Therapeutics · Prescribing Safety
Kimber-Trojnar Ż, Marciniak B, Patro-Malysza J, Skorzynska-Dziduszko K, Poniedzialek-Czajkowska E, Mierzynski R, Galczynski K, Trojnar M, Leszczynska-Gorzelak B, Oleszczuk J
Cite this paper
For EndNote, Zotero or Mendeley:
License
No open license is recorded for this paper. Reuse terms are set by the publisher.
Author affiliations
2 institutions
016f61126 Linked to ROR, the Research Organization Registry
The clinical recognition and adequate treatment of women with hyperglycemia during pregnancy is significant in order to reduce neonatal complications correlated with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). The traditional management of pregnant patients with GDM in whom diet restriction is not sufficient enough involves subcutaneous insulin administration. However, insulin therapy has several disadvantages. It is therefore highly desirable to find an effective alternative to insulin. Glyburide (also known as glibenclamide) is currently classified as Category C by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in pregnancy. Despite the fact that the FDA does not approve glyburide for the treatment of GDM, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommended in 2013 that: "when pharmacologic treatment of GDM is indicated, insulin and oral medications are equivalent in efficacy, and either can be an appropriate first-line therapy". These conflicting standpoints result from published contradictory data concerning the risks and benefits of the use of glyburide for the treatment of women with GDM. In this focused review we first present the current state of knowledge about the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of glyburide, including aspects of the transplacental transport and placental metabolism of the drug, and then we comment on several clinical studies describing the use of glyburide for the treatment of women with GDM. Since the contradictory data primarily concern the transfer of glyburide across the placenta, further rigorous scientific researches focusing on this issue are required in order to develop evidence-based recommendations for the use of glyburide for the treatment of women with GDM.
Olcha P et al., 2026 · Spectrochimica acta. Part A, Molecular and biomolecular spectroscopy
This study evaluated the diagnostic potential of Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy combined with machine learning for the detection of ovarian, bowel, and peritoneal endometriosis. The Boruta algorithm was applied to identify the most informative spectral intervals for each endometriosis type, revealing characteristic wave number ranges associated with molecular changes in endometriotic tissue. For ovarian endometriosis, key intervals included 741-748 cm-1, 984-993 cm-1, and 1125-1132 cm-1 bowel endometriosis, 1055-1063 cm-1, 1077-1079 cm-1, 1561-1572 cm-1, and 1717-1720 cm-1, and for peritoneal endometriosis, 917-919 cm-1, 1542-1547 cm-1, and 1573-1576 cm-1. Three machine learning algorithms, Deep Learning (DL), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and XGBoost, were tested using both the full spectral range and the Boruta-selected feature subsets. Across all endometriosis types, XGBoost consistently outperformed DL and SVM. Using the full spectrum, XGBoost achieved accuracies of 0.81, 0.77, and 0.78 for ovarian, bowel, and peritoneal endometriosis, respectively. Feature selection with Boruta significantly improved performance, increasing accuracies to 0.93, 0.88, and 0.90, respectively, and enhancing sensitivity, specificity, precision, F1 score, MCC, and ROC AUC across all datasets. DL models often exhibited high sensitivity but poor specificity, while SVM performance improved moderately with feature selection. Overall, these results demonstrate that targeted spectral feature selection enhances the diagnostic accuracy of machine learning models for endometriosis. XGBoost, in combination with Boruta-selected spectral intervals, provides the most reliable and balanced predictions, highlighting its potential for non-invasive detection and differentiation of ovarian, bowel, and peritoneal endometriotic lesions.
Nowakowski Ł et al., 2023 · Menopause (New York, N.Y.)
Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) occurs predominantly in postmenopausal women. Restoration of the proper estrogenization of vaginal mucosa is important in preoperative and postoperative treatment, increasing the effectiveness of this approach. The objective of this study was the development of intravaginal vaginal suppositories containing DHEA and comparison of the clinical effects of vaginal topical therapy with DHEA, estradiol, or antibiotic after POP surgery. Nine types of vaginal suppositories containing 6.5 mg DHEA in different bases were prepared to find optimal formulation for the vaginal conditions. Ninety women referred for POP surgery were randomly assigned to one of three groups receiving topical treatment in the postoperative period (estradiol, DHEA, or antibiotic). On admission to hospital and during follow-up vaginal pH, vaginal maturation index and vaginal symptoms were assessed. Vaginal suppositories with the base made from polyethylene glycol 1,000 without surfactants characterized the highest percentage of the released DHEA. In women treated with topical estradiol or DHEA a significant decrease in the number of parabasal cells, increase in superficial and intermediate cells in the vaginal smears, decrease in vaginal pH, and reduction of vaginal symptoms were observed. The use of topical therapy with DHEA or the use of topical therapy with estradiol in the postoperative period were both shown to improve maturation index, vaginal pH, and vaginal symptoms. The benefits of topical therapy with DHEA after pelvic organ prolapse repair brings similar results as estradiol, without potential systemic exposure to increased concentrations of sex steroids above levels observed in postmenopausal women.
Stanford JB et al., 2022 · Hum Reprod Open · Free full text on PubMed Central
What is the feasibility of a prospective protocol to follow subfertile couples being treated with natural procreative technology for up to 3 years at multiple clinical sites? Overall, clinical sites had missing data for about one-third of participants, the proportion of participants responding to follow-up questionnaires during time periods when participant compensation was available (about two-thirds) was double that of time periods when participant compensation was not available (about one-third) and follow-up information was most complete for pregnancies and births (obtained from both clinics and participants). Several retrospective single-clinic studies from Canada, Ireland and the USA, with subfertile couples receiving restorative reproductive medicine, mostly natural procreative technology, have reported adjusted cumulative live birth rates ranging from 29% to 66%, for treatment for up to 2 years, with a mean women's age of about 35 years. The international Natural Procreative Technology Evaluation and Surveillance of Treatment for Subfertility (iNEST) was designed as a multicenter, prospective cohort study, to enroll subfertile couples seeking treatment for live birth, assess baseline characteristics and follow them up for up to 3 years to report diagnoses, treatments and outcomes of pregnancy and live birth. In addition to obtaining data from medical record abstraction, we sent follow-up questionnaires to participants (both women and men) to obtain information about treatments and pregnancy outcomes, including whether they obtained treatment elsewhere. The study was conducted from 2006 to 2016, with a total of 10 clinics participating for at least some of the study period across four countries (Canada, Poland, UK and USA). The 834 participants were subfertile couples with the woman's age 18 years or more, not pregnant and seeking a live birth, with at least one clinic visit. Couples with known absolute infertility were excluded (i.e. bilateral tubal blockage, azoospermia). Most women were trained to use a standardized protocol for daily vulvar observation, description and recording of cervical mucus and vaginal bleeding (the Creighton Model FertilityCare System). Couples received medical and sometimes surgical evaluation and treatments aimed to restore and optimize female and male reproductive function, to facilitate in vivo conception. MAIN The mean age of women starting treatment was 34.0 years; among those with additional demographic data, 382/478 (80%) had 16 or more years of education, and 199/659 (30%) had a prior live birth. Across 10 clinical sites in four countries (mostly private clinical practices) with family physicians or obstetrician-gynecologists, data about clinic visits were submitted for 60% of participants, and diagnostic data for 77%. For data obtained directly from the couple, 59% of couples had at least one follow-up questionnaire, and the proportion of women and men responding to fill out the follow-up questionnaires was 69% and 67%, respectively, when participant financial compensation was available, compared to 38% and 33% when compensation was not available. Among all couples, 57% had at least one pregnancy and 44% at least one live birth during the follow-up time period, based on data obtained from clinic and/or participant questionnaires. All sites reported on female pelvic surgical procedures, and among all participants, 22% of females underwent a pelvic diagnostic and/or therapeutic procedure, predominantly laparoscopy and hysterosalpingography. Among the 643 (77%) of participants with diagnostic information, ovulation-related disorders were diagnosed in 87%, endometriosis in 31%, nutritional disorders in 47% and abnormalities of semen analysis in 24%. The mean number of diagnoses per couple was 4.7. LIMITATIONS The level of missing data was higher than anticipated, which limits both generalizability and the ability to study different components of treatment and prognosis. Loss to follow-up may also be differential and introduce bias for outcomes. Most of the participating clinicians were not surgeons, which limits the opportunity to study the impact of surgical interventions. Participants were geographically dispersed but relatively homogeneous with regard to socioeconomic status, which may limit the generalizability of current and future findings. Multicenter studies are key to understanding the outcomes of subfertility treatments beyond IVF or IUI in broader populations, and the association of different prognostic factors with outcomes. We anticipate that the iNEST study will provide insight for clinical and treatment factors associated with outcomes of pregnancy and live birth, with appropriate attention to potential biases (including adjustment for potential confounders, multiple imputation for missing data, sensitivity analysis and inverse probability weighting for potential differential loss to follow-up, and assessments for clinical site heterogeneity). Future studies will need to either have: adequate funding to compensate clinics and participants for robust data collection, including targeted randomized trials; or a scaled-down, registry-based approach with targeted data points, similar to the multiple national and regional ART registries. Funding for the study came from the International Institute for Restorative Reproductive Medicine, the University of Utah, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, Health Studies Fund, the Primary Children's Medical Foundation, the Mary Cross Tippmann Foundation, the Atlas Foundation, the St. Augustine Foundation and the Women's Reproductive Health Foundation. The authors declare no competing interests. The iNEST study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01363596.
Gałczyński K et al., 2021 · Journal of clinical medicine · Free full text on PubMed Central
Although in developed countries endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecological malignancy, its occurrence in adolescents is exceedingly rare. The increasing rate of obesity in children and adolescents is held responsible for the increasing prevalence of EC in younger cohorts of patients. The diagnosis of this malignancy can have devastating consequences for future fertility because standard treatment protocols for EC include hysterectomy. Here, we present the first detailed review of the world literature on EC in subjects aged 21 years or younger (n = 19). The mean age at diagnosis was 16.7 ± 0.6 years. One patient (5.3%) had a Type II (high-risk) disease. No communication retrieved from the search reported on patient death; however, two (10.5%) patients were lost to follow-up. There was also a high proportion (five subjects, or 26.3%) of cases with genetic background (Cowden syndrome and Turner syndrome), therefore genetic screening or a direct genetic study should be considered in very young patients with EC. The current fertility-sparing options, limited to Type I (low-risk) disease, are presented and discussed. Such information, obtained from studies on older women, translates well to adolescent girls and very young women. Careful anatomopathological monitoring at follow-up is essential for the safety of a conservative approach. Improved survival in very young EC patients makes the preservation of fertility a central survivorship issue, therefore both patients and caregivers should undergo counseling regarding available options. Moreover, our study suggests that genetic syndromes other than Lynch syndrome may be associated with EC more frequently than previously thought.
Glueck CJ et al., 2002 · Fertil Steril
To assess whether metformin safely reduced development of gestational diabetes in women with the polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Prospective and retrospective study. Outpatient clinical research center. PATIENT(S): The prospective study included 33 nondiabetic women with PCOS who conceived while taking metformin and had live births; of these, 28 were taking metformin through delivery. The retrospective study included 39 nondiabetic women with PCOS who had live birth pregnancies without metformin therapy. INTERVENTION(S): Metformin, 2.55 g/d, throughout pregnancy in women with PCOS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Development of gestational diabetes in women with PCOS. RESULT(S): Before metformin therapy, after covariance adjustment for age, the two cohorts did not differ in height, weight, basal metabolic index, insulin, insulin resistance, or insulin secretion. Both cohorts had high fasting insulin, were insulin resistant, and had high insulin secretion. Among the 33 women who received metformin, gestational diabetes developed in 1 of 33 (3%) pregnancies versus 8 of 12 (67%) of their previous pregnancies without metformin. Among the 39 women who did not take metformin, gestational diabetes developed in 14 of 60 (23%) pregnancies. When all live births were combined, gestational diabetes occurred in 22 of 72 pregnancies (31%) in women who did not take metformin versus 1 of 33 pregnancies (3%) in those who took metformin. With gestational diabetes as the response variable and age at delivery and treatment group (metformin or no metformin) as explanatory variables, the odds ratio for gestational diabetes in women with metformin versus without metformin was 0.093 (95% CI: 0.011 to 0.795). With gestational diabetes in 93 pregnancies as the response variable and age at delivery and treatment group (metformin no metformin) as explanatory variables, the odds ratio of gestational diabetes in pregnancies in women taking metformin versus without metformin was 0.115 (95% CI: 0.014 to 0.938). CONCLUSION(S): In PCOS, use of metformin is associated with a 10-fold reduction in gestational diabetes (31% to 3%). It also reduces insulin resistance and insulin secretion, thus decreasing the secretory demands imposed on pancreatic beta-cells by insulin resistance and pregnancy.
Glueck CJ et al., 2001 · Fertil Steril
To determine whether metformin would safely reduce the rate of first-trimester spontaneous abortion without teratogenicity in 19 women with the polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Prospective pilot study. Outpatient. PATIENT(S): Twenty-two previously oligoamenorrheic, nondiabetic women with PCOS; 125 women with PCOS who were not currently pregnant and who had > or = 1 previous pregnancy while they were not receiving metformin. INTERVENTION(S): Metformin, 1.5-2.55 g/day, throughout pregnancy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Rates of first-trimester spontaneous abortion and teratogenicity. RESULT(S): Before metformin, 10 women had 22 previous pregnancies with 16 first-trimester spontaneous abortions (73%). While receiving metformin, these 10 women had 6 normal live births (60%), 1 spontaneous abortion (10%), and 3 normal ongoing pregnancies (30%) (all > or = 13 weeks; median gestation, 23 weeks). Among women receiving metformin, including those with live births and normal pregnancy for at least the first trimester, 1 of 10 (10%) had first-trimester spontaneous abortion compared with 73% in 22 previous pregnancies without metformin (P<.002). To date, the 19 women receiving metformin have had no adverse maternal side effects, and no birth defects have occurred; 9 (47%) had normal term live births, 2 (11%) had normal and appropriate for gestational age births (one at 33 and one at 35 weeks), 6 (32%) have ongoing normal pregnancies lasting longer than the first trimester, and 2 (10.5%) had first-trimester spontaneous abortions. Sonography showed normal fetal development without congenital defects in the 6 ongoing pregnancies (median gestation, 23 weeks). Among women who received metformin before conception, reductions in insulin and plasminogen activator inhibitor activity were correlated (r=0.65, P=.04). CONCLUSION(S): Metformin therapy throughout pregnancy in women with PCOS reduces the otherwise high rate of first-trimester spontaneous abortion seen among women not receiving metformin and does not appear to be teratogenic.
Vounzoulaki E et al., 2020 · BMJ · Free full text on PubMed Central
To estimate and compare progression rates to type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and healthy controls. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Medline and Embase between January 2000 and December 2019, studies published in English and conducted on humans. ELIGIBILITY Observational studies investigating progression to T2DM. Inclusion criteria were postpartum follow-up for at least 12 months, incident physician based diagnosis of diabetes, T2DM reported as a separate outcome rather than combined with impaired fasting glucose or impaired glucose tolerance, and studies with both a group of patients with GDM and a control group. This meta-analysis of 20 studies assessed a total of 1 332 373 individuals (67 956 women with GDM and 1 264 417 controls). Data were pooled by random effects meta-analysis models, and heterogeneity was assessed by use of the I2 statistic. The pooled relative risk for the incidence of T2DM between participants with GDM and controls was estimated. Reasons for heterogeneity between studies were investigated by prespecified subgroup and meta-regression analyses. Publication bias was assessed by funnel plots and, overall, studies were deemed to have a low risk of bias (P=0.58 and P=0.90). The overall relative risk for T2DM was almost 10 times higher in women with previous GDM than in healthy controls (9.51, 95% confidence interval 7.14 to 12.67, P<0.001). In populations of women with previous GDM, the cumulative incidence of T2DM was 16.46% (95% confidence interval 16.16% to 16.77%) in women of mixed ethnicity, 15.58% (13.30% to 17.86%) in a predominantly non-white population, and 9.91% (9.39% to 10.42%) in a white population. These differences were not statistically significant between subgroups (white v mixed populations, P=0.26; white v non-white populations, P=0.54). Meta-regression analyses showed that the study effect size was not significantly associated with mean study age, body mass index, publication year, and length of follow-up. Women with a history of GDM appear to have a nearly 10-fold higher risk of developing T2DM than those with a normoglycaemic pregnancy. The magnitude of this risk highlights the importance of intervening to prevent the onset of T2DM, particularly in the early years after pregnancy. PROSPERO CRD42019123079.