Research Methods · Measurement and Statistics

Canadian normative data for the SF-36 health survey. Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study Research Group

WM Hopman, T Towheed, T Anastassiadies, A Tenenhouse, S Poliquin, C Berger, L Joseph, JP Brown, TM Murray, JD Adachi, DA Hanley, E Papadimitropoulos and the CaMos Research Group

Published August 8, 2000 CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal = Journal De l'Association Medicale Canadienne, 163(3), 265-271
PMID 10951722

Abstract

Background

The Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form (SF-36) is a widely used measure of health-related quality of life. Normative data are the key to determining whether a group or an individual scores above or below the average for their country, age or sex. Published norms for the SF-36 exist for other countries but have not been previously published for Canada.

Methods

The Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study is a prospective cohort study involving 9423 randomly selected Canadian men and women aged 25 years or more living in the community. The sample was drawn within a 50-km radius of 9 Canadian cities, and the information collected included the SF-36 as a measure of health-related quality of life. This provided a unique opportunity to develop age- and sex-adjusted normative data for the Canadian population.

Results

Canadian men scored substantially higher than women on all 8 domains and the 2 summary component scales of the SF-36. Canadians scored higher than their US counterparts on all SF-36 domains and both summary component scales and scored higher than their UK counterparts on 4 domains, although many of the differences are not large.

Interpretation

The differences in the SF-36 scores between age groups, sexes and countries confirm that these Canadian norms are necessary for comparative purposes. The data will be useful for assessing the health status of the general population and of patient populations, and the effect of interventions on health-related quality of life.

Topics

By this author

Related research

Research Methods › Measurement and Statistics › Instrument Development and Validation
Alan Tenenhouse, Timothy M Murray
A Tenenhouse, Tim Murray, T Murray
PMID 10951722 10951722 Hopman et al. 2000, Hopman 2000