The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy of endoscopic repair for secondary infertility caused by post-cesarean scar defect (PCSD). Our investigation focused on the validity of new diagnostic criteria and selection methods.
Material and Methods
The subjects were 22 women with secondary infertility due to PCSD with retention of bloody fluid in the uterine cavity. Women with a residual myometrial thickness of ≥ 2.5 mm and an anteflexed or straight uterus underwent hysteroscopic surgery, while all others underwent laparoscopic repair. Hysteroscopic surgery involved resection and coagulation of scarred areas, whereas laparoscopic surgery involved removal of scarred areas combined with hysteroscopy, followed by resuturing.
Results
Fourteen of the 22 women (63.6%) who were followed up for ≥ 1 year after surgery achieved pregnancy. Pregnancies occurred in all four women (100%) who underwent hysteroscopic surgery and in 10 of the 18 women (55.6%) who underwent laparoscopic surgery. Three out of four women who underwent hysteroscopic surgery had term deliveries. Among the women who underwent laparoscopic surgery, five had term deliveries. No cases of uterine rupture were experienced, and the delivery method was cesarean section in all cases.
Conclusion
We propose that infertility associated with PCSD, cesarean scar syndrome, is caused by the retention of bloody fluid in the uterine cavity and scarring. Endoscopic treatment, such as hysteroscopy or laparoscopy, was effective for cesarean scar syndrome.
PMID 26111547 26111547 DOI 10.1111/jog.12738 10.1111/jog.12738 Tanimura et al. 2015, Tanimura 2015
Cite this article
Tanimura, S., Funamoto, H., Hosono, T., Shitano, Y., Nakashima, M., Ametani, Y., & Nakano, T. (2015). New diagnostic criteria and operative strategy for cesarean scar syndrome: Endoscopic repair for secondary infertility caused by cesarean scar defect. The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research, 41(9), 1363-1369. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.12738
Tanimura S, Funamoto H, Hosono T, Shitano Y, Nakashima M, Ametani Y, et al. New diagnostic criteria and operative strategy for cesarean scar syndrome: Endoscopic repair for secondary infertility caused by cesarean scar defect. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015;41(9):1363-1369. doi:10.1111/jog.12738
Tanimura, Satoshi, et al. "New diagnostic criteria and operative strategy for cesarean scar syndrome: Endoscopic repair for secondary infertility caused by cesarean scar defect." The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research, vol. 41, no. 9, 2015, pp. 1363-1369.
To evaluate the efficacy of surgical management for isthmoceles in patients presenting with secondary infertility. Data Sources: A systematic search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to May 2020. The search was limited to studies published in English. METHODS OF Study Selection: After the removal of duplicates, 3380 articles were screened for inclusion independently by 2 authors. These 2 authors assessed for studies which focused on women of reproductive age with a diagnosed isthmocele and secondary infertility who underwent any surgical intervention for defect repair with at least 1 of the goals being fertility restoration. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, A total of 13 studies, comprising of 1 randomized controlled trial, 6 prospective case series, and 6 retrospective case series describing 234 patients who underwent surgical management for an isthmocele and secondary infertility were included. The methodologic quality of the included studies was assessed independently by both reviewers. Next, the data extraction was performed independently and then compared to ensure no discrepancies. A total of 188 patients were treated by hysteroscopy, 36 by laparoscopy, 7 by laparotomy, and 3 through a vaginal approach. In total, 153 of the 234 patients (65.4%) achieved pregnancy across all studies within their respective study periods. Pregnancy rates in the randomized controlled trial were 21 of 28 (75%) for those treated by hysteroscopy compared with 9 of 28 (32%) for those untreated. Among the studies reporting pregnancy outcomes, 101 of 116 (87.1%) pregnancies resulted in a live birth. The incidence of adverse events was 2%, including the risk of reoperation. The results of this systematic review suggest that the surgical treatment of an isthmocele, particularly through hysteroscopy, in patients with residual myometrial thickness of at least 2.5 mm, may be effective in treating isthmocele-associated secondary infertility with a relatively low complication rate. Further high-quality studies are needed because of the small sample sizes and observational nature of most available data.
uterine-and-pelvic-conditions/acquired-uterine-conditions/isthmocelereproductive-surgery/uterine-surgery/cesarean-scar-repairrestorative-reproductive-medicine/restorative-care-and-assisted-reproduction/outcome-comparisons
Open Access
Slaoui A et al., 2025·International Journal of Surgery Case Reports
This case underscores the effectiveness of a combined laparoscopic and hysteroscopic approach in managing isthmocele, achieving symptom resolution and uterine integrity restoration. Individualized management and long-term follow-up are essential for optimizing outcomes.
The prevalence of uterine isthmocele, also known as a uterine niche, has risen in parallel with increasing cesarean section (CS) rates, affecting approximately 60% of women depending on their history of cesarean deliveries. This condition, now categorized as cesarean scar disorder (CSD) by the "Delphi consensus," is characterized by one primary or two secondary symptoms. Diagnosis can be made through transvaginal ultrasound, sonohysterography, hysteroscopy, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Management of isthmocele may involve pharmacological or surgical interventions. This review aims to provide a thorough analysis of the surgical management options, focusing on postoperative symptom relief, intraoperative and postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and impact on secondary infertility. PubMed was comprehensively searched for observational studies from inception to 07.08.2024. Surgical treatments include hysteroscopic resection, laparoscopic procedures, and vaginal approaches, all of which offer comparable symptom relief. However, the vaginal approach is associated with a longer hospital stay. The robotic-assisted approach shows promising results but lacks extensive data. Among surgical options, hysteroscopic treatment has the fewest complications but is generally avoided when residual myometrial thickness (RMT) is less than 3 mm. While many CSDs remain asymptomatic, and some women with uterine isthmocele may not wish to conceive, symptomatic patients or those desiring to conceive may benefit from surgical intervention. The choice of procedure should be based on individual patient characteristics, particularly RMT, to define the most appropriate surgical approach.
To compare outcomes of vaginal surgery in women with moderate or severe symptomatic cesarean scar defect (with or without residual myometrium).
Retrospective cohort study.
Gynecology department of a teaching hospital. Fifty-three women, between January 2014 and December 2019, underwent vaginal surgery for symptomatic cesarean scar defect: 20 women with moderate defect (with residual myometrium) and 33 with severe defect (without residual myometrium). Vaginal surgical approach to repair cesarean scar defect. MAIN surgery by comparing the myometrial residual thickness before and after surgery. The secondary objectives were evaluation of vaginal surgery efficacy on symptoms resolution, per and postoperative courses, and subsequent fertility. Failure rate was evaluated as the need for a second surgery. After vaginal surgery, the residual myometrium significantly increased from 2.4 mm ± 0.9 mm to 6.6 mm ± 2.4 mm (p <.01) in the moderate group and from 0 mm to 4.4 mm ± 2.2 mm (p <.01) in the severe group. The prevalence of abnormal uterine bleeding was significantly reduced after surgery in both groups (p <.01). Pelvic pain was significantly reduced only in the moderate group (p <.01). The rate of complications (5% vs 9.1%) and second surgery (15% vs 24.2%) were not significantly different between moderate and severe groups, respectively. The median time to conceive (7 months vs 12 months); pregnancy rates (84.6% vs 68.2%); and live birth rates (76.9% vs 50%) were not statistically significant in the moderate and severe groups respectively, with 90% of pregnancies occurring naturally. Women delivered by cesarean section at 38 weeks of gestation in both groups, and no uterine rupture was reported. Despite the absence of residual myometrium, vaginal repair of severe cesarean scar defect was effective in increasing myometrial thickness, in relieving bleeding symptoms, and in allowing to achieve pregnancy.