To assess feasibility, and collect preliminary data for a subsequent randomized, sham-controlled trial to evaluate Japanese-style acupuncture for reducing chronic pelvic pain and improving health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in adolescents with endometriosis.
Design
Randomized, sham-controlled trial.
SETTINGS: Tertiary-referral hospital.
Participants
Eighteen young women (13-22y) with laparoscopically-diagnosed endometriosis-related chronic pelvic pain.
Interventions
A Japanese style of acupuncture and a sham acupuncture control. Sixteen treatments were administered over 8 weeks.
Main Outcome Measures
Protocol feasibility, recruitment numbers, pain not associated with menses or intercourse, and multiple HRQOL instruments including Endometriosis Health Profile, Pediatric Quality of Life, Perceived Stress, and Activity Limitation.
Results
Fourteen participants (out of 18 randomized) completed the study per protocol. Participants in the active acupuncture group (n = 9) experienced an average 4.8 (SD = 2.4) point reduction on a 11 point scale (62%) in pain after 4 weeks, which differed significantly from the control group's (n = 5) average reduction of 1.4 (SD = 2.1) points (P = 0.004). Reduction in pain in the active group persisted through a 6-month assessment; however, after 4 weeks, differences between the active and control group decreased and were not statistically significant. All HRQOL measures indicated greater improvements in the active acupuncture group compared to the control; however, the majority of these trends were not statistically significant. No serious adverse events were reported.
Conclusion
Preliminary estimates indicate that Japanese-style acupuncture may be an effective, safe, and well-tolerated adjunct therapy for endometriosis-related pelvic pain in adolescents. A more definitive trial evaluating Japanese-style acupuncture in this population is both feasible and warranted.
PMID 18794019 18794019 DOI 10.1016/j.jpag.2007.07.008 10.1016/j.jpag.2007.07.008 Wayne et al. 2008, Wayne 2008
Cite this article
Wayne, P. M., Kerr, C. E., Schnyer, R. N., Legedza, A. T., Savetsky-German, J., Shields, M. H., Buring, J. E., Davis, R. B., Conboy, L. A., Highfield, E., Parton, B., Thomas, P., & Laufer, M. R. (2008). Japanese-style acupuncture for endometriosis-related pelvic pain in adolescents and young women: results of a randomized sham-controlled trial. Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology, 21(5), 247-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2007.07.008
Wayne PM, Kerr CE, Schnyer RN, Legedza AT, Savetsky-German J, Shields MH, Buring JE, Davis RB, Conboy LA, Highfield E, Parton B, Thomas P, Laufer MR. Japanese-style acupuncture for endometriosis-related pelvic pain in adolescents and young women: results of a randomized sham-controlled trial. Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology. 2008;21(5):247-57. doi:10.1016/j.jpag.2007.07.008
Balık G et al., 2014·Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
Menstrual problems are common among adolescent females. Mood changes are related to menstrual problems (menorrhagia, dysmenorrhea, and abnormal menstrual cycle length). The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between depressive symptoms, anxiety, and premenstrual syndrome (PMS) with dysmenorrhea in adolescent girls. A total of 159 adolescent girls (aged 13-19 y) with regular menstrual cycles presenting to the gynecology clinic with any complaints were included in the study during April-May 2013. All of the participants filled up the sociodemographic data collection form, FACES Pain Rating Scale, Beck anxiety inventory (BAI), Beck depression inventory (BDI), and a questionnaire form on criteria for PMS. Mann-Whitney U and chi-square tests were used to analyze the data. The prevalence of dysmenorrhea was 67.9%. The mean BAI and BDI scores of the patients were 13.64 ± 12.81 and 11.88 ± 10.83, respectively. Statistically significant differences were observed between patients and control groups on the BAI and BDI scoring (P < .05). At least 1 of the symptoms of the PMS was detected in all of the participants and 29 (18.2%) of them were diagnosed as premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD). The mean BAI score of the patients with PMS and PMDD were 9.65 ± 9.28 and 21.31 ± 15.75, respectively. The mean BDI score of the patients with PMS and PMDD were 8.39 ± 8.62 and 19.1 ± 11.85, respectively. Statistically significant differences were observed between PMS/PMDD and BAI/BDI scoring (P = .00). Adolescent girls with dysmenorrhea have an increased risk of depression and anxiety. These results of our study are significant in emphasizing the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to primary dysmenorrhea follow-up and treatment.
De Cicco Nardone C et al., 2026·Archives of gynecology and obstetrics
Adenomyosis is a chronic uterine disorder characterised by ectopic endometrial tissue within the myometrium, frequently associated with dysmenorrhea, abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB), chronic pelvic pain (CPP), and dyspareunia. No standardised guidelines are currently available for its management, and therapeutic options remain limited for women seeking fertility preservation. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of intravaginal progesterone in alleviating adenomyosis-related symptoms in patients seeking fertility preservation. In this prospective monocentric observational study, 85 patients aged 22-50 years with ultrasound-confirmed symptomatic adenomyosis were enrolled between April 2020 and April 2024. Inclusion criteria were age 18-55 years, BMI 18-35, and a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score ≥ 7 for dysmenorrhea, AUB, CPP, or dyspareunia. All patients received 200 mg/day of intravaginal progesterone for 10 days per cycle. Symptom severity was assessed using VAS scores at baseline and at 6 months. Data were analysed using non-parametric statistical tests. Sixty-five patients completed the 6-month follow-up. Four patients conceived during treatment and were excluded from the final analysis. Statistically significant improvements were observed for all assessed symptoms (all p < 0.05). Median VAS scores decreased for dysmenorrhea (9 to 6, p < 0.001), AUB (8 to 6, p < 0.001), chronic pelvic pain (5.5 to 3.5, p < 0.001), and dyspareunia (2 to 0, p = 0.020). The overall treatment satisfaction was high, with a mean Likert score of 7.5 out of 10. Intravaginal progesterone appears to be an effective fertility-sparing treatment for symptomatic adenomyosis, providing significant relief across all primary symptoms, with high patient satisfaction. Larger controlled studies are warranted to confirm these preliminary findings and further define its role in clinical practice.
Does IVF worsen pelvic pain in women with endometriosis? Nearly half of women with endometriosis reported perceived worsening of pelvic pain after IVF. Prior studies generally suggested no IVF-related pain worsening, but few assessed delayed flares or longer-term trajectories. International cross-sectional study based on an online survey conducted between September 2024 and April 2025 including 546 respondents. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS Women aged ≥18 years with surgically or imaging-confirmed endometriosis and at least one completed IVF cycle. A 25-item questionnaire captured demographics, reproductive history, comorbidities, and patient-reported pain trajectories before, during, and after IVF. The primary outcome was perceived worsening of pelvic pain after IVF (patient-reported outcome measure; PROM). Secondary outcomes were worsening of dysmenorrhoea and dyspareunia. Group comparisons and exploratory multivariable logistic regressions were performed. Predictor analyses were exploratory. MAIN Among 546 respondents, 48.9% reported worsening pelvic pain after IVF, 49.1% reported worsening dysmenorrhoea, and 35.5% worsening dyspareunia. Current pain scores were significantly higher in women reporting worsening versus no worsening (all P < 0.001). In multivariable analyses, immediate post-cycle pain flare emerged as the strongest and most consistent predictor across all pain outcomes, independently associated with worsening of pelvic pain (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 5.91, 95% CI 3.88-9.14), dysmenorrhoea (aOR 4.03, 95% CI 2.08-8.05), and dyspareunia (aOR 3.17, 95% CI 2.07-4.90) (all P < 0.001). For the primary outcome, reporting oocyte retrieval as the most painful IVF step (aOR 0.53, 95% CI 0.31-0.88; P = 0.016) and achieving a live birth after IVF (aOR 0.63, 95% CI 0.42-0.92; P = 0.020) were independently associated with lower odds of pelvic pain worsening. In secondary outcome models, live birth was associated with lower odds of dysmenorrhoea worsening, while bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis independently predicted worsening of dyspareunia. A formal response rate could not be calculated due to open online dissemination without a known denominator. LIMITATIONS Self-reported, retrospective data are prone to recall and selection bias, and the cross-sectional design precludes causal inference. Recruitment via associations and social media without a denominator limits generalizability, absence of baseline pain scores impedes assessment of change, and incomplete capture of peri-IVF hormonal regimens may confound results. IVF may not be pain-neutral in endometriosis. Monitoring pain trajectories at key IVF milestones may help identify women at risk of long-term exacerbation. Prospective studies should test whether early monitoring combined with tailored interventions-optimized analgesia, psychological support, or adapted stimulation protocols-can mitigate chronic pain trajectories throughout the IVF journey and ultimately improve quality of life. No specific funding; authors declare no conflicts of interest. N/A.
For many patients with endometriosis, laparoscopic surgery is the most effective treatment to alleviate severe chronic pelvic pain and improve quality of life. Because endometriosis is common among individuals with infertility, surgery is often considered alongside fertility evaluation and treatment to manage symptoms, identify disease pathology, and restore pelvic anatomy. In patients who desire pregnancy, the decision of whether and when to pursue surgery should be guided by clear medical indications and shared decision making between the patient and their obstetrician-gynecologist. In recent months, however, religious and political groups have sought to reframe this medical decision as an ideologic and moral one, advocating for endometriosis surgery in nearly all patients with infertility and claiming that this can eliminate the need for assisted reproductive technologies. This framework, known as restorative reproductive medicine (RRM), aligns with efforts to promote the "personhood" of fertilized eggs, restrict access to in in vitro fertilization (IVF), and advance endometriosis surgery and lifestyle modifications as "root-cause treatment leading to natural fertility." Recent editorials and issue briefs in the obstetrics and gynecology literature have discussed the serious ethical, medical, and policy implications of RRM, yet there remains an urgent need to address specifically the unfounded claims about endometriosis surgery and its purported advantages over assisted reproductive technology. This article examines the social context of this controversy and reviews the current evidence regarding the indications, benefits, and limitations of endometriosis surgery in the management of infertility. In contrast to RRM's assertions, no evidence supports the adoption of endometriosis surgery as a replacement for IVF or as a primary treatment for infertility. Rather, the role of surgery in fertility care is highly nuanced and depends on each patient's clinical presentation, reproductive goals, and personal priorities.