General Gynecology · Cancer and Fertility

Fertility-Sparing Methods in Adolescents Affected by Endometrial Cancer: A Comprehensive Review

Gałczyński K, Olcha P, Romanek-Piva K, Jóźwik M, Semczuk A

Published March 2, 2021 Journal of clinical medicine
DOI 10.3390/jcm10051020 PMID 33801452 PMC PMC7958602
Read our synopsis

RRM Academy Synopsis

Fertility-sparing care exists for low-risk teen endometrial cancer

A review of 19 published cases of endometrial cancer in people aged 21 or younger found 1 (5.3%) had metastatic Type II (high-risk) disease. The paper's fertility-sparing criteria require Grade 1 cancer, which 12 of the 19 had. Five had a genetic syndrome. Apart from one series, the reports describe single cases.

Key Findings

  • A literature search through December 2020 found 15 studies covering 19 cases of endometrial cancer in people aged 21 or younger. Patients averaged 16.7 ± 0.6 years old at diagnosis.
  • Abnormal genital bleeding was present in 17 (89.5%) patients. Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS, now called PMOS) was diagnosed in 7 (36.8%) and increased body weight in 6 (31.6%).
  • Grade 1 cancer was diagnosed in 12 (63.2%) patients and Grade 2 in 5 (26.3%). One (5.3%) patient, aged 17, had metastatic Type II disease.
  • Cowden syndrome occurred in 3 (15.8%) cases and Turner syndrome in 2 (10.5%). No retrieved report described a death. Follow-up was lost for 2 (10.5%) patients.
  • Fertility-sparing treatment was attempted in 11 (57.9%) patients: oral progestin in 9 (81.8%) and a levonorgestrel intrauterine device in 2 (18.2%).

Interpretation

The authors pooled published case reports and one small series, found through a MEDLINE search plus hand searching. Cases may be missing, and the authors advise caution with the conclusions. Treatment details varied widely between cases. Criteria for fertility-sparing care come from expert consensus opinion and review papers. The authors state that findings from older women carry over well to teenagers and very young women.

RRM Context

The paper names prolonged unopposed estrogen as a central driver of endometrial cancer. It lists obesity, missing ovulation and PCOS among risk factors in young patients. Abnormal bleeding was the usual first sign. Restorative reproductive medicine treats abnormal bleeding in an adolescent as a sign that calls for a diagnosis, and cycle charting records her ovulatory pattern.

Abstract

Although in developed countries endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecological malignancy, its occurrence in adolescents is exceedingly rare. The increasing rate of obesity in children and adolescents is held responsible for the increasing prevalence of EC in younger cohorts of patients. The diagnosis of this malignancy can have devastating consequences for future fertility because standard treatment protocols for EC include hysterectomy. Here, we present the first detailed review of the world literature on EC in subjects aged 21 years or younger (n = 19). The mean age at diagnosis was 16.7 ± 0.6 years. One patient (5.3%) had a Type II (high-risk) disease. No communication retrieved from the search reported on patient death; however, two (10.5%) patients were lost to follow-up. There was also a high proportion (five subjects, or 26.3%) of cases with genetic background (Cowden syndrome and Turner syndrome), therefore genetic screening or a direct genetic study should be considered in very young patients with EC. The current fertility-sparing options, limited to Type I (low-risk) disease, are presented and discussed. Such information, obtained from studies on older women, translates well to adolescent girls and very young women. Careful anatomopathological monitoring at follow-up is essential for the safety of a conservative approach. Improved survival in very young EC patients makes the preservation of fertility a central survivorship issue, therefore both patients and caregivers should undergo counseling regarding available options. Moreover, our study suggests that genetic syndromes other than Lynch syndrome may be associated with EC more frequently than previously thought.

Topics

By this author

Related research

General Gynecology › Cancer and Fertility › Fertility Preservation Before Treatment
Krzysztof Galczynski, Piotr Olcha, Katarzyna Romanek-Piva, Maciej Jóźwik, Andrzej Semczuk
K Galczynski, P Olcha, K Romanek-Piva, M Jóźwik, A Semczuk
PMID 33801452 33801452 DOI 10.3390/jcm10051020 10.3390/jcm10051020 Gałczyński et al. 2021, Gałczyński 2021