Menstrual Cycle Cycle Across the Lifespan

Modeling fertile window differences across the reproductive lifespan with quantitative urine hormone monitoring of the menstrual cycle

Bouchard TP, Fehring RJ, Meyers M, Stujenske T, Boychuk L, Smith A, Schweinsberg K, Scarpa B, Schneider M

Published July 13, 2026 Journal of ovarian research
DOI 10.1186/s13048-026-02184-w PMID 42443950

RRM Academy Synopsis

Fertile window hormones differ in PCOS, postpartum and perimenopause

Hormone patterns in the fertile window differ by reproductive category, a cohort study of 57 women found. The groups were regular cycles, PCOS (Polyendocrine Metabolic Ovarian Syndrome, PMOS), postpartum and perimenopause. Women tested their own urine at home.

Key Findings

  • Fifty-seven women aged 22-51 took part and provided 444 cycles. Each cycle averaged 11.6 days of Mira urine testing.
  • Estrogen ran relatively low in the perimenopause and PCOS/PMOS groups. Perimenopause also brought a low luteal progesterone metabolite, pregnanediol glucuronide.
  • Luteal pregnanediol glucuronide ran high with PCOS/PMOS. Luteinizing hormone ran significantly higher in perimenopause, in the model's follicular phase and fertile window.
  • Postpartum transition cycles ran significantly longer than regular cycles (p = 0.01). Postpartum women had a shorter luteal phase than every other group (p < 0.001).

Interpretation

This prospective observational cohort had a feasibility aim. Ovulation was estimated as the day of the Mira monitor's luteinizing hormone surge. The authors name the lack of ultrasound-confirmed ovulation as their main limitation. They conclude that fertile window hormone thresholds vary by reproductive category, so women in different circumstances should not necessarily share the same thresholds. They call for a larger dataset.

RRM Context

Marquette Method teachers, who teach fertility awareness, recruited the participants. Daily hormone data across a whole cycle shows how each woman's cycle behaves in PCOS, after birth and near menopause.

Abstract

Background

Reproductive hormones of the fertile window are often referenced to women in regular cycles, but this may not be representative of the hormonal profiles of women in different circumstances like polycystic ovarian syndrome, the postpartum period, and the perimenopause transition. This observational cohort study sought to identify the variability in the reproductive hormones in various clinical circumstances and to establish potential thresholds for each category based on hormone measurements with the Mira urinary hormone monitor.

Results

A total of 57 women (ages 22-51) in various circumstances (regular cycles, polycystic ovarian syndrome, postpartum and perimenopause) tracked Mira urine hormone measurements (estrone-3-glucuronide, luteinizing hormone, pregnanediol glucuronide), contributing 444 cycles of data. Using additive mixed models, hormone values were stratified by the four different reproductive categories. The perimenopause and polycystic ovarian syndrome groups demonstrated relative hypoestrogenic states, while the perimenopause group showed low luteal pregnanediol glucuronide and the polycystic ovarian syndrome/polyendocrine metabolic ovarian syndrome (PCOS/PMOS) group showed high luteal pregnanediol glucuronide. The perimenopause group had significantly higher luteinizing hormone values throughout the whole cycle.

Conclusion

The fertile window hormone thresholds vary depending on a woman's specific reproductive category. Women in different circumstances should not necessarily use the same hormonal thresholds for the fertile window and ovulation. A larger dataset with ultrasound correlation to ovulation is required to delineate the fertile window with more precision. Hormone differences across the menstrual cycle could be used for targeted treatments in polycystic ovarian syndrome and perimenopause women.

Topics

By this author

Related research

Menstrual Cycle › Cycle Across the Lifespan › Cycle and General Health · Reproductive Endocrinology › Ovarian Hormones › Estrogen · Fertility Awareness › Biomarkers › Urinary Hormone Monitoring
Thomas P Bouchard, Richard J Fehring, Maria Meyers, Theresa Stujenske, Louise Boychuk, Amanda Smith, Katherine Schweinsberg, Bruno Scarpa, Mary Schneider
Tom Bouchard, T Bouchard, Rick Fehring, Dick Fehring, Rich Fehring, R Fehring, M Meyers, T Stujenske, L Boychuk, A Smith, Kathy Schweinsberg, Kate Schweinsberg, Katie Schweinsberg, K Schweinsberg, B Scarpa, M Schneider
PMID 42443950 42443950 DOI 10.1186/s13048-026-02184-w 10.1186/s13048-026-02184-w Bouchard et al. 2026, Bouchard 2026