The concept that a cervix could be inadequate or incompetent for retaining a normal pregnancy was publicized by Lash and Lash in 1950. It did not catch the fancy of the majority of obstetricians to any extent until the introduction of the relatively simple corrective procedure advocated by Shirodkar in 1955 and publicized by Barter et al. Since then there has been a constantly increasing number of reports discussing this problem. Incompetent cervical os is estimated to represent only a small percentage of all causes of fetal wastage …
PMID 5944836 5944836 DOI 10.1097/00003081-196608000-00010 10.1097/00003081-196608000-00010 Sherman et al. 1966, Sherman 1966
Cite this article
Sherman, A. I. (1966). Hormonal therapy for control of the incompetent os of pregnancy. Obstetrics and gynecology, 28(2), 198-205. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003081-196608000-00010
Sherman AI. Hormonal therapy for control of the incompetent os of pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1966;28(2):198-205. doi:10.1097/00003081-196608000-00010
Sherman, Alfred I. "Hormonal therapy for control of the incompetent os of pregnancy." Obstetrics and gynecology, vol. 28, no. 2, 1966, pp. 198-205.
Cervical incompetence is one of the main contributors to repeated pregnancy loss, accounting for approximately 25% of the cases. Typically it results in progressive cervical dilatation, leading to a painless second- or early-third-trimester abortion. In most instances cervical incompetence is the result of previous obstetric or gynecologic trauma; a congenital etiology is unusual. Despite the various reported diagnostic procedures, the obstetric history and frequent visual and digital examinations during pregnancy remain the most important factors in arriving at the correct diagnosis. In spite of the fact that numerous procedures have been advocated as treatment, the McDonald purse string closure technique is by far the most simple and effective corrective surgical technique, yielding an overwhelming number of successful pregnancies.
Cervical cerclage as a temporizing measure for the treatment of patients with placenta previa was evaluated in 25 patients admitted to the hospital for vaginal bleeding between 24-30 weeks' gestation and sonographic evidence of a placenta previa. The patients were randomly assigned to either cerclage (13) or conventional management (12). Cerclage patients had significantly better perinatal outcome, as indicated by more advanced gestational age at the time of delivery (34.9 +/- 3.0 versus 31.6 +/- 2.9 weeks; P = .02), larger birth weight (2709 +/- 511 versus 1812 +/- 506 g; P = .002), and fewer neonatal complications (two of 13 versus ten of 12 infants; P = .001). Maternal bleeding was more frequent and severe for patients in the control group. The total hospital cost was less for cerclage patients than for those receiving conventional expectant management ($9898 +/- 3943 versus $27,271 +/- 9901; P = .02). These results support the use of cervical cerclage for the treatment of patients with symptomatic placenta previa early in gestation.
birth-and-delivery/birth-outcomes/maternal-morbiditypregnancy/pregnancy-complications/premature-rupture-of-membranes
Open Access
Dotters-Katz SK et al., 2017·Obstetrics and gynecology
To identify risk factors for maternal morbidity after previable prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM). We conducted a case-control study of singleton and twin pregnancies complicated by previable PROM (14.0-22.9 weeks of gestation) at a single tertiary care referral institution, 2000-2015. Pregnancies complicated by fetal anomalies, previable PROM within 2 weeks of chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis, and those with contraindications to expectant management (eg, chorioamnionitis) were excluded. Cases were women with the primary outcome of composite maternal morbidity (defined as having at one or more of the following: sepsis, intensive care unit admission, acute renal insufficiency, uterine curettage, hysterectomy, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolus, blood transfusion, readmission, or maternal death). Controls were women without the primary composite morbidity. Bivariate analysis compared demographic, clinical, and management characteristics of women in the case group and those in the control group. Multivariable logistic regression models were developed to quantify the association between maternal characteristics and composite severe maternal morbidity. During the study period, 174 women presented with by previable PROM and were candidates for expectant management. Sixty-five (37%) women opted for immediate delivery; 109 (63%) elected expectant management. Twenty-five of 174 (14%) experienced one or more components of the composite maternal morbidity (cases) and were compared with 149 (86%) women in the control group. Women in the case group were more not more likely to elect expectant management (68% compared with 59%, P=.40), but were more likely to be aged 35 years or older (40% compared with 14%, P=.002) or to be carrying twins (52% compared with 16%, P<.01). In the regression model, twin gestation and age 35 years or older were both significantly associated with increased odds of composite maternal morbidity (odds ratio [OR] 5.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.21-14.3 and OR 4.00, 95% CI 1.48-10.8, respectively). Antenatal counseling of women with previable PROM should include that one in seven women experience significant morbidity. Although expectant management was not associated with increased risk in this cohort, women with twins or those aged 35 years or older were at substantially increased risk.
To estimate the risk of adverse outcomes in women whose first day of the last menstrual period (LMP) was unreliable. Among 20,244 singleton pregnancies with measurements of biparietal diameter between 12 and 22 weeks' gestation, LMP was registered as unreliable in 3775 (18.6%) and reliable in 16,469 (81.4%). Adverse outcomes were defined as spontaneous or missed abortions after 12 weeks' gestation, stillbirth or postnatal death within 1 year, preterm birth, birth weight less than 2500 g, and low birth weight (LBW) for gestation (lower than 22% below sex-specific expected weight). Logistic regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were used to analyze the risk of adverse outcomes. The risk of death was doubled in pregnant women with unreliable LMPs compared with those with reliable LMPs (odds ratio [OR] 2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5, 2.6). This risk was highest with respect to stillbirth (OR 2.7; 95% CI 1.7, 4.3). The risks of preterm birth, LBW, and LBW for gestation were also significantly increased (ORs 1.5, 1.4, and 1.2; 95% CIs 1.3, 1.7; 1.2, 1.6; and 1. 0, 1.4, respectively). An unreliable LMP is associated with increased risk of adverse outcomes, especially fetal death.