Endometriosis Surgical Treatment

Endometriosis Surgery: Debates About Restorative Reproductive Medicine

Humphries LA

Published February 2026 Obstetrics and gynecology, 147(2), 169-173
DOI 10.1097/AOG.0000000000006151 PMID 41411651

RRM Academy Synopsis

Review Argues No Evidence Supports Endometriosis Surgery Replacing IVF

Critical to restorative reproductive medicine

A 2026 review argues that nothing in the evidence supports using endometriosis surgery in place of IVF.

Study at a glance, review by one author: Review says no evidence supports surgery in place of IVF
Study at a glance, review by one author: Review says no evidence supports surgery in place of IVF. Source: Humphries LA, 2026, PMID 41411651.

Key Findings

  • The author holds that for many people with endometriosis, laparoscopic surgery gives the strongest relief from severe, ongoing pelvic pain.
  • The author says a woman who wants to conceive should settle the surgery question with her obstetrician-gynecologist, on clear medical grounds.
  • The author names religious and political groups as the source of RRM and calls its claims about endometriosis surgery unfounded.
  • The author concludes that surgery's place in fertility care differs by patient, depending on symptoms, goals and priorities.

Interpretation

The source is a review by one author in a clinical journal. The author states a view on surgery, IVF and the restorative framework. The author also states a view on the motives of groups that use that framework. Studies that compare surgery and IVF for fertility would help test the author's view.

RRM Context

RRM rests on four ideas: work with the body, find the root cause, evaluate first, and chart the cycle. The author says the surgery choice should rest on clear medical grounds set between the patient and her doctor. That point fits the RRM idea of evaluation before treatment.

Abstract

For many patients with endometriosis, laparoscopic surgery is the most effective treatment to alleviate severe chronic pelvic pain and improve quality of life. Because endometriosis is common among individuals with infertility, surgery is often considered alongside fertility evaluation and treatment to manage symptoms, identify disease pathology, and restore pelvic anatomy. In patients who desire pregnancy, the decision of whether and when to pursue surgery should be guided by clear medical indications and shared decision making between the patient and their obstetrician-gynecologist. In recent months, however, religious and political groups have sought to reframe this medical decision as an ideologic and moral one, advocating for endometriosis surgery in nearly all patients with infertility and claiming that this can eliminate the need for assisted reproductive technologies. This framework, known as restorative reproductive medicine (RRM), aligns with efforts to promote the "personhood" of fertilized eggs, restrict access to in in vitro fertilization (IVF), and advance endometriosis surgery and lifestyle modifications as "root-cause treatment leading to natural fertility." Recent editorials and issue briefs in the obstetrics and gynecology literature have discussed the serious ethical, medical, and policy implications of RRM, yet there remains an urgent need to address specifically the unfounded claims about endometriosis surgery and its purported advantages over assisted reproductive technology. This article examines the social context of this controversy and reviews the current evidence regarding the indications, benefits, and limitations of endometriosis surgery in the management of infertility. In contrast to RRM's assertions, no evidence supports the adoption of endometriosis surgery as a replacement for IVF or as a primary treatment for infertility. Rather, the role of surgery in fertility care is highly nuanced and depends on each patient's clinical presentation, reproductive goals, and personal priorities.

Read the guides

Topics

By this author

Related research

Endometriosis › Surgical Treatment › Fertility Sparing Technique · Restorative Reproductive Medicine › Restorative Care and Assisted Reproduction › Outcome Comparisons · General Gynecology › Pelvic Pain › Chronic Pelvic Pain
Leigh Ann Humphries
L Humphries
PMID 41411651 41411651 DOI 10.1097/AOG.0000000000006151 10.1097/AOG.0000000000006151 Humphries et al. 2026, Humphries 2026