Humphries, L. A. (2026). Endometriosis Surgery: Debates About Restorative Reproductive Medicine. Obstetrics and gynecology, 147(2), 169-173. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000006151
Humphries LA. Endometriosis Surgery: Debates About Restorative Reproductive Medicine. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2026;147(2):169-173. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000006151
Humphries, Leigh Ann. "Endometriosis Surgery: Debates About Restorative Reproductive Medicine." Obstetrics and gynecology, vol. 147, no. 2, 2026, pp. 169-173.
For EndNote, Zotero or Mendeley:
License
Open-access status not yet checked.
Author affiliations
1 institution
National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death016knsn07
Linked to ROR, the Research Organization Registry
RRM Academy Synopsis
Review Argues No Evidence Supports Endometriosis Surgery Replacing IVF
Critical to restorative reproductive medicine
A 2026 review argues that nothing in the evidence supports using endometriosis surgery in place of IVF.
Study at a glance, review by one author: Review says no evidence supports surgery in place of IVF. Source: Humphries LA, 2026, PMID 41411651.
Key Findings
The author holds that for many people with endometriosis, laparoscopic surgery gives the strongest relief from severe, ongoing pelvic pain.
The author says a woman who wants to conceive should settle the surgery question with her obstetrician-gynecologist, on clear medical grounds.
The author names religious and political groups as the source of RRM and calls its claims about endometriosis surgery unfounded.
The author concludes that surgery's place in fertility care differs by patient, depending on symptoms, goals and priorities.
Interpretation
The source is a review by one author in a clinical journal. The author states a view on surgery, IVF and the restorative framework. The author also states a view on the motives of groups that use that framework. Studies that compare surgery and IVF for fertility would help test the author's view.
RRM Context
RRM rests on four ideas: work with the body, find the root cause, evaluate first, and chart the cycle. The author says the surgery choice should rest on clear medical grounds set between the patient and her doctor. That point fits the RRM idea of evaluation before treatment.
Our editorial summary of this paper, not the article's abstract.
Abstract
For many patients with endometriosis, laparoscopic surgery is the most effective treatment to alleviate severe chronic pelvic pain and improve quality of life. Because endometriosis is common among individuals with infertility, surgery is often considered alongside fertility evaluation and treatment to manage symptoms, identify disease pathology, and restore pelvic anatomy. In patients who desire pregnancy, the decision of whether and when to pursue surgery should be guided by clear medical indications and shared decision making between the patient and their obstetrician-gynecologist. In recent months, however, religious and political groups have sought to reframe this medical decision as an ideologic and moral one, advocating for endometriosis surgery in nearly all patients with infertility and claiming that this can eliminate the need for assisted reproductive technologies. This framework, known as restorative reproductive medicine (RRM), aligns with efforts to promote the "personhood" of fertilized eggs, restrict access to in in vitro fertilization (IVF), and advance endometriosis surgery and lifestyle modifications as "root-cause treatment leading to natural fertility." Recent editorials and issue briefs in the obstetrics and gynecology literature have discussed the serious ethical, medical, and policy implications of RRM, yet there remains an urgent need to address specifically the unfounded claims about endometriosis surgery and its purported advantages over assisted reproductive technology. This article examines the social context of this controversy and reviews the current evidence regarding the indications, benefits, and limitations of endometriosis surgery in the management of infertility. In contrast to RRM's assertions, no evidence supports the adoption of endometriosis surgery as a replacement for IVF or as a primary treatment for infertility. Rather, the role of surgery in fertility care is highly nuanced and depends on each patient's clinical presentation, reproductive goals, and personal priorities.
Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory disease that drives pain, organ dysfunction, and infertility. How RRM-trained clinicians diagnose and treat it through excision surgery, cycle charting, and longitudinal care.
RRM live-birth rates across 14 peer-reviewed cohorts, 11 countries, 2008-2026. Crude and adjusted-cumulative outcomes with follow-up windows, by condition and age group.