Endometriosis · Surgical Treatment
Lee CE, Allaire C, Williams C, Bedaiwy MA, Noga H, Hanley GE, Lisonkova S, Albert A, Yong PJ
Cite this paper
For EndNote, Zotero or Mendeley:
License
No open license is recorded for this paper. Reuse terms are set by the publisher.
To prospectively evaluate pain-related quality-of-life (Endometriosis Health Profile-30 [EHP-30] pain subscale) after surgery at an interdisciplinary centre of expertise for endometriosis and pelvic pain.
A prospective cohort study was completed of persons undergoing surgical management for pelvic pain between December 2013 and July 2016 at an interdisciplinary tertiary referral centre for pelvic pain and endometriosis. We compared the change in EHP-30 scores for the following scenarios: (1) type of surgery (conservative surgery vs. hysterectomy), (2) stage of endometriosis (stage I/II vs. III/IV), and (3) age (age <40 vs. age ≥40 years). We used mixed-effects models to evaluate changes in pain during follow-up after surgery.
Overall, 595 individuals met our inclusion criteria; the follow-up rate was 65.9% (392/595). In total, 436 (73.3%) underwent conservative surgery, while 159 (26.7%) underwent hysterectomy. Improvements in pain-related quality-of-life were seen for both conservative surgery and hysterectomy but greater improvements were seen with hysterectomy (P < 0.001). For conservative surgery, similar improvements in quality-of-life were observed regardless of endometriosis stage (I/II vs. III/IV) (P = 0.84) or age (<40 or ≥40 years old) (P = 0.87). We also observed similar improvements in quality-of-life regardless of stage (P = 0.24) or age (P = 0.71) after hysterectomy.
At an interdisciplinary centre of expertise, there were significant improvements in quality-of-life after endometriosis surgery. These improvements were seen for both conservative surgery and hysterectomy (although greater improvement with the latter), for early and advanced stage disease, and younger and older patients.
Rojas HE et al., 2026 · Journal of women's health (2002)
To characterize differences between individuals with and without mid-cycle pain in a registry cohort with endometriosis. Prospective analysis of data from the Endometriosis Pelvic Pain Interdisciplinary Cohort Data Registry (Clinicaltrials.gov #NCT02911090) at a tertiary referral center in Western Canada. Three hundred forty-five individuals aged 18-49 years who: (1) had at least one episode of menstrual bleeding in the last 3 months, (2) attended a baseline initial visit, and (3) subsequently had surgery with histological confirmation of endometriosis between January 2018 and December 2023. Exclusion criteria included (1) previous hysterectomy; (2) hormonal suppressive therapy use in the last 3 months; and (3) missing data on mid-cycle pain, history of hormonal therapy use, or menstrual cycle regularity. N/A. Mid-cycle pain in the last month versus No mid-cycle pain in the last month. Of the 345 participants, 67% (n = 232) reported mid-cycle pain in the last month. Mid-cycle pain in the last month was significantly associated with higher mean Central Sensitization Inventory score (48 ± 17 versus 36 ± 16, p < 0.001) and more months of prior hormonal suppressive therapy use (58 [14-120] versus 26 [0-109], p = 0.012). Abnormal anatomy at the time of surgery (e.g., endometrioma, ovarian adhesions) was not associated with mid-cycle pain in the last month. In this endometriosis cohort at a tertiary referral center, most participants reported mid-cycle pain in the last month, which was associated with central sensitization but was not clearly related to endometriosis anatomical distortion.
Bouchard TP et al., 2026 · Reproductive biomedicine online · Free to read
Do quantitative urinary hormone measurements on the Mira monitor predict and confirm ovulation accurately compared with ultrasound in women with regular menstrual cycles? Do Mira urine hormones correlate with serum hormones? This was a prospective, single-centre, blinded diagnostic accuracy study with 52 women aged 19-44 years with regular cycles (24-38 days) who tracked 153 cycles over 18 months. Daily first-morning urine was tested with the Mira monitor for follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), oestrone-3-glucuronide (E13G), luteinizing hormone (LH) and pregnanediol glucuronide (PDG). Serial transvaginal ultrasounds (890 scans) confirmed the day of ovulation. Serum hormones were measured twice per cycle. The 121 ovulatory cycles from 49 participants with sufficient index test and reference standard data were included in the final analysis. The Mira LH peak day strongly predicted ultrasound-confirmed ovulation (R² = 0.96, P < 0.001; intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.971), with 96% of ovulations occurring within ±1 day. The Mira PDG increase was also strongly associated with ultrasound-confirmed day of ovulation (R² = 0.87, P < 0.001). First-morning urine hormones were significantly associated with serum hormones when collected within 90 min (LH: R² = 0.92; E13G: R² = 0.73; R² = 0.61; R² = 0.75). Anovulatory cycles were identified in 11% of regularly cycling participants. Quantitative urinary hormone monitoring with the Mira monitor provides accurate prediction and confirmation of ovulation, with strong urine-serum associations supporting reduced reliance on serial serum draws in select patients. These findings support clinical adoption of quantitative urinary fertility monitoring.
Balachandran S et al., 2026 · Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC
To assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on reproductive outcomes in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) and the influence of material and social deprivation on these outcomes. This retrospective cohort study included RPL patients seen at a specialized clinic between March 1, 2018, and February 28, 2022. Patients were categorized into two groups based on care period: pre-pandemic (March 1, 2018-February 29, 2020) and pandemic (March 1, 2020-February 28, 2022). Cumulative probabilities of birth were estimated using the cumulative incidence function within a competing risk framework, treating pregnancy loss as a competing event. Fine and Gray regression models calculated sub-distribution hazard ratio (sHR) of birth. 544 patients were included in the study, with 255 in the pre-pandemic group and 289 in the pandemic group. Individuals in the pandemic group were less likely to achieve pregnancy than those in the pre-pandemic group (relative risk = 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39 - 0.66). Among those who conceived, the cumulative probability of live birth was 0.77 in both groups. Relative to individuals residing in high-social deprivation neighborhoods, those living in moderately deprived areas had higher sub-distribution hazards of live birth (adjusted sHR = 1.97, 95% CI 1.25 - 3.10; P = 0.003). Within specialized RPL care and a universal maternity care system, pregnancy rates were lower during the first two years of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, among those who conceived, the probability of achieving a live birth remained similar between the pre-pandemic and pandemic periods.
Bouchard TP et al., 2026 · Reproductive biomedicine online · Free to read
Does formation of the corpus luteum help to identify the day of ovulation on ultrasound when follicular collapse is missed, and how reliable are sonographers versus a review panel in identifying the day of ovulation on ultrasound? Sonographers in a clinic in Canada performed serial endovaginal ultrasound scans (six to eight per cycle) to identify the day of ovulation in regularly cycling women (n = 40) who were followed for one to five cycles (n = 85). The day of ovulation was identified by: (i) identification of the dominant follicle; (ii) disappearance of the dominant follicle; and (iii) identification and dating of the corpus luteum. The main outcome measures were inter-rater reliability between two sonographers, and Bland-Altman agreement between the supervising sonographer and a panel that reviewed each scan to identify the day of ovulation. Of the 85 menstrual cycles reviewed, two cycles did not have sufficient data to date ovulation, one cycle showed an incidental dermoid cyst, and 11 cycles showed anovulatory patterns. This left a total of 71 cycles (84%) for which intra-rater reliability between two sonographers for identifying the day of ovulation was high (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.99, P < 0.0001), and Bland-Altman agreement showed no significant difference in the estimated day of ovulation between the supervising sonographer and the panel (t = -0.28, P = 0.78). Corpus luteum criteria were necessary to help identify the day of ovulation in 14 of 71 cycles (20%). The estimated day of ovulation can be determined reliably on ultrasound by trained sonographers using collapse of the dominant follicle and formation of the corpus luteum based on six to eight scans per cycle.
Abbott J, 2003 · Human Reproduction
This study investigates the outcomes for women up to 5 years after laparoscopic excision of endometriosis. In this prospective observational cohort study, 254 women with chronic pelvic pain were referred to two units specializing in minimal access surgical management of endometriosis. Of these, 216 women underwent surgical assessment and 176 were confirmed to have endometriosis. Questionnaires and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for dysmenorrhoea, non-menstrual pelvic pain, dyspareunia and dyschesia as well as quality of life instruments; the EQ-5Dindex and EQ-5Dvas, Short-Form 12 (SF-12) and sexual activity questionnaires were completed pre-operatively. Intra-operative details of revised American Fertility Society (rAFS) stage, site of disease, associated tests, duration of surgery and complications were noted. Follow-up was performed by postal questionnaire and chart review. For women who had further surgery, rAFS stage, site of disease, other procedures and histology were all recorded. Pain scores were all significantly reduced at 2-5 years for dysmenorrhoea (median VAS baseline versus follow-up 2-5 years); 9 versus 3.3 (P < 0.0001), non-menstrual pelvic pain 8 versus 3 (P < 0.0001), dyspareunia 7 versus 0 (P < 0.0001) and dyschesia 7 versus 2 (P < 0.0001). Quality of life was improved for the EQ-5Dindex (P = 0.008 and the EQ-5Qvas (P = 0.03) and for sexual function with pleasure (P = 0.001) and habit (P = 0.012) being improved and discomfort being decreased (P = 0.001). The chance of requiring further surgery as determined by the Kaplan-Meier survival curve was 36%. A rAFS score of >70 was predictive of requiring further surgery (P = 0.03). Of women who had further surgery, endometriosis was found histologically in 68%. Laparoscopic excision of endometriosis significantly reduces pain and improves quality of life for up to 5 years. The probability of requiring further surgery is 36%. Return of pain following laparoscopic excision is not always associated with clinical evidence of recurrence.
McDonnell R et al., 2025 · Gynecology and minimally invasive therapy · Free full text on PubMed Central
Long AJ et al., 2023 · American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
More research is needed that compares the outcomes between those who underwent a hysterectomy for endometriosis with conservation of one or both ovaries and those who underwent a hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. This study aimed to compare the rate and types of reoperations (primary outcome) and use of other pain-related health services (secondary outcomes) among people who underwent a hysterectomy with conservation of both ovaries, those who underwent a hysterectomy with unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and those who underwent a hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. This was a population-based, retrospective cohort study of 4489 patients aged 19 to 50 years in British Columbia, Canada, who underwent a hysterectomy for endometriosis between 2001 and 2016. Index surgeries were classified as hysterectomy alone (conservation of both ovaries), hysterectomy with unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, or hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Reoperation rate was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes (measured at 3-12 months and 1-5 years after hysterectomy) included physician visits for endometriosis and pelvic pain, prescriptions filled for opioids, and use of hormonal suppression medications and hormone replacement therapy. Reoperation rates were low across all groups, with 89.5% of all patients remaining reoperation free by the end of follow-up (median of 10 years; interquartile range, 6.1-14.3 years). Patients who underwent a hysterectomy alone were more likely to undergo at least 1 reoperation when compared with those who underwent a hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (13% vs 5%; P<.0001), most commonly an oophorectomy or adhesiolysis. When oophorectomy as reoperation was removed in a sensitivity analysis, this difference was partially attenuated (6% of hysterectomy alone group vs 3% of hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy group undergoing at least 1 reoperation). All groups were very similar in terms of rates of physician visits for endometriosis or pelvic pain and the number of days of opioid prescriptions filled. Furthermore, the rate of hormonal suppression medication use was similar among the groups, whereas the rate of prescriptions filled for hormone replacement therapy after hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was 60.6% of patients who filled at least 1 prescription at 3 to 12 months after index surgery. Patients who underwent a hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy had a lower reoperation rate than those who underwent a hysterectomy with conservation of one or both ovaries. However, there was little difference between the groups for the secondary outcomes measured, including physician visits for endometriosis and pelvic pain, opioid use, and use of hormonal suppression medications, suggesting that persistent pelvic pain after hysterectomy for endometriosis may not differ substantively based on ovarian conservation status. One limitation was the inability to stratify patients by stage of endometriosis or to determine the impact of endometriosis stage or the presence of adnexal disease or deep endometriosis on the outcomes. Moreover, hormone replacement therapy prescriptions was not filled by about 40% of patients after hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, which may have significant health consequences for these individuals undergoing premature surgical menopause. Therefore, strong consideration should be given to ovarian conservation at the time of hysterectomy for endometriosis.
Tucker DR et al., 2023 · American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
After endometriosis surgery, pain can persist or recur in a subset of patients. A possible reason for persistent pain after surgery is central nervous system sensitization and associated pelvic pain comorbidities. Surgery addresses the peripheral component of endometriosis pain pathophysiology (by lesion removal) but may not treat this centralized pain. Therefore, endometriosis patients with pelvic pain comorbidities related to central sensitization may experience worse pain-related outcomes after surgery, such as lower pain-related quality of life. This study aimed to determine whether baseline (preoperative) pelvic pain comorbidities are associated with pain-related quality of life at follow-up after endometriosis surgery. This study used longitudinal prospective registry data from the Endometriosis Pelvic Pain Interdisciplinary Cohort at the BC Women's Centre for Pelvic Pain and Endometriosis. Participants were aged ≤50 years with confirmed or clinically suspected endometriosis, and underwent surgery (fertility-sparing or hysterectomy) for endometriosis pain. Participants completed the pain subscale of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 quality of life questionnaire preoperatively and at follow-up (1-2 years). Linear regression was performed to measure the individual relationships between 7 pelvic pain comorbidities at baseline and follow-up Endometriosis Health Profile-30 score, controlling for baseline Endometriosis Health Profile-30 and type of surgery received. These baseline (preoperative) pelvic pain comorbidities included abdominal wall pain, pelvic floor myalgia, painful bladder syndrome, irritable bowel syndrome, Patient Health Questionnaire 9 depression score, Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 score, and Pain Catastrophizing Scale score. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression was then performed to select the most important variables associated with follow-up Endometriosis Health Profile-30 from 17 covariates (including the 7 pelvic pain comorbidities, baseline Endometriosis Health Profile-30 score, type of surgery, and other endometriosis-related factors such as stage and histologic confirmation of endometriosis). Using 1000 bootstrap samples, we estimated the coefficients and confidence intervals of the selected variables and generated a covariate importance rank. The study included 444 participants. The median follow-up time was 18 months. Pain-related quality of life (Endometriosis Health Profile-30) of the study population significantly improved at follow-up after surgery (P<.001). The following pelvic pain comorbidities were associated with lower quality of life (higher Endometriosis Health Profile-30 score) after surgery, controlling for baseline Endometriosis Health Profile-30 score and type of surgery (fertility-sparing vs hysterectomy): abdominal wall pain (P=.013), pelvic floor myalgia (P=.036), painful bladder syndrome (P=.022), Patient Health Questionnaire 9 score (P<.001), Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 score (P<.001), and Pain Catastrophizing Scale score (P=.007). Irritable bowel syndrome was not significant (P=.70). Of the 17 covariates included for least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression, 6 remained in the final model (lambda=3.136). These included 3 pelvic pain comorbidities that were associated with higher follow-up Endometriosis Health Profile-30 scores or worse quality of life: abdominal wall pain (β=3.19), pelvic floor myalgia (β=2.44), and Patient Health Questionnaire 9 depression score (β=0.49). The other 3 variables in the final model were baseline Endometriosis Health Profile-30 score, type of surgery, and histologic confirmation of endometriosis. Pelvic pain comorbidities present at baseline before surgery, which may reflect underlying central nervous system sensitization, are associated with lower pain-related quality of life after endometriosis surgery. Particularly important were depression and musculoskeletal/myofascial pain (abdominal wall pain and pelvic floor myalgia). Therefore, these pelvic pain comorbidities should be candidates for a formal prediction model of pain outcomes after endometriosis surgery.
