To evaluate the involvement of endogenous opiates in the pathophysiology of the hyperinsulinism in patients affected by polycystic ovary disease by administering naloxone and naltrexone. We also studied the hormonal status following long-term opioid antagonist administration.
Methods
Twenty-one women affected by polycystic ovary disease participated in the study. An oral glucose tolerance test (GTT) was performed at baseline and repeated after short-term naloxone infusion and after 6 weeks of naltrexone administration. Plasma glucose and insulin levels were evaluated in all samples. Gonadotropins, sex hormone-binding globulin, and androgen levels were determined initially and after the naltrexone treatment.
Results
None of the patients showed any alteration of glucose tolerance. Based on the insulin response to the GTT, the patients were classified as normo- or hyperinsulinemic. Opioid antagonist administration significantly reduced the insulin response to the GTT in hyperinsulinemic patients, without affecting their glycemic levels. In normoinsulinemic patients, glucose plasma levels were increased whereas insulin levels were not modified by the treatments. Gonadotropin and androgen plasma concentrations were not modified after naltrexone administration.
Conclusions
This work supports a role for the endogenous opiates in the regulation of exaggerated insulin secretion in patients with polycystic ovary disease. The reduction of insulin secretion failed to demonstrate any hormonal modification in such hyperandrogenized patients.
Fulghesu, A. M., Lanzone, A., Cucinelli, F., Caruso, A., & Mancuso, S. (1993). Long-term naltrexone treatment reduces the exaggerated insulin secretion in patients with polycystic ovary disease. Obstetrics and gynecology, 82(2), 191-197.
Fulghesu AM, Lanzone A, Cucinelli F, Caruso A, Mancuso S. Long-term naltrexone treatment reduces the exaggerated insulin secretion in patients with polycystic ovary disease. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;82(2):191-197.
Fulghesu, A. M., et al. "Long-term naltrexone treatment reduces the exaggerated insulin secretion in patients with polycystic ovary disease." Obstetrics and gynecology, vol. 82, no. 2, 1993, pp. 191-197.
To investigate the involvement of opioid tone, obesity, and hyperinsulinemia in GH secretion in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Controlled clinical study. Catholic University of Sacred Heart School of Medicine in Rome, Italy. PATIENT(S): Twenty-two patients with PCOS and 14 healthy, normally ovulating volunteers, matched for age and body mass index. INTERVENTION(S): Patients underwent a GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) test and an oral glucose tolerance test before and after 4-5 weeks of treatment with 50 mg/d of naltrexone. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Serum concentrations of GH, insulin, glucose, steroids, and gonadotropins, as well as the GH area under the curve (AUC-GH) and the insulin area under the curve (AUC-I), were measured before and after naltrexone treatment. RESULT(S): In patients with PCOS, the administration of naltrexone increased the GH response to the GHRH test without interfering with the insulin response to the oral glucose tolerance test. However, the GH response to the GHRH test was improved significantly only in lean patients with PCOS, whereas obese patients with PCOS did not show any improvement in GH secretion. In obese control subjects, the treatment reduced plasma basal insulin concentrations and increased the AUC-GH, whereas in lean control subjects, the treatment reduced the GHRH-induced response. In normoinsulinemic patients with PCOS, the GH response to the GHRH test increased significantly after treatment, whereas the AUC-I was not affected. In hyperinsulinemic patients with PCOS, treatment with naltrexone significantly reduced the AUC-I, whereas the AUC-GH increased only in lean hyperinsulinemic patients with PCOS. CONCLUSION(S): Naltrexone treatment improves GHRH-induced GH secretion in patients with PCOS. However, this GH response is heterogeneously represented in relation to both obesity and hyperinsulinism.
PCOSInsulin Resistance ScreeningHyperinsulinemiaGlucose-Insulin Ratio
Women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) are profoundly insulin resistant, and the resultant hyperinsulinemia exacerbates the reproductive abnormalities of the syndrome. Agents that ameliorate insulin resistance and reduce circulating insulin levels could provide a new therapeutic modality for PCOS. Identifying the subset of PCOS women who are most insulin resistant may therefore be useful for selecting women who will respond to this therapy. We examined the correlation of basal and oral glucose-stimulated glucose and insulin levels and fasting and stimulated glucose/insulin (G:I) ratios with parameters of insulin sensitivity obtained by frequently sampled i.v. glucose tolerance test (FSIGT) to assess whether there is a simple screening test for insulin resistance in PCOS. Forty PCOS women (aged 18-40 yr; body mass index, >26 kg/m2) and 15 control women matched for age, weight, and ethnicity underwent both a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and a FSIGT. The insulin sensitivity index (S(I)) was calculated by application of the minimal model of glucose kinetics to the dynamics of plasma glucose and insulin levels during the FSIGT. The best correlation in PCOS between S(I) and a fasting I ratios (r = 0.73; P < 0.0001). A less substantial, but significant, correlation was found with fasting insulin levels (r = 0.50; P < 0.001), and no significant correlation was found with fasting glucose levels (r = 0.24; P = NS). I was more strongly correlated with S(I) than with integrated glucose and insulin responses during the OGTT. The only stronger correlation was with the OGTT 2 h G:I ratio (r = 0.74; P < 0.001). Stepwise regression analysis with S(I) as the dependent variable and fasting glucose and insulin levels, area under the curve for glucose and insulin, I ratio I ratio was significantly predictive of S(I) in the model (F to remove value = 38.1; P < 0.001). When viewed as a screening test for insulin resistance in PCOS, setting a I ratio of less than 4.5 as abnormal (using an S(I) value below the 10th percentile of our control population as evidence for insulin resistance), I ratio was 95%, the specificity was 84%, the positive predictive value was 87%, and the negative predictive value was 94%. Receiver operator curve analysis I ratio was the single best screening measure for detecting insulin resistance. I ratio may be useful as a screening test for insulin resistance in obese non-Hispanic white PCOS women. This may be a clinically useful parameter for selecting PCOS women most likely to respond to therapeutic interventions that improve insulin sensitivity.
EndometriosisFertility OutcomesEndometriosis Surgery ClaimsReproductive Treatment Access
For many patients with endometriosis, laparoscopic surgery is the most effective treatment to alleviate severe chronic pelvic pain and improve quality of life. Because endometriosis is common among individuals with infertility, surgery is often considered alongside fertility evaluation and treatment to manage symptoms, identify disease pathology, and restore pelvic anatomy. In patients who desire pregnancy, the decision of whether and when to pursue surgery should be guided by clear medical indications and shared decision making between the patient and their obstetrician-gynecologist. In recent months, however, religious and political groups have sought to reframe this medical decision as an ideologic and moral one, advocating for endometriosis surgery in nearly all patients with infertility and claiming that this can eliminate the need for assisted reproductive technologies. This framework, known as restorative reproductive medicine (RRM), aligns with efforts to promote the "personhood" of fertilized eggs, restrict access to in in vitro fertilization (IVF), and advance endometriosis surgery and lifestyle modifications as "root-cause treatment leading to natural fertility." Recent editorials and issue briefs in the obstetrics and gynecology literature have discussed the serious ethical, medical, and policy implications of RRM, yet there remains an urgent need to address specifically the unfounded claims about endometriosis surgery and its purported advantages over assisted reproductive technology. This article examines the social context of this controversy and reviews the current evidence regarding the indications, benefits, and limitations of endometriosis surgery in the management of infertility. In contrast to RRM's assertions, no evidence supports the adoption of endometriosis surgery as a replacement for IVF or as a primary treatment for infertility. Rather, the role of surgery in fertility care is highly nuanced and depends on each patient's clinical presentation, reproductive goals, and personal priorities.
To assess the Pearl Index for risk of ectopic pregnancy in women using levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systems (LNG-IUS) with hormonal reservoirs of 13.5 mg, 19.5 mg, or 52 mg. This was a retrospective cohort study. Women diagnosed with an ectopic pregnancy in Stockholm County, Sweden, between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2019, were identified through the electronic medical record system. The final analysis included 2,252 cases of ectopic pregnancy. Information on age, reproductive and medical history, as well as current use of contraception was retrieved. The time of intrauterine device (IUD) insertion before ectopic pregnancy and the numbers of sold LNG-IUS during the study period were used to calculate the incidence rate for ectopic pregnancy during use per 100 woman-years (Pearl Index). Among women with an ectopic pregnancy diagnosis, 105 presented with a known type of hormonal IUD in situ, of whom 94 were included in the calculations of the Pearl Index. The estimated Pearl Index for ectopic pregnancy was 0.136 (95% CI 0.106-0.176) for the LNG-IUS 13.5-mg, 0.037 (95% CI 0.021-0.067) for the LNG-IUS 19.5-mg, and 0.009 (95% CI 0.006-0.014) for the LNG-IUS 52-mg. With the 52-mg LNG-IUS as referent, the relative risk (RR) for ectopic pregnancy was higher during the first year for LNG 13.5-mg (RR 20.59, 95% CI 12.04-35.21), and for both 13.5-mg (RR 14.49, 95% CI 9.01-23.3) and 19.5-mg (RR 4.44, 95% CI 1.64-12.00) during the total study period. The absolute risk of ectopic pregnancy during the use of LNG-IUS at any doses was low. The results show that the lower the dose of the IUD, the higher the risk of an ectopic pregnancy. Higher-dose LNG-IUS should be considered when providing contraceptive counseling to a woman with known risk factors for ectopic pregnancy who are considering a hormonal IUD.