Chapter 17: Achieving-Related Pregnancy Rate and Its Natural Adaptability
RRM Methods > NaProTECHNOLOGY > Clinical OutcomesRRM Methods > NaProTECHNOLOGY > EffectivenessRRM Methods > General FABM > Clinical Outcomes
False risk attribution results in misleading assessment of the relationship between suppression of ovulation and the effectiveness of the Yuzpe regimen for emergency contraception
Contraception, 67(4), 333-5; author reply 335-7
Abstract
No abstract available for this article.
Topics
Cite this article
Mikolajczyk, R. T., & Stanford, J. B. (2003). False risk attribution results in misleading assessment of the relationship between suppression of ovulation and the effectiveness of the Yuzpe regimen for emergency contraception. *Contraception*, *67*(4), 333-5; author reply 335-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-7824(02)00479-1
Mikolajczyk RT, Stanford JB. False risk attribution results in misleading assessment of the relationship between suppression of ovulation and the effectiveness of the Yuzpe regimen for emergency contraception. Contraception. 2003;67(4):333-5; author reply 335-7. doi:10.1016/s0010-7824(02)00479-1
Mikolajczyk, R. T., and J. B. Stanford. "False risk attribution results in misleading assessment of the relationship between suppression of ovulation and the effectiveness of the Yuzpe regimen for emergency contraception." *Contraception*, vol. 67, no. 4, 2003, pp. 333-5; author reply 335-7.