Cervical incompetence is one of the main contributors to repeated pregnancy loss, accounting for approximately 25% of the cases. Typically it results in progressive cervical dilatation, leading to a painless second- or early-third-trimester abortion. In most instances cervical incompetence is the result of previous obstetric or gynecologic trauma; a congenital etiology is unusual. Despite the various reported diagnostic procedures, the obstetric history and frequent visual and digital examinations during pregnancy remain the most important factors in arriving at the correct diagnosis. In spite of the fact that numerous procedures have been advocated as treatment, the McDonald purse string closure technique is by far the most simple and effective corrective surgical technique, yielding an overwhelming number of successful pregnancies.
Ansari, Amir Hossein, and Robert A. Reynolds. "Cervical incompetence. A review." The Journal of reproductive medicine, vol. 32, no. 3, 1987, pp. 161-171.
The concept that a cervix could be inadequate or incompetent for retaining a normal pregnancy was publicized by Lash and Lash in 1950. It did not catch the fancy of the majority of obstetricians to any extent until the introduction of the relatively simple corrective procedure advocated by Shirodkar in 1955 and publicized by Barter et al. Since then there has been a constantly increasing number of reports discussing this problem. Incompetent cervical os is estimated to represent only a small percentage of all causes of fetal wastage …
Cervical cerclage as a temporizing measure for the treatment of patients with placenta previa was evaluated in 25 patients admitted to the hospital for vaginal bleeding between 24-30 weeks' gestation and sonographic evidence of a placenta previa. The patients were randomly assigned to either cerclage (13) or conventional management (12). Cerclage patients had significantly better perinatal outcome, as indicated by more advanced gestational age at the time of delivery (34.9 +/- 3.0 versus 31.6 +/- 2.9 weeks; P = .02), larger birth weight (2709 +/- 511 versus 1812 +/- 506 g; P = .002), and fewer neonatal complications (two of 13 versus ten of 12 infants; P = .001). Maternal bleeding was more frequent and severe for patients in the control group. The total hospital cost was less for cerclage patients than for those receiving conventional expectant management ($9898 +/- 3943 versus $27,271 +/- 9901; P = .02). These results support the use of cervical cerclage for the treatment of patients with symptomatic placenta previa early in gestation.
birth-and-delivery/cesarean-birth/cesarean-recovery-and-scaruterine-and-pelvic-conditions/acquired-uterine-conditions/isthmocelereproductive-surgery/uterine-surgery/cesarean-scar-repair
Open Access
Bujold E et al., 2026·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Normal uterine function depends on cyclical regeneration and the capacity to sustain pregnancy. A cesarean incision represents an injury to this remarkable organ. Although the uterus possesses exceptional healing potential, cesarean delivery increases the risk of secondary infertility, pelvic pain, uterine rupture, and abnormal placentation in subsequent pregnancies. The two most important determinants of successful hysterotomy healing after cesarean delivery are the location of the incision and the surgical technique used for closure. The anatomic site of entry-whether the corpus, lower uterine segment, or cervix-defines the tissue composition, vascularity, and contractility at the wound margins, which in turn influence how the scar remodels and withstands subsequent pregnancies. Surgical technique is also important. A robust body of experimental and clinical evidence demonstrates that restoring anatomic integrity by reapproximating uterine layers while excluding the endometrium produces stronger scars and reduces late complications. The rationale for excluding the endometrium is to prevent displacement of endometrial tissue into the myometrium and to avoid mucosal tearing against a foreign body (i.e. suture material), both of which predispose to defective healing. When the endometrium is incorporated, healing is often impaired, leading to niches or isthmoceles, adenomyosis, and endometriosis at the scar site. Over time, these defects have been recognized as contributors to abnormal bleeding, pelvic pain, infertility, uterine rupture, and placenta accreta spectrum disorders. Despite this evidence, single-layer closures that incorporate endometrium became widely adopted because of their speed and simplicity, while their long-term sequels were initially underappreciated. This has prompted renewed scrutiny of closure techniques, including comparisons of single-layer vs double-layer closure, locking vs nonlocking sutures, type of sutures, and the direction of suture. Collectively, the data show that optimal closure respects uterine anatomy, restores the natural alignment of tissues, and achieves hemostasis without compromising perfusion or strangulating tissues. Building on these principles, we herein describe a refined 3-layer closure. The first layer approximates decidua and junctional myometrium while excluding surface endometrium to prevent tissue entrapment and bacterial contamination. The second layer restores anatomic wall integrity by reapproximating the bulk of the myometrium, thereby reinforcing strength and distributing tension across the scar. The third layer reapproximates superficial myometrium and serosa, smoothing the uterine surface and reducing adhesions. This technique is not simply a return to traditional double-layer methods or an extension of single-layer practice, but rather a refinement that integrates lessons from visceral surgery and contemporary obstetric data. Its rationale is to restore anatomy, secure hemostasis without ischemia, and preserve long-term uterine function. While short-term safety appears comparable across closure methods, evidence increasingly indicates that long-term reproductive outcomes depend on how closure respects tissue biology. We argue that appropriate repair is more important than a fast repair: meticulous restoration of uterine anatomy should take precedence over operative speed. The enduring success of a hysterotomy repair depends on the surgical technique employed, as it directly affects women's future reproductive health.
Hsu JZ et al., 2025·Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
Endometriosis is a chronic gynaecological condition affecting reproductive-aged women. It has been associated with infertility and potential risks for adverse pregnancy outcomes, although population-level evidence remains limited. This retrospective cohort study, including 147,950 pregnant women aged 20-45 years, used nationwide population-based data to compare the outcomes between women with (n = 11,400) and without (n = 136,550) endometriosis between 2000 and 2021. Baseline characteristics, comorbidities and pregnancy outcomes were compared between the groups. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to calculate adjusted relative risks (aRR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) for various pregnancy outcomes, and subgroup analyses were conducted by maternal age and infertility status. Among 147,950 pregnancies, women with endometriosis [mean ± standard deviation (SD) age 32.38 ± 4.51 years] had higher socio-economic status, more comorbidities, and more surgical history compared with women without endometriosis (mean ± SD age 30.06 ± 4.96 years). Women with endometriosis had increased risk of miscarriage (aRR 1.13, 95 % CI 1.03-1.24), preterm birth (aRR 1.31, 95 % CI 1.26-1.37), premature rupture of membranes (aRR 1.11, 95 % CI 1.06-1.16), placenta previa (aRR 1.63, 95 % CI 1.45-1.84), urinary tract infection (aRR 1.44, 95 % CI 1.31-1.59), and caesarean section (aRR 1.13, 95 % CI 1.11-1.16). Subgroup analysis revealed that risk of miscarriage was only higher in women aged 35-45 years and women without infertility. Risks of preterm birth, placenta previa and caesarean section were elevated across all subgroups, suggesting that endometriosis contributes independently to adverse pregnancy outcomes. Endometriosis is an independent risk factor for several pregnancy complications, supporting the need for tailored prenatal care and closer monitoring of affected women to improve maternal outcomes.