Infertility is a significant and constantly increasing individual and social problem. It is estimated that at present it affects approx. 15 to 20 percent of couples. Inability to conceive a child elicits a range of unfavourable implications in the scope of emotional experiences, in the partner’s relationship and in a broader social perspective. Making a decision on undergoing diagnostics and infertility treatment is a difficult and often postponed moment for many couples. This is an expression of the escape model of dealing with a situation that threatens with a fall of self-esteem. However, if a couple reacts in a task-oriented way and participates in the diagnostic and therapeutic procedure, new doubts appear connected with the medical, psychological, social and ethical sphere. Infertility treatment sometimes prompts fear connected with the stripping of intimacy, loss of control over one’s body, possible complications and unsuccessful therapy. This article is an analysis of the medical and the other aspects of struggling with infertility with reference to two extremely different methods of solving this problem: NaProTechnology as a process of assisting natural procreation and assisted reproductive techniques with a special consideration of in vitro fertilization.
NaProTechnology versus assisted reproductive techniques comparison, NaProTechnology alternative to IVF infertility treatment, natural procreation technology infertility management, ethical aspects in vitro fertilization NaProTechnology, infertility treatment psychological social implications, NaProTechnology diagnostic therapeutic approach couples, assisted reproduction versus restorative reproductive medicine, infertility emotional impact couples decision making, Dowbór-Dzwonka NaProTechnology assisted reproduction review, natural fertility treatment methods vs ART
DOI 10.12923/j.0044-2011/122/3/a.19 10.12923/j.0044-2011/122/3/a.19
Cite this article
Dowbór-Dzwonka, A., Cegła, B., Filanowicz, M., & Szymkiewicz, E. (2012). Assisted reproductive techniques and NaProTechnology. *Zdrowie publiczne*, *122*(3), 322-328. https://doi.org/10.12923/j.0044-2011/122/3/a.19
Dowbór-Dzwonka A, Cegła B, Filanowicz M, Szymkiewicz E. Assisted reproductive techniques and NaProTechnology. Zdr Publ. 2012;122(3):322-328. doi:10.12923/j.0044-2011/122/3/a.19
Dowbór-Dzwonka, Aneta, et al. "Assisted reproductive techniques and NaProTechnology." *Zdrowie publiczne*, vol. 122, no. 3, 2012, pp. 322-328.
Gruszka MJ, 2015
Open Access
Seminare. Poszukiwania naukowe
In vitro fertilization (IVF) is a method known almost all over the world, by which modern man is trying to cope with the problem of infertility. The aim of this article is to show the eugenic roots of...
NaProTECHNOLOGY > Philosophy > Alternative to IVFEthics/Philosophy > Reproductive Ethics > Eugenics and IVFInfertility > Treatment Approaches > NaProTECHNOLOGY vs IVF