To investigate the effect of cell phone use on various markers of semen quality.
Design
Observational study.
Setting
Infertility clinic.
PATIENT(S): Three hundred sixty-one men undergoing infertility evaluation were divided into four groups according to their active cell phone use: group A: no use; group B: <2 h/day; group C: 2-4 h/day; and group D: >4 h/day.
INTERVENTION(S): None.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Sperm parameters (volume, liquefaction time, pH, viscosity, sperm count, motility, viability, and morphology).
RESULT(S): The comparisons of mean sperm count, motility, viability, and normal morphology among four different cell phone user groups were statistically significant. Mean sperm motility, viability, and normal morphology were significantly different in cell phone user groups within two sperm count groups. The laboratory values of the above four sperm parameters decreased in all four cell phone user groups as the duration of daily exposure to cell phones increased.
CONCLUSION(S): Use of cell phones decrease the semen quality in men by decreasing the sperm count, motility, viability, and normal morphology. The decrease in sperm parameters was dependent on the duration of daily exposure to cell phones and independent of the initial semen quality.
PMID 17482179 17482179 DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.01.166 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.01.166 Agarwal et al. 2008, Agarwal 2008
Cite this article
Agarwal, A., Deepinder, F., Sharma, R. K., Ranga, G., & Li, J. (2008). Effect of cell phone usage on semen analysis in men attending infertility clinic: an observational study.. Fertility and sterility, 89(1), 124-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.01.166
Agarwal A, Deepinder F, Sharma RK, Ranga G, Li J. Effect of cell phone usage on semen analysis in men attending infertility clinic: an observational study.. Fertility and sterility. 2008;89(1):124-8. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.01.166
Related articles
Environmental Exposures · Radiation and Electromagnetic Exposure
Agarwal A et al., 2011·International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
Cell phones have become a vital part of everyday life. However, the health risks associated with their usage are often overlooked. Recently, evidence from several studies supports a growing claim that cell phone usage may have a detrimental effect on sperm parameters leading to decreased male fertility. Nonetheless, other studies showed no conclusive link between male infertility and cell phone usage. The ambiguity of such results is attributed to the lack of a centralized assay for measuring inflicted damage caused by cell phones. Study design, ethics, and reproducibility are all aspects which must be standardized before any conclusions can be made.
To determine whether urine bisphenol-A (BPA) levels are associated with lower semen quality. Cohort study. Four regions in China where high exposure to BPA in the workplace existed. PATIENT(S): 218 men with and without BPA exposure in the workplace. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Semen parameters. RESULT(S): After adjustment for potential confounders using linear regression, increasing urine BPA level was statistically significantly associated with [1] decreased sperm concentration, [2] decreased total sperm count, [3] decreased sperm vitality, and [4] decreased sperm motility. Compared with men who did not have detectable urine BPA levels, those with detectable urine BPA had more than three times the risk of lowered sperm concentration and lower sperm vitality, more than four times the risk of lower sperm count, and more than twice the risk of lower sperm motility. The urine BPA level was not associated with semen volume or abnormal sperm morphology. Similar dose-response associations were observed among men with environmental BPA exposure at levels comparable with those in the U.S population. Despite a markedly reduced sample size, the inverse correlation between increased urine BPA levels and decreased sperm concentration and total sperm count remained statistically significant. CONCLUSION(S): These results provide the first epidemiologic evidence of an adverse effect of BPA on semen quality.
Russo LM et al., 2025·Ecotoxicol Environ Saf·
Open Access
Prior studies have observed impacts of air pollution on semen quality, but timing of exposure during developmental windows of spermatogenesis and impacts of low-to-moderate air pollution is less well understood. We examined the relation between air pollution and semen quality in the Folic Acid and Zinc Supplementation Trial (2013-2018), which enrolled male partners of couples seeking infertility treatment in the Salt Lake City, Utah region (n = 2015). Semen quality parameters were assessed at baseline, 2-, 4-, and 6-months follow-up. Measures of daily air pollutants at each participant's residence were abstracted from Community Multiscale Air Quality models (fine particulate matter: PM2.5, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, and ozone: O3), linked to participants' residential addresses, and averaged across the 74-day spermatogenesis window prior to the sample collection date for each study visit, and across four developmental windows of spermatogenesis (mitosis, meiosis I-II, spermiogenesis, and spermiation). Generalized linear mixed models considered four repeated semen sample measures per participant and adjusted for co-pollutants, age, season, and income. In multi-pollutant models, O3 during early-to-mid spermatogenesis (meiosis I+II and spermiogenesis) was related to lower percent normal morphology (% difference -6.73, 95 % CI -9.82, -3.54 and % difference -3.83, 95 % CI -7.51, 0.00, respectively). Additionally, PM2.5 and O3 during late spermatogenesis (spermiation) were associated with lower count and concentration, and PM2.5 with lower progressive motility. These findings suggest that exposure to low-to-moderate levels of air pollution may negatively impact semen quality and indicate that exposure to O3 during meiosis and spermiogenesis may particularly affect normal sperm morphological development.
Environmental Exposures · Plastics and Microplastics
Microplastics (MPs) are becoming one of the most serious environmental threats worldwide. They have been shown to induce male reproductive toxicity in animal studies. However, evidence of their adverse effects on male reproductive health in human is still lacking. In this study, we evaluated the presence of MPs in human semen and explored their associations with semen quality. A total of 45 semen samples from men attending a fertility center were collected. MPs in the semen samples were analyzed by laser direct infrared (LD-IR) spectroscopy. MPs were found in 34 out of 45 semen samples, with an average abundance of 17.0 (42.0) particles/g. The size of MPs ranged from 20.3 μm to 189.7 μm and the majority (57.8%) were smaller than 50 μm. A total of 15 distinct MPs polymers were identified, and polyethylene (PET) accounted for 35.9% of the total amount of MPs, followed by butadiene rubber (BR, 26.4%) and chlorinated polyethylene (CPE, 12.2%). Analysis of the association of MP exposure with semen quality showed that participants exposed to PET MPs experienced a reduction in sperm progressive motility (20.6% ± 12.8% vs. 34.9% ± 15.9%, p = 0.056). However, no significant association was found between MP exposure and sperm concentration or total sperm count. Our findings confirmed the presence of MPs in human semen and suggested that MP exposure might have adverse impacts on male reproductive health. However, further large-scale studies are needed to confirm these findings.