Results

There were 1228 women randomised (615 LDA, 613 placebo). Participants had a mean age of 28.7, were mostly white (95%), well educated (86% more than high school education), and employed (75%) with a household income >$100 000 annually (40%). The characteristics of those in the treatment and placebo arms were well balanced.

Conclusions

We describe the study design, recruitment, data collection, and baseline characteristics of participants enrolled in EAGeR, which aimed to determine the effect of LDA on livebirth and other pregnancy outcomes in these women.

Topics

By this author

Related research

Therapeutics › Anti-Infective and Anti-Inflammatory Agents › Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs · Pregnancy › Preconception Care › Preconception Optimization · Birth and Delivery › Birth Outcomes › Maternal Morbidity
Enrique F Schisterman, Robert M Silver, Neil J Perkins, Sunni L Mumford, Brian W Whitcomb, Joseph B Stanford, Laurie L Lesher, David Faraggi, Jean Wactawski-Wende, Richard W Browne, Janet M Townsend, Mark White, Anne M Lynch, Noya Galai
E Schisterman, Bob Silver, Rob Silver, Bobby Silver, R Silver, N Perkins, S Mumford, B Whitcomb, Joe Stanford, Joey Stanford, J Stanford, L Lesher, Dave Faraggi, D Faraggi, J Wactawski-Wende, Rick Browne, Dick Browne, Rich Browne, R Browne, J Townsend, M White, A Lynch, N Galai
PMID 24118062 24118062 DOI 10.1111/ppe.12088 10.1111/ppe.12088 Schisterman et al. 2013, Schisterman 2013