The objectives of this review are to identify and characterize attempts to transfer ectopic embryos to the uterus, and to understand arguments for and against the feasibility of such an intervention.
Methods
An electronic literature search involved all English language articles published in MEDLINE (1948-), Web of Science (1899-), and Scopus (1960-) before July 1, 2022. Articles were included that identify or describe attempts to transfer the embryo from its ectopic location to the uterine cavity, or discuss the feasibility of such an intervention; there were no exclusion criteria (PROSPERO registration number CRD42022364913).
Results
The initial search yielded 3060 articles; 8 articles were included. Of these, two articles were case reports that described the successful transfer of the embryo from its ectopic location to the uterus, followed by term births; both cases involved laparotomy with salpingostomy, followed by transfer of the embryonic sac into the uterine cavity through an opening made in the uterine wall. The other six articles varied in type, and provided a number of arguments for and against the feasibility of such a procedure.
Conclusions
The evidence and arguments identified in this review may help manage expectations for those interested in transferring an ectopically implanted embryo in the hope of continuing the pregnancy, but who are uncertain about the extent to which such a procedure has been attempted or may be possible. Isolated case reports, with no evidence of replication, should be interpreted with the utmost caution and do not constitute a procedure for clinical use.
ectopic pregnancy embryo transfer uterus systematic review, ectopic embryo reimplantation uterine cavity feasibility, salpingostomy ectopic embryo transfer laparotomy case report, Thomas Donovan Buskmiller ectopic embryo transfer, ectopic pregnancy surgical transfer uterus live birth, ectopic pregnancy treatment alternatives embryo preservation, tubal ectopic embryo reimplantation uterine cavity, ectopic pregnancy conservative management embryo transfer, ethics ectopic pregnancy embryo transfer feasibility, ectopic pregnancy salpingostomy embryo reimplantation term birth
PMID 37194373 37194373 DOI 10.1111/jog.15678 10.1111/jog.15678 Thomas et al. 2023, Thomas 2023
Cite this article
Thomas, C., Donovan, G. K., Fernandez, M. A., & Cara Buskmiller (2023). Efforts to transfer ectopic embryos to the uterine cavity: A systematic review. The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research, 49(8), 1991-1999. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.15678
Thomas C, Donovan GK, Fernandez MA, Cara Buskmiller. Efforts to transfer ectopic embryos to the uterine cavity: A systematic review. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2023;49(8):1991-1999. doi:10.1111/jog.15678
Thomas, C., et al. "Efforts to transfer ectopic embryos to the uterine cavity: A systematic review." The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research, vol. 49, no. 8, 2023, pp. 1991-1999.
Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) remains a major cause of tubal factor infertility. Although in vitro fertilization (IVF) has largely replaced reconstructive surgery, selected patients with mild tubal damage may still achieve natural conception after surgical repair. This case highlights a spontaneous conception following bilateral fimbrioplasty in a patient with mild post-PID distal tubal occlusion. A 33-year-old, gravida 4 para 2, woman presented with three years of secondary infertility. Hysterosalpingogram (HSG) showed mild bilateral hydrosalpinx and distal tubal occlusion, with normal ovarian reserve and hormonal evaluation. The patient underwent robotic fimbrioplasty on July 23, 2025. Operative findings included Fitz-Hugh-Curtis changes, bilateral filmy adhesions, and grade-I distal occlusion. Bilateral adhesiolysis and fimbrioplasty were performed with restoration of tubal patency on chromotubation. The postoperative course was uncomplicated. Ten weeks after surgery, the patient conceived spontaneously with a normal intrauterine pregnancy. Tubal reconstructive surgery remains a valuable fertility-preserving option for selected patients who decline or lack access to IVF. Success depends on careful patient selection, minimal tubal damage, and meticulous microsurgical technique. Tubal reconstruction can offer selected women an affordable, fertility-preserving option, especially in low-resource settings where IVF is inaccessible.
Sun Y et al., 2024·Ther Adv Reprod Health·
Open Access
Chronic endometritis (CE), frequently asymptomatic, is associated with female infertility. Fallopian tube obstruction (FTO) is also one of the factors contributing to female infertility. More than 90% of cases of proximal FTO can be successfully treated after fallopian tubal recanalization (FTR) and the spontaneous pregnancy rate of treated women after FTR is only about 30%. Potential factors affecting the success rate of FTR remain unclear. We speculate that CE may be one of the reasons affecting the recanalization of the fallopian tubes. To identify the correlation between CE and FTO, as well as the influence of CE on pregnancy outcomes following FTR.
Retrospective observational study. We retrospectively analyzed 498 women of childbearing age who underwent laparoscopy and hysteroscopy surgery for infertility. Endometrial samples were collected during surgery for CD138 immunohistochemistry staining for the diagnosis of CE. Based on the results of the tubal patency test, they were divided into two groups: the fallopian tubal patency group and the proximal FTO group. The prevalence of CE was compared between these two groups. All women with FTO underwent FTR during the operation until successful treatment was achieved. Pregnancy outcomes were assessed after a 12-month follow-up period following the procedures. Logistic regression was used to analyze factors that might affect pregnancy after FTR. The prevalence of CE in women with tubal obstruction was 30.5%, which was significantly higher than that in the fallopian tubal patency group (10.75%), p < 0.001. After FTR, the prevalence of CE in non-pregnant women was 40.18%, which was higher than that in pregnant women (40.18% vs 13.11%), and the difference was significant (p < 0.001). Multiple regression analysis showed that CE was a significant risk factor for FTO (OR: 2.54, 95% CI: 1.368-4.717, p < 0.05). In addition, CE was identified as a risk factor for infertility after FTR (OR: 4.730, 95% CI: 2.012-11.122). The presence of CE seems to decrease the likelihood of achieving spontaneous pregnancy following FTR. This observation underscores the clinical importance of early detection and treatment of CE, emphasizing the necessity for immediate intervention to prevent potential fertility complications.
Infertility is a world-wide problem, defined as failure to achieve pregnancy after 12 months of regular unprotected sexual intercourse. There are multiple causes for infertility involving both male and female factors. Fallopian tube occlusion is a common reason for female infertility. The initial attempts to treat proximal obstruction involved the use of a whalebone bougie positioned in the uterine cornua to dilate the proximal tube by Smith as early as 1849. Fluoroscopic fallopian tube recanalization for the treatment of infertility was first described in 1985. Since that time, there have been over 100 papers describing various methods for recanalization of occluded fallopian tubes. Fallopian tube recanalization is a minimally invasive procedure which is performed on an outpatient basis. It should be a first line therapy for patients with proximal occlusion of fallopian tubes.
Keltz M et al., 2022·JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
To evaluate the cannulation success rate, cumulative pregnancy, and time to intrauterine pregnancy rate following fluoroscopically-guided hysteroscopic tubal cannulation (FHTC) for infertile subjects with proximal tubal obstruction. This retrospective study evaluated subjects with unilateral or bilateral proximal tubal obstruction on hysterosalpingography, who failed concomitant selective salpingography and subsequently underwent FHTC at the time of a hysteroscopy performed for findings seen on sonohysterography. FHTC employed a Novy Catheter (CooperSurgical, Inc, Trumbull, CT.) with or without the 3 French inner catheter and guidewire, to cannulate the occluded fallopian tube(s), followed by the injection of HypaqueTM (Amersham Health, Inc, Princeton, NJ.) contrast under C-arm imaging. Technical success rates, complications, post-procedure pregnancies, and average time from surgery to pregnancy were evaluated. Thirty-two women between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2019 met the entry criteria and underwent FHTC. Of those women with bilateral obstruction, 6/6 (100%) of subjects achieved at least unilateral patency, while patency was achieved in 23/26 (88.5%) subjects with unilateral obstruction. Twenty-nine of 32 (90.6%) subjects had at least one tube successfully cannulated with 34/38 (89.5%) of proximally obstructed tubes opened. Asymptomatic tubal perforation occurred in 1/38 tubes (2.6%). Ten subjects (34.5%) achieved intrauterine pregnancies without in vitro fertilization in an average of 64.9 days from the procedure. There were no multiple pregnancies and one ectopic pregnancy. FHTC is a safe, effective, incision free procedure that results in 90% of tubes successfully cannulated, and an observed short time to intrauterine pregnancy.