Gompel, A., Seifert-Klauss, V., Simon, J. A., & Prior, J. C. (2023). Lack of evidence that progesterone in ovulatory cycles causes breast cancer. Climacteric : the journal of the International Menopause Society, 26(6), 634-637. https://doi.org/10.1080/13697137.2023.2249813
Gompel A, Seifert-Klauss V, Simon JA, Prior JC. Lack of evidence that progesterone in ovulatory cycles causes breast cancer. Climacteric. 2023;26(6):634-637. doi:10.1080/13697137.2023.2249813
Gompel, A., et al. "Lack of evidence that progesterone in ovulatory cycles causes breast cancer." Climacteric : the journal of the International Menopause Society, vol. 26, no. 6, 2023, pp. 634-637.
For EndNote, Zotero or Mendeley:
License
No open license is recorded for this paper. Reuse terms are set by the publisher.
Vancouver Hospital and Health Sciences Centre05p83my93
Linked to ROR, the Research Organization Registry
Abstract
A recent Perspective article asserted that progesterone secretion during ovulatory cycles is the cause of breast cancer. However, we challenge most of the evidence developed in this publication. First, there is a lack of evidence that progesterone is mutagenic for breast cells. Cause of a cancer should mean initiation by mutation, as opposed to promotion. Second, subclinical ovulatory disturbances occur rather frequently in normal-length menstrual cycles. Third, the authors attribute a potential carcinogenic effect to progesterone secreted during menstrual cycles but not to progesterone during pregnancy. They did not discuss breast cancer evidence from progesterone/progestin therapeutics. They argue that in genetic primary amenorrhea, a hypothetic lower risk of breast cancer could be due to the lack of progesterone, despite the progesterone/progestin in hormone replacements these women receive. Fourth, they advocate a regulatory effect of progesterone on several genes potentially involved in cancer genesis. In particular, they attribute a lower risk of breast cancer in women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome to a defect in the progesterone-stimulated Wnt4 gene. However, this defect is only present in a small subset. Thus, the postulated progesterone breast cancer risk is unconvincing, which we discuss point by point in this commentary.
Guthardt Y et al., 2026·Sci Rep·Free full text on PubMed Central
This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the relationship between menstrual cycle phases and the incidence of muscle injuries in female team sport athletes, following PRISMA 2020 and PERSiST guidelines. A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and SPORTDiscus from inception to mid-January 2024. Studies were included if they examined female team sport athletes of reproductive age with regular menstrual cycles and compared the occurrence of muscle injuries across at least two menstrual phases. Studies involving hormonal contraceptive use, medications affecting the menstrual cycle or musculoskeletal system, or menstrual dysfunction were excluded. Three studies met the inclusion criteria, involving 318 participants. Meta-analysis yielded a pooled Risk Ratio of 1.18 (95% CI: 0.75 to 1.86, p = 0.46) for injury risk between the luteal and follicular phases, suggesting no statistically significant association. However, the certainty of the cumulative evidence was rated as very low due to methodological limitations, including inconsistent phase classifications and reliance on imprecise methods for identifying menstrual phases. Consequently, no practical or clinical recommendations can be made at this time. Future research employing standardised, physiologically accurate methods for classifying and detecting menstrual cycle phases is necessary to better understand the potential links between hormonal fluctuations and injury risk.
In order to investigate the nature of the association of involuntarily delayed first birth and risk of breast cancer, 1083 white women who had been evaluated and treated for infertility from 1945-1965 were followed prospectively through April 1978 to ascertain their breast cancer incidence. These women were categorized as to the cause of infertility into two groups, those with endogenous progesterone deficiency (PD) and those with nonhormonal causes (NH). Women in the PD group had 5.4 times the risk of premenopausal breast cancer compared to women in the NH group. This excess risk could not be explained by differences between the two groups in ages at menarche or menopause, history of oral contraceptive use, history of benign breast disease or age at first birth. Women in the PD group also experienced a 10-fold increase in deaths from all malignant neoplasms compared to the NH group. The incidence of postmenopausal breast cancer did not differ significantly between the two groups.
Olsson HL et al., 2020·Frontiers in oncology·Free full text on PubMed Central
Cyclic hormonal stimulation of the breast tissue plays a significant role in breast carcinogenesis. Current risk factor models do not include direct measures of cycle characteristics although the effects of possible surrogates of cycle activity such as age at menarche and menopause, parity, and nursing time have been investigated. Future risk models should also include menstrual cycle length, regularity, number of cycles before first full-term pregnancy, and life-time number of cycles. New risk factor models for pre- and postmenopausal breast cancer are proposed here. Furthermore, there is a need for more long-term, prospective studies investigating menstrual cycle characteristics as data currently available are primarily retrospective and collected at one time-point only.
Blood and urine specimens from 27 premenopausal breast cancer patients and 62 healthy controls have been compared with respect to concentration of testosterone and progesterone in blood and of testosterone and androstanediol in urine, measured in the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. There was a strong positive association between the concentration of the two androgens, either in blood or urine, and breast cancer risk. A strong association was also observed with decreasing levels of progesterone. The association was statistically significant (p for trend less than 0.01) for each hormone; the rate ratios were 10.2 for serum testosterone (highest category), 5.6 for serum progesterone (lowest category), 8.4 for urinary testosterone (highest category), and 5.2 for androstanediol (highest category). The rate ratio for women presenting both high serum testosterone and low progesterone was 21.8 (4.1 to 116.1). Considering the exposure to at least one of three androgens at the highest level and low progesterone, the rate ratio was as high as 90.2 (8.2 to 989.7). This study provides evidence for the hypothesis that increased androgenic activity is an important risk indicator for breast cancer, particularly when associated with anovulation, as indicated by low serum progesterone level.
Serum testosterone, progesterone, luteinizing hormone, prolactin, and sex hormone-binding globulin levels were measured in 55 normal controls, in 31 patients with hyperplastic alterations of breast epithelium, and in 23 patients with breast cancer. All patients and controls were premenopausal, and they were comparable for age, weight, and body surface. In the controls, the mean level of testosterone [0.47 +/- 0.16 (S.D.) ng/ml] was lower and the mean level of progesterone (17.63 +/- 8.11 ng/ml) was higher than in breast cancer patients [testosterone level, 0.62 +/- 0.22 ng/ml (p less than 0.005); progesterone level, 11.4 +/- 8.0 ng/ml (p less than 0.005)] and in patients with breast epithelial hyperplasia [testosterone level, 0.55 +/- 0.2 ng/ml (p less than or equal to 0.05); progesterone level, 13.9 +/- 8.6 ng/ml (p less than 0.05)]. No difference was found in the mean circulating levels of luteinizing hormone, prolactin, or sex hormone-binding globulin between controls and patients. These results confirm previous findings of increased urinary testosterone excretion in women with anovulatory menstrual cycles and epithelial hyperplasia or cancer of the breast and strongly support the hypothesis that androgens play an important role in both induction and development of breast cancer.
General Gynecology › Breast Health › Breast Cancer Risk · Reproductive Endocrinology › Ovarian Hormones › Progesterone
Jerilynn C Prior
J Prior
PMID 37671636 37671636 DOI 10.1080/13697137.2023.2249813 10.1080/13697137.2023.2249813 Gompel et al. 2023, Gompel 2023
Cite this article
Gompel, A., Seifert-Klauss, V., Simon, J. A., & Prior, J. C. (2023). Lack of evidence that progesterone in ovulatory cycles causes breast cancer. Climacteric : the journal of the International Menopause Society, 26(6), 634-637. https://doi.org/10.1080/13697137.2023.2249813
Gompel A, Seifert-Klauss V, Simon JA, Prior JC. Lack of evidence that progesterone in ovulatory cycles causes breast cancer. Climacteric. 2023;26(6):634-637. doi:10.1080/13697137.2023.2249813
Gompel, A., et al. "Lack of evidence that progesterone in ovulatory cycles causes breast cancer." Climacteric : the journal of the International Menopause Society, vol. 26, no. 6, 2023, pp. 634-637.