Competing Factors Link to Bone Health in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Chronic  Low-Grade Inflammation Takes a Toll

Shirin Kalyan; Millan S Patel; Elaine Kingwell; Hélène C F Côté; Danmei Liu; Jerilynn C Prior

doi:10.1038/s41598-017-03685-x

Bone Health · Bone Mineral Density

Competing Factors Link to Bone Health in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Chronic Low-Grade Inflammation Takes a Toll

Kalyan S, Patel MS, Kingwell E, Côté HCF, Liu D, Prior JC

Published June 15, 2017 Scientific Reports, 7(1), 3432

DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-03685-x PMID 28611442 PMC PMC5469792

Abstract

Chronic inflammation predisposes to poor bone health. Women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) experience androgen excess, ovulatory disturbances, insulin resistance, abdominal adiposity and chronic inflammation. Our objective was to investigate the relationships among bone health parameters, chronic subclinical inflammation and anthropometric measures in premenopausal women with and without PCOS. In 61 premenopausal women, 22 women with PCOS and 39 controls, we assessed bone parameters (total hip bone mineral density [BMD] by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and radius strength-strain index [SSI] by peripheral quantitative computed tomography), inflammation (C-reactive protein/albumin), oxidative stress (leukocyte telomere length, urinary 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine); hemoglobin A1c; anthropometric measures (body mass index, waist-to-height ratio, cross-sectional muscle area). A diagnosis of PCOS negatively predicted (beta = -0.251, p = 0.022) hip BMD in a regression model including weight. In women with PCOS, inflammation, which was predicted by increased waist-to-height ratio and current use of oral contraceptives, attenuated the positive influences of increased weight and muscle mass on bone strength and was inversely associated with radial SSI (R(2) = 0.25, p = 0.018). In conclusion, chronic subclinical inflammation may negatively impact bone physiology in women with PCOS. Strategies focused on reducing abdominal adiposity and avoiding medications that increase inflammation may counter this effect.

Topics

Bone Health Bone Mineral Density Measurement

By this author

Luteal Phase · Luteal Phase Deficiency

The influence of the menstrual cycle on muscle injuries - a systematic review and meta-analysis

Guthardt Y et al., 2026 Sci Rep Free full text on PubMed Central

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the relationship between menstrual cycle phases and the incidence of muscle injuries in female team sport athletes, following PRISMA 2020 and PERSiST guidelines. A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and SPORTDiscus from inception to mid-January 2024. Studies were included if they examined female team sport athletes of reproductive age with regular menstrual cycles and compared the occurrence of muscle injuries across at least two menstrual phases. Studies involving hormonal contraceptive use, medications affecting the menstrual cycle or musculoskeletal system, or menstrual dysfunction were excluded. Three studies met the inclusion criteria, involving 318 participants. Meta-analysis yielded a pooled Risk Ratio of 1.18 (95% CI: 0.75 to 1.86, p = 0.46) for injury risk between the luteal and follicular phases, suggesting no statistically significant association. However, the certainty of the cumulative evidence was rated as very low due to methodological limitations, including inconsistent phase classifications and reliance on imprecise methods for identifying menstrual phases. Consequently, no practical or clinical recommendations can be made at this time. Future research employing standardised, physiologically accurate methods for classifying and detecting menstrual cycle phases is necessary to better understand the potential links between hormonal fluctuations and injury risk.

Breast Health · Benign Breast Conditions

MON-154 Breast areolar diameter in healthy menstruating women—a single cycle cross-sectional study of associations with body size and ovulatory characteristics

Baaske AV et al., 2025 Journal of the Endocrine Society Free full text on PubMed Central

Tanner Breast Stage 3 (TB3, at menarche) and Tanner 5 (TB5, once ovulatory cycles established), despite being similar with an “upstanding” nipple, are different. Evidence suggests that steady and high ovulatory-level progesterone exposure accounts for the larger areolar diameter in TB5. Progesterone levels indicate whether the menstrual cycle is ovulatory and have crucial implications for women’s reproductive, metabolic, cardiovascular, and bone health. However, few data show average areolar diameter in regularly cycling women in whom SES, body size, and reproductive variables have been documented. As a step towards better understanding the role of areolar diameter in reflecting estradiol-progesterone balance, this study aims to document the average mean bilateral lateral areolar diameter (AD) in a cohort of regularly menstruating, premenopausal women in whom ovulation was documented in one cycle. We also aim to describe relationships between AD and demographic, anthropometric, and reproductive/ovulation variables. Women were eligible if aged 19-35 years with about month-apart cycles and no exogenous hormone use in the last 3-months. Participants completed one cycle with a daily Menstrual Cycle Diary© (cycle length, CL) and first morning temperatures for Quantitative Basal Temperature© (QBT©) ovulation analysis (normal luteal phase length ≥10 days). Questionnaires gathered SES, ethnic, general health, and reproductive characteristics. Bilateral horizontal areolar diameters were measured by a woman researcher with the participant supine in a warm room. From February 2020 to September 2022 (during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic), 73 women from Metro Vancouver, British Columbia participated. Women were of median (min-max) age 30 (19-35) years, BMI 24.5 (17.1-41.4) and most identified as White (61.6%) with a median of 16 years of education. Median CL was 29 days (n=65) and QBT data showed 39.3% were normally ovulatory, 34.4% had short luteal phases and 26.2% were anovulatory. Median within-woman bilateral AD was 3.85 (2.35-8.00) cm. Left AD exceeded right (L 3.8 [2.3,8.2]; R 3.7 [ 2.4,7.8]; P=.003). Larger AD (≥3.85cm) was associated with greater body size (BMI r=.534), weight and waist circumference. However, earlier age at menarche (P=.02) was also significantly associated. No other reproductive variables (cycle length, luteal phase length, parity, ever use of CHC) were related to AD before body size adjustments. This study is the first to document, and describe demographic, anthropomorphic and reproductive associations with, AD in community dwelling, regularly cycling, premenopausal women. Future steps will determine the most influential of the anthropometric variables; adjustment for these will facilitate assessments of associations with ovulation related characteristics.

Breast Health · Benign Breast Conditions

SAT-128 Prospective 1-year Menstrual CycleBreast Tenderness and Swelling Experiences—data from healthy regularly cycling women initially proven normally ovulatory on two consecutive cycles

Wood M et al., 2025 Journal of the Endocrine Society Free full text on PubMed Central

Breast tenderness and swelling are associated with premenstrual symptoms but have not been well described in healthy, normally cycling women with known ovulatory status. There are documented negative health risks (in bone, the cardiovascular system and cancers) in association with ovulatory disturbances within normal-length cycles. Identifying breast changes across a predictable, month-apart cycle but with Subclinical Ovulatory Disturbances (SOD, short luteal phase [<10 days] and anovulation (with normal estradiol but lower or absent progesterone levels) could advance our understanding of menstrual cycle physiology, women’s health education and identification of those with chronic SOD who may benefit from cyclic progesterone therapy. Our objective was to determine whether within-woman breast tenderness and swelling experiences differed between normally ovulatory and ovulatory-disturbed cycles. In this 1-year prospective observational study, we examined daily breast tenderness (0-4) and swelling (1-5 change from usual = 3) experiences recorded via the Menstrual Cycle Diary© over ≥8 cycles (mean=13/woman) in 53 women. Ovulatory status was documented by the twice-validated Quantitative Basal Temperature© (QBT©) analysis. Cycle and ovulatory data were previously reported (Prior NEJM, 1990); Diary data were unreported. Participants were healthy, community-dwelling women, mean age 34 (32.4:35.5 years), BMI 22.0, primarily White, and about two-thirds were runners (for health or were marathon-training). Comparison of breast parameters in all normally ovulatory (n = 495) vs all SOD cycles (n = 199) (mean cycle length 28.1 [27.5-28.8 days]), showed significantly higher Breast Tenderness Score [intensity X days; 6.0 (range 1.0, 14.0) vs. 3.0 (0.0, 11.0) (P = .001)] and increased breast size [4.0 (2.0, 4.0) vs. 4.0 (0.0, 4.0) (P = .034]) in normally ovulatory cycles. However, in within-woman analysis (n = 47 women with both normally ovulatory and SOD cycles), breast tenderness/swelling did not significantly differ by ovulatory status. We plotted all ovulatory cycles (n=676) centred on ovulation; this revealed parallel timing of increases in breast tenderness and swelling in the late luteal phase. These 1-year prospective data documented that mild breast tenderness and swelling occurred before flow in cycles with normal ovulation; symptoms were less in SOD cycles. Breast changes were totally absent during the follicular phases.

Hormonal Agents · Progesterone and Progestins

"SUN-109 Feasibility of Cyclic Progesterone and Spironolactone for PCOS-specific Health-Related Quality of Life—a six-month, Phase II, single arm, single center, open-label study"

Nelson K et al., 2025 J Endocr Soc Free full text on PubMed Central

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is an endocrine-metabolic disorder that significantly decreases health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Combined hormonal contraceptives (CHC) are standard-of-care for PCOS but do not mitigate the neuroendocrine cause nor women’s primary concerns. Treatment options need expansion. We hypothesized cyclic oral micronized progesterone (CyclicP4) and spironolactone (Sp) would improve HRQoL, decrease LH, and acne. This Phase II, open-label single-arm pilot study evaluated the 6-month cyclicP4 and Sp treatment feasibility and safety in androgenic PCOS. Our primary outcome was within-woman change in PCOS-HRQoL (PCOSQ). No sample size calculation was possible; 40 was considered feasible. Eligible women were 19-40 years with physician-diagnosed androgenic PCOS. Exclusion criteria included HbA1c > 6.4%, use of metformin or CHC in the last month. Participants received progesterone (300 mg/bedtime 14 days/month); spironolactone (200 mg/day) began in cycle two. Adherence was tracked daily (Menstrual Cycle Diary©) and by pill counts. Safety was assessed by post-study potassium (K+). Feasibility by women’s post-trial treatment intention. PCOSQ, serum LH, calculated bioavailable testosterone (cBAT), HbA1c, hsCRP, and AMH were measured at baseline and trial end. We also assessed perceived acne and sleep changes (-5 to +5), K+ and therapy intent at study end. Six-month change by paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank assessed P < .05 as important. Of 109 expressing interest, 41 enrolled, 36 began therapy (5 did not), and 26 provided final questionnaire data (19 with complete lab data). Completing women were mean age 29 (SD 4.9) years, BMI 30.3 (8.1), 61.5% White and 73.1% with university degrees. Total PCOSQ scores within-woman increased from 3.5±1.0 to 4.9±1.1 (95% CI 3.1-3.8, 4.6-5.3; P<.0000001). Each PCOSQ domain significantly improved (at least P<.001) as did acne and sleep. Weight was unchanged but waist circumference decreased 1.1 cm (NS). LH, cBAT, and AMH each decreased: LH 10.0±5.4 to 8.5±5.2 IU/L (95% CI 7.6-12.3, 6.3-10.8; P<.4), cBAT 0.7±0.4 to 0.6±0.3 nmol/L (0.5-0.9, 0.5-0.8; P<.2), and AMH 10.5±6.5 to 9.7±5.7 ng/ml (7.4-13.7, 7.0-12.4; P<.4). hsCRP remained unchanged (2.8±3.3 to 2.7±3.6 mg/L; P<.8) as did HbA1c (5.2±0.3 to 5.2±0.3%; P<.0). K+ remained within the normal range (3.5-5.0 mmol/L) at final testing (mean 4.0). Two allergic responses to spironolactone and one frequent flow/religious practice led to discontinuation. Feasibility was confirmed and participants strongly preferred continuing therapy (median Likert score=6/7, P<.0001) CyclicP4 and Sp for 6-months was feasible and significantly improved HRQoL in a non-medicine-seeking community women cohort with androgenic PCOS. Though the small sample size limited generalizability, findings are promising. A larger randomized trial comparing CyclicP4 vs. CHC is warranted.

Related research

Hormones and Bone · Contraceptive Effects on Bone

Bone health and prevalent fractures in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a meta-analysis and endocrine-context pathophysiology review

Prior JC et al., 2023 Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab

Bone health in those with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) is complex, but the general consensus is that cortical areal bone mineral density (aBMD) sites will be higher in PCOS than in ageand BMI-similar controls. However, spine aBMD sites may be lower, especially in non-obese PCOS. Whether or not incident fracture risk is increased in PCOS is currently controversial; no meta-analysis has yet assessed prevalent fractures. We assessed the bone effects of PCOS-related ovarian hormone alterations, e.g. androgen excess, tonically normal/higher estradiol, and lower-than-normal progesterone levels. We also highlighted evidence that common PCOS medications (e.g. combined hormonal contraceptives [CHC], metformin, and spironolactone) have important bone effects. In adolescents, meta-analysis of CHC showed significant negative aBMD changes. Inflammation has negative PCOS bone effects and is linked with CHC use. EXPERT Opinion: Is fracture risk altered by PCOS? Our meta-analysis showed a 25% increased risk of prevalent fracture in PCOS versus controls; this did not reach statistical significance. Future prospective research needs to collect and evaluate ovulation characteristics, progesterone exposure, and adolescent CHC use, in addition to the complex variables that may influence risks for prevalent or incident fragility fractures and/or for cortical and cancellous aBMD values in PCOS.

Bone Mineral Density · Measurement

Physical activity, body mass index and bone mineral density-associations in a prospective population-based cohort of women and men: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos)

Langsetmo L et al., 2012 Bone Free full text on PubMed Central

Physical activity (PA) is an important modifiable risk factor for both bone mineral density (BMD) and body mass index (BMI). However, BMI is itself strongly predictive of BMD. Our aim was to determine the association between PA and BMD, with consideration of BMI as a potential mediating factor. The Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos) is a population-based prospective cohort study of Canadian women and men. PA was determined from interviewer-administered questionnaires at baseline and Year 5 and summarized as daily energy expenditure in total metabolic equivalents of the task multiplied by minutes/day (MET*m/d). Height, weight, and total hip and lumbar spine BMD were measured at baseline and Year 5. General linear models assessed relationships between PA and BMD, both cross-sectionally (baseline PA with baseline BMD) and longitudinally (average PA and change in PA with change in BMD). BMI was considered as a mediating factor. Potential confounders included age, center, education, caffeine intake, alcohol exposure, smoking history, history of weight-cycling, age at menarche, past use of oral contraceptives, history of >3 months missed menstruation, menopausal status, and antiresorptive use, as relevant. The study included 2855 men and 6442 women. PA was inversely associated with BMI at baseline, and an increase in PA between baseline and Year 5 was associated with a decrease in BMI, with 0.41 (95% CI: 0.22, 0.60) kg/m(2) loss per 1000 MET*m/d increase (in men) and 0.40 (95% CI: 0.23, 0.57) kg/m(2) loss per 1000 MET*m/d increase (in women). BMI was strongly associated with BMD, both cross-sectionally and longitudinally. However, increased PA was associated with a small increase in total hip BMD, 0.004 (95% CI: 0.000-0.008) g/cm(2) per 1000 MET*m/d (in men) and 0.003 (95% CI: 0.000-0.007) g/cm(2) per 1000 MET*m/d (in women). Average PA was associated with an increase in lumbar spine BMD in women, but not in men; it was not associated with change in total hip BMD in either sex. Increased PA is associated with an increase in BMD and a concomitant decrease in BMI. These findings suggest that population-level interventions to increase PA would favorably impact bone and other health outcomes.

Fracture Risk · Risk Factors

A meta-analysis of the association of fracture risk and body mass index in women

Johansson H et al., 2014 J Bone Miner Res

Several recent studies suggest that obesity may be a risk factor for fracture. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between body mass index (BMI) and future fracture risk at different skeletal sites. In prospective cohorts from more than 25 countries, baseline data on BMI were available in 398,610 women with an average age of 63 (range, 20-105) years and follow up of 2.2 million person-years during which 30,280 osteoporotic fractures (6457 hip fractures) occurred. Femoral neck BMD was measured in 108,267 of these women. Obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m(2) ) was present in 22%. A majority of osteoporotic fractures (81%) and hip fractures (87%) arose in non-obese women. Compared to a BMI of 25 kg/m(2) , the hazard ratio (HR) for osteoporotic fracture at a BMI of 35 kg/m(2) was 0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85-0.90). When adjusted for bone mineral density (BMD), however, the same comparison showed that the HR for osteoporotic fracture was increased (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.09-1.23). Low BMI is a risk factor for hip and all osteoporotic fracture, but is a protective factor for lower leg fracture, whereas high BMI is a risk factor for upper arm (humerus and elbow) fracture. When adjusted for BMD, low BMI remained a risk factor for hip fracture but was protective for osteoporotic fracture, tibia and fibula fracture, distal forearm fracture, and upper arm fracture. When adjusted for BMD, high BMI remained a risk factor for upper arm fracture but was also a risk factor for all osteoporotic fractures. The association between BMI and fracture risk is complex, differs across skeletal sites, and is modified by the interaction between BMI and BMD. At a population level, high BMI remains a protective factor for most sites of fragility fracture. The contribution of increasing population rates of obesity to apparent decreases in fracture rates should be explored.

Osteoporosis · Diagnosis and Treatment

Should risk of bone fragility restrict weight control for other health reasons in postmenopausal women?--A ten year prospective study

Sirola J et al., 2012 Maturitas

The aim of the present study was to investigate the health risks of excess body weight in the light of its protective effects on bone fragility. Femoral neck and lumbar spine dual X-ray absorptiometry was performed for 1970 Finnish women with a mean baseline age of 58.8 years (range 53.1-65.7 years) in 1994 and 2004. Women were categorized according to baseline BMI into normal <25 kg/m2, overweight 25-29.9 kg/m(2) and obese ≥30 kg/m(2). Weight change (kg) was categorized into tertiles. Co-morbidities, not allowed to be present at baseline, was based on self-reports. Osteoporosis was defined as femoral neck or spinal (L2-L4) T-score <-2.5 SD at 10-year follow-up or <-2.0 SD+low trauma energy follow-up fracture. Uniand multivariate logistic regression models were used to estimate the 10-year risk of incident health disorders. Adjustment for age, number of diseases, alcohol intake and smoking was used in the multivariate models. Obesity (Ob) and overweight (Ow) were related with higher 10-year risk of hypertension (OR=2.6 (Ob)/OR=1.7 (Ow), p<0.001), coronary artery disease (OR=1.6, p<0.05/OR=1.2, p=NS), diabetes (OR=11.7/OR=5.3, p<0.001), osteoarthritis (OR=1.4, p<0.05/OR=1.1, p=NS), chronic back pain (OR=1.6, p=0.007/OR=1.2, p=NS) and poor self-rated health (OR=2.4, p<0.05/OR=1.5, p=NS) and lower risk of osteoporosis (OR=0.13/OR=0.28, p<0.001). Weight change of less than +1 kg was associated 1.8 and 2.6 times lower 10-year risk of having hypertension and breast cancer than weight change over 6.2 kg. Among obese women the absolute risk increase of hypertension was 17%, of diabetes 12%, and absolute risk reduction of osteoporosis 14% in comparison to BMI <25 kg/m(2). Health related risks of high BMI outweigh its protective effects on bone. Weight gain increases the risk hypertension and breast cancer.

Bone Health › Bone Mineral Density › Measurement

Shirin Kalyan, Millan S Patel, Elaine Kingwell, Danmei Liu, Jerilynn C Prior

S Kalyan, M Patel, E Kingwell, D Liu, J Prior

PMID 28611442 28611442 DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-03685-x 10.1038/s41598-017-03685-x Kalyan et al. 2017, Kalyan 2017

Cite this article

Kalyan, S., Patel, M. S., Kingwell, E., Côté, H. C. F., Liu, D., & Prior, J. C. (2017). Competing Factors Link to Bone Health in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Chronic Low-Grade Inflammation Takes a Toll. Scientific reports, 7(1), 3432. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03685-x

Keywords

Biomarkers, C-Reactive Protein