Contraception, 67(4), 333-5; author reply 335-7, 2003

False risk attribution results in misleading assessment of the relationship between suppression of ovulation and the effectiveness of the Yuzpe regimen for emergency contraception

Rafael Mikolajczyk , Joseph B Stanford

Author affiliations (2)

Critical to restorative reproductive medicine

DOI10.1016/s0010-7824(02)00479-1 PMID12684157
Read at publisher

Abstract not indexed. Read at publisher

Topics

Yuzpe regimen emergency contraception mechanism, ovulation suppression emergency contraception effectiveness, Mikolajczyk Stanford risk attribution emergency contraception, false risk attribution contraceptive efficacy, post-fertilization effects Yuzpe method, emergency contraception mechanism of action debate, hormonal emergency contraception ovulation inhibition, Yuzpe regimen implantation prevention, statistical modeling contraceptive effectiveness, risk attribution bias contraception research
PMID 12684157 12684157 DOI 10.1016/s0010-7824(02)00479-1 10.1016/s0010-7824(02)00479-1

Cite this article

Mikolajczyk, R. T., & Stanford, J. B. (2003). False risk attribution results in misleading assessment of the relationship between suppression of ovulation and the effectiveness of the Yuzpe regimen for emergency contraception. *Contraception*, *67*(4), 333-5; author reply 335-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-7824(02)00479-1

Related articles