Ultrasound · Transvaginal Ultrasound
Eskenazi B et al., 2001 · Fertil Steril
To determine whether the surgical diagnosis of endometriosis can be predicted using symptoms, signs, and ultrasound findings. Prospective study (study sample); retrospective record review (test sample). Hospital of Desio (study sample) and Mangiagalli Hospital (test sample), Italy. PATIENT(S): Ninety women scheduled to undergo laparoscopy or laparotomy (study sample); 120 women who underwent laparoscopy (test sample). The study sample group was interviewed before surgery about infertility and dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and noncyclic pelvic pain and each member had a pelvic examination and a transvaginal ultrasound. At surgery, endometriosis was noted. For the test sample, the same information was abstracted from medical records after laparoscopy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The ability of symptoms, signs, and ultrasound to predict endometriosis at surgery. A classification tree was developed with the study sample and evaluated with the test sample. RESULT(S): Ovarian endometriosis, but not nonovarian endometriosis, could be reliably predicted with noninvasive tools. Ultrasound and examination best predicted ovarian endometriosis, correctly classifying 100% of cases with no false positive diagnoses in the study sample. Similar results were found in the test sample. CONCLUSION(S): Noninvasive tools may be used to identify women with ovarian, but not nonovarian endometriosis, with excellent agreement with surgical diagnosis.
Prescribing Safety · Off-Label Prescribing
Wiseman DM et al., 1999 · J Reprod Med
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of an oxidized, regenerated, cellulose adhesion barrier (Interceed TC7) in the reduction of pelvic adhesions. Clinical studies published or completed by December 31, 1994, evaluating the barrier used at laparotomy were considered for a metaanalysis. Of 10 studies (n = 560) identified, data from 7 (n = 389) met the inclusion criteria for determining the reduction in the incidence of adhesions and 5 (n = 311) for determining the reduction in adhesion extent (raw surface area after adhesiolysis). There was a 24.2 +/- 3.3% difference in the incidence of adhesions (P < .001) between barrier-treated and untreated sites. Adhesion-free outcomes were 1.5-2.5 times more likely at barrier-treated sites than at sites with good surgical technique alone (odds ratio = 2.89; 95% confidence interval = 2.15-3.90). Barrier treatment resulted in a greater reduction (1.1 +/- 0.4 cm2) in adhesion extent (raw surface area) than good surgical technique alone (P < .001). Four adverse events were recorded; they were typical of those seen after surgery. No event was considered to be definitely related to the use of the barrier. The barrier significantly reduced the incidence and extent of adhesions as compared with no treatment, confirming the conclusion from individual studies that it is safe and effective in pelvic laparotomy surgery.
Adhesion Prevention · Barrier Agents
Franklin RR, 1995 · Obstet Gynecol
To evaluate the efficacy of Interceed (TC7) Absorbable Adhesion Barrier, an oxidized regenerated cellulose fabric, as a barrier to the development of postsurgical ovarian adhesions after surgery involving the ovaries. In a multicenter randomized study, 55 patients with bilateral ovarian disease were treated at initial laparotomy. At the end of the procedure, one ovary was assigned randomly to be wrapped with Interceed and the other was left uncovered. A second-look laparoscopy was performed 10-98 days later to evaluate the occurrence and severity of adhesions and the raw ovarian surface area exposed after lysis of adhesions. At second-look laparoscopy, 26 of 55 Interceed-treated ovaries were free of adhesions, compared with 14 of 55 untreated control ovaries, a statistically significant difference (P = .028, Fisher exact test). At second-look laparoscopy, ovaries treated with Interceed formed adhesions less extensively (1.66 +/- 0.34 cm2) than did untreated ovaries (2.75 +/- 0.60 cm2) and with a greater reduction of raw ovarian surface area (difference in area differential -1.89 +/- 0.96 cm2; P = .055, paired t test). Adhesion scores at second-look laparoscopy were reduced significantly for ovaries treated with Interceed compared with untreated ovaries (P = .02, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). No adverse events were recorded during the course of the study. Treatment of ovaries with Interceed significantly reduced the occurrence and severity of postsurgical ovarian adhesions.
Adhesion Prevention · Barrier Agents
Crain J et al., 1995 · J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc
One of the major postoperative complications of reproductive surgery is the formation of adhesions. 1, 2 Over the past several decades a number of methods have been explored to solve this problem, g, 4 Recently there has been renewed interest in covering the damaged peritoneal surface with an absorbable or nonabsorbable barrier as a means of preventing adhesions after fertility-enhancing surgery. Currently, two barriers are commercially available for clinical use: Interceed Absorbable Adhesion Barrier (Ethicon, Somerville, NJ), which is composed of oxidized regenerated cellulose, and the Gore-Tex Surgical Membrane (W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc., Flagstaff, AZ), constructed of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE). Interceed has been investigated both experimentally and clinically and has proved effective in some circumstances. 5,6 Studies also report on the laparoscopic application of Interceed in fertility-enhancement procedures.7, 8 Recent reports, however, have questioned the product's degree of effectiveness and raised concern about possible residual effects it may have on peritoneal tissue? 11 Gore-Tex Surgical Membrane has been indicated for use in peritoneal reconstruction since 1983, and experimental and clinical reports describe its effectiveness in preventing adhesion formation. 12-14
Interceed is an absorbable material that is phagocytized by macrophages within 1 month. Gore-Tex Surgical Membrane is nonabsorbable and is intended to be a permanent implant. Since all published reports on the clinical application of the Gore-Tex membrane discuss implantation by laparotomy, ~g, 14 the ease of use of this product in laparoscopic surgery is of particular interest. Moreover, because of its permanence, its long-term safety and effectiveness merit examination. A prospective, multicenter clinical study was undertaken to evaluate the ease of using Gore-Tex Surgical Membrane laparoscopically.
