Calendar-based methods are not usually considered effective or useful methods of family planning among health professionals. However, new "high-" and "low"-tech calendar methods have been developed, which are easy to teach, to use, and may be useful in helping couples avoid pregnancy. The low-tech models are based on a fixed-day calendar system. The high-tech models are based on monitoring urinary metabolites of female reproductive hormones. Both systems have high levels of satisfaction. This article describes these new models of family planning and the research on their effectiveness. The author proposes a new algorithm for determining the fertile phase of the menstrual cycle for either achieving or avoiding pregnancy.
Fehring calendar methods family planning effectiveness, fixed day calendar method fertility awareness, high tech low tech calendar fertility awareness methods, urinary hormone monitoring fertility planning algorithm, Standard Days Method calendar contraception, new calendar based family planning methods review, fertile window determination algorithm menstrual cycle, Fehring RJ fertility awareness natural family planning, electronic fertility monitor calendar method comparison, menstrual cycle calendar method avoiding achieving pregnancy
PMID 15637512 15637512 DOI 10.1016/j.jmwh.2004.07.001 10.1016/j.jmwh.2004.07.001 Fehring et al. 2005, Fehring 2005
Cite this article
Fehring, R. J. (2005). New low- and high-tech calendar methods of family planning. Journal of midwifery & women's health, 50(1), 31-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmwh.2004.07.001
Fehring RJ. New low- and high-tech calendar methods of family planning. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2005;50(1):31-38. doi:10.1016/j.jmwh.2004.07.001
Fehring, R. J. "New low- and high-tech calendar methods of family planning." Journal of midwifery & women's health, vol. 50, no. 1, 2005, pp. 31-38.
Fehring RJ et al., 2015·J Midwifery Womens Health·
The length of periodic abstinence, due to overestimation of the fertile phase of the menstrual cycle, is often a cause for dissatisfaction, discontinuation, and user error with natural family planning (NFP) methods. The objective of this research was to compare the length of required abstinence (ie, estimated fertility) and coital frequency between 2 NFP methods. This was an analysis of data from a 12-month prospective comparison study in which participants were randomized into either an electronic hormonal fertility monitor (EHFM) group or a cervical mucus monitoring (CMM) group-both of which included a fertility algorithm as a double check for the beginning and end of the estimated fertile window. The number of days of estimated fertility and coitus was extracted from each menstrual cycle of data, and t tests were used to compare the means of these 2 variables between the 2 NFP methods. The study involved 197 women (mean [SD] age 29.7 [5.4]) who used the EHFM to estimate the fertile window and 160 women (mean [SD] age 30.4 [5.3]) who used CMM to estimate the fertile window. They produced 1,669 menstrual cycles of data. After 12 months of use, the EHFM group had statistically fewer days of estimated fertility than the CMM group (mean [SD] days, 13.25 [2.79] vs 13.68 [2.99], respectively; t = 2.07; P = .039) and significantly more coitus (mean [SD] coital acts, 4.22 [3.16] vs 4.05 [2.88], respectively; t = 1.17; P = .026). The use of the EHFM seems to provide more objectivity and confidence in self-estimating the fertile window and using nonfertile days for intercourse when avoiding pregnancy.
In many animals, olfactory cues are key for recognizing their sex, kinship, and reproductive status. In humans, it has been proposed that males find female body odors attractive during the ovulatory phase, coinciding with peak fertility. However, the molecular and physiological foundations of this attractiveness remain unclear. In this study, we combined sensory evaluation with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry for chemical analysis and identified volatile compounds that fluctuate across menstrual cycle phases. We identified three ovulatory phase-increasing compounds that mitigate the basal unpleasant axillary odor, resulting in the ovulatory-phase body odor being perceived as the most pleasant by males. Additionally, these compounds alleviated hostility and stress induced by the basal axillary odor, leading to relaxation in males and an enhanced positive impression of female facial images. Our results suggest that several ovulatory phase-increasing compounds may contribute to the positive effects of ovulatory female odor on males, as proposed in previous research.
Damba-Cunningham E et al., 2025·J Restorative Reprod Med·
Open Access
Fertility awareness-based methods (FABM) of family planning have increased in popularity in recent years. The effectiveness of various methods can vary substantially and can be user dependent. For various reasons, there is a bias in OBGYN physicians against the use of FABMs for family planning. However, once educated about the methods of FABMs, this bias improves. There is limited regarding the education dedicated to FABM use in residency. We hypothesized that the residency education obtained regarding FABMs would be insufficient in preparing resident OBGYNs in effectively counseling patients regarding FABMs. a 16-question survey was created via SurveyMonkey and was sent to all ACGME accredited OBGYN residency programs for distribution to current residents. The survey was administered from October 2023 to December 2023. 125 responses were collected. Less than 40% of residents received formal training in regards to FABMs. Respondents indicated they felt most comfortable describing the calendar method to patients (68% respondents agree or strongly agree when queried if they could describe the method). 79.5% of respondents could not describe mucus-only, hormone monitoring, or sympto-thermal methods of family planning. When questioned if they were prepared to counsel postpartum patients who refused contraception regarding FABM, 58% of respondents indicated they could not assist their patients. Despite increased use in recent years and multiple options for FABM use, resident education in the application and use of FABMs is lacking. Additionally, residents indicated they are most familiar with the least effective methods (calendar method) which would likely be a significant detriment to their patients.
Some medical professional organizations have advocated for including the menstrual cycle as a vital sign in adolescence, but not in adulthood. However, documenting menstrual cycle patterns is not routine clinical or research practice. Vital signs are used to predict health outcomes, indicate needed treatment, and monitor a clinical course. They can help identify pathologies, affirm wellness, and are responsive to exposures. Here we review the scientific evidence showing how the menstrual cycle meets these criteria and should therefore be treated as a vital sign. Using key words and controlled vocabulary terms, we carried out multiple literature searches, prioritizing the inclusion of systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and clinical practice guidelines. This review describes how the menstrual cycle is a health indicator, can cyclically impact health conditions, and its associations with long-term post-menopausal health outcomes. We review exposures influencing the menstrual cycle, evidence underlying its use to optimize wellness, and available tools for documenting cycles. Supplementary materials include patient handouts on menstrual cycle tracking, and an index of related clinical practice guidelines and reviews by subject. The menstrual cycle is a vital sign from menarche through menopause, an underutilized but powerful tool for understanding gynecological and general health.