Facts, Views & Vision in ObGyn, 1(1), 30-46, 2009
Abstract not indexed. Read at source
Fatemi, H. M. (2009). Assessment of the luteal phase in stimulated and substituted cycles. Facts, Views & Vision in ObGyn, 1(1), 30-46.
Fatemi HM. Assessment of the luteal phase in stimulated and substituted cycles. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2009;1(1):30-46.
fatemi, human. "Assessment of the luteal phase in stimulated and substituted cycles." Facts, views & vision in ObGyn, vol. 1, no. 1, 2009, pp. 30-46.
Schliep KC et al., 2014·J Clin Endocrinol Metab
Although adequate luteal hormone production is essential for establishing pregnancy, luteal phase deficiency (LPD) is poorly characterized among eumenorrheic women. We assessed the prevalence and overlap of two established short luteal phase duration less than10 days (clinical LPD) and suboptimal luteal progesterone of 5 ng/mL or less (biochemical LPD) and their relationship with reproductive hormone concentrations. Design, Setting, We conducted a prospective study in western New York (2005-2007) following 259 women, aged 18-44 years, for up to two menstrual cycles. Among ovulatory cycles with recorded cycle lengths (n = 463), there were 41 cycles (8.9%) with clinical LPD, 39 cycles (8.4%) with biochemical LPD, and 20 cycles (4.3%) meeting both criteria. Recurrent clinical and biochemical LPD was observed in eight (3.4%) and five (2.1%) women, respectively. Clinical and biochemical LPD were each associated with lower follicular estradiol (both P ≤ .001) and luteal estradiol (P = .03 and P = .02, respectively) after adjusting for age, race, and percentage body fat. Clinical, but not biochemical, LPD was associated with lower LH and FSH across all phases of the cycle (P ≤ .001). Clinical and biochemical LPD were evident among regularly menstruating women. Estradiol was lower in LPD cycles under either criterion, but LH and FSH were lower only in association with shortened luteal phase (ie, clinical LPD), indicating that clinical and biochemical LPD may reflect different underlying mechanisms. Identifying ovulation in combination with a well-timed luteal progesterone measurement may serve as a cost-effective and specific tool for LPD assessment by clinicians and researchers.
Wang L et al., 2008·J Assist Reprod Genet
To determine the effect of luteinized unruptured follicle (LUF) cycles on frozen thawed embryo transfer (FET). A retrospective analysis comparing the clinical outcomes after FET among 144 cases of luteinized unruptured follicle (LUF) cycles and 866 cases of ovulation cycles. Reproductive medical center, Beijing China. Chinese infertile women who underwent FET. None. Clinical pregnancy rate (PR), implantation rate. The implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, on-going pregnancy rate and live birth rate in LUF group were 12.76% (49/384), 27.78% (40/144), 24.31% (35/144) and 19.44% (28/144), respectively, and in ovulation group, 14.74% (332/2251), 31.29% (271/866), 28.29% (245/866) and 22.23% (193/866), respectively (p > 0.05). LUF does not affect the clinical outcomes of FET. Patients of LUF should be included in FET treatment.
Hilgers TW, 2004·The Medical and Surgical Practice of NaProTECHNOLOGY
A CrMS-synchronized hormone sampling protocol is detailed in which progesterone, estradiol, and other reproductive hormones are drawn at cycle-phase-specific time points defined by the charted Peak Day rather than by fixed cycle day, producing a targeted hormone profile that accurately reflects luteal and follicular function. This Peak Day-referenced approach substantially improves the diagnostic sensitivity for luteal phase deficiency, follicular dysfunction, and other endocrine abnormalities that fixed-day sampling routinely misclassifies.
Fraidakis M et al., 2023·Cureus
Ovarian rejuvenation is an innovative procedure intended to restore ovarian fertility and development during the climacteric and has been used to enhance fertility in women with premature ovarian insufficiency (POI). This retrospective study was conducted to determine the effects of an intraovarian platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection on ovarian stimulation outcomes in women referred to an in vitro fertilisation centre. This was a retrospective observational study, and the inclusion criteria included women of reproductive age with at least one ovary with a history of infertility, hormonal abnormalities, an absence of a menstrual cycle, and premature ovarian failure. During the patient's first consultation, a detailed reproductive history was recorded, a pelvic scan for ovarian size was conducted, and hormonal analysis for follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), estradiol (E2), and luteinizing hormone (LH) was conducted. In the study, 469 women with a history of infertility, hormonal abnormalities, an absence of a menstrual cycle, and premature ovarian failure had hormonal levels recorded up to four months after treatment, and these were included in the study. The volume of peripheral blood required to prepare 6-8 mL of PRP for administration was 40-60 mL. The initial concentration of platelets in the peripheral blood sample was about 25000/µL, whereas the prepared PRP had a concentration of 900.000/µL. A volume of approximately 2-4 mL per ovary, depending on the ovarian volume, was used for the intraovarian injection. PRP intervention had significant effects on FSH concentration at the α = 0.05 level. Statistically significant increases in normal values of FSH and E2were observed for months three and four after the PRP intervention for all age groups. The results of our observational study revealed that a PRP intraovarian injection is associated with improved ovarian tissue and function. Future randomised clinical trials are needed to shed light on the use of PRP in ovarian rejuvenation before offering it routinely in clinical practice.