C-reactive protein (CRP) is an acute-phase protein synthesized by the liver during the course of a large number of diseases. During gestation and parturition, progressively increasing numbers of gravida develop elevated levels up to 32, 48 to 80 per cent, respectively). These elevations in pregnancy, the nonspecificity of the test, and the inability to function as a reliable marker of fetal and/or maternal infectious morbidity have obscured the pragmatic utility of CRP determinations in both obstetrics and gynecology. Because of its biophysical kinetics, C-reactive protein determinations are best used as a monitoring parameter after the documentation of infection rather than as a diagnostic indicator of infection. They can provide valuable end titration points for termination of parenteral antibiotic therapy.
PMID 2657521 2657521 DOI 10.1097/00006254-198905000-00013 10.1097/00006254-198905000-00013
Cite this article
Chaisilwattana, P., & Monif, G. R. (1989). Potential use of C-reactive protein determinations in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstetrical & gynecological survey, 44(5), 355-360. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006254-198905000-00013
Chaisilwattana P, Monif GR. Potential use of C-reactive protein determinations in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1989;44(5):355-360. doi:10.1097/00006254-198905000-00013
Chaisilwattana, Pongsakdi, and Gilles R. Monif. "Potential use of C-reactive protein determinations in obstetrics and gynecology." Obstetrical & gynecological survey, vol. 44, no. 5, 1989, pp. 355-360.
Keywords
C-Reactive Protein/analysis/physiology, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/blood/diagnosis, C-Reactive Protein
This article reviews the arguments for the use of multifetal pregnancy reduction (MFPR) for the prevention of preterm deliveries in triplet and higher order multiple pregnancies and evaluates its effectiveness based on data from published studies. The arguments in favour of pregnancy reduction are based on the substantial mortality and morbidity associated with these pregnancies. Triplets and higher order multiples have increased rates of preterm delivery and intrauterine growth retardation, both of which are independent risk factors for death and handicap. Even controlling for gestational age, rates of mortality and handicap are higher for multiples than for singletons. Moreover, the family's risk of losing a child or having a handicapped child is greater because there are more infants at risk. MFPR effectively lowers these risk by reducing the frequency of preterm delivery. However, its effectiveness may be limited. In some studies, the proportion of preterm deliveries in reduced pregnancies remains above levels found in spontaneous twin or singleton pregnancies and MFPR does not appear to reduce the prevalence of low birth weight. Furthermore, the procedure itself it increases the risk of miscarriage, premature rupture of the membranes and causes adverse psychological effects such as grief or depression for many patients. The authors note that a majority of the higher order multiple pregnancies result from a medical intervention in the first place, either through IVF techniques or the use of ovulation stimulation drugs. Although MFPR is an effective measure for reducing the substantial morbidity and mortality associated with higher order multiple pregnancies, preventive methods, such as limiting to 2 the number of embryos transferred for IVF and better control of the use of ovulation induction drugs, remain more effective and less intrusive.
To assess the outcome of pregnancy following assisted conception. Cohort descriptive study. Unit of Reproductive Medicine, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School. One hundred and forty-eight consecutive assisted conceptions. Patient characteristics and outcome of pregnancy. Seventy-nine percent of mothers were aged between 26 and 35 years (mean 31.4). The main causes of infertility were tubal (48%), unexplained (35%), anovulatory (8%) and male factor (8%). Primary infertility accounted for 61% of cases and 82% of pregnancies occurred within 3 treatment cycles. Thirty-five (24%) pregnancies miscarried before 14 weeks and 7 (5%) between 15 and 24 weeks gestation. One hundred and three pregnancies resulted in 136 liveborn infants. There was one neonatal death. Thirty-five babies were admitted to SCBU. Antenatally, 13% of patients were admitted to hospital with hypertension and 8% with APH; 50% of multiple and 13% of singleton pregnancies were delivered prematurely, 68% following preterm labour. There were 28 sets of twins (four miscarried at less than 24 weeks) and four sets of triplets. Multiple pregnancy was not associated with cause of infertility, treatment, age or ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Seventy-eight per cent of singletons and 50% of multipara were delivered vaginally. Our data confirm the high incidence of pregnancy loss and preterm delivery associated with assisted conception once allowing for the high rate of multiple pregnancies. The effect of assisted conception programme on health services is discussed.
PregnancyPreterm DeliveryIVF OutcomesSmall for Gestational Age
The Medical Research Council In-Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Register report on births resulting from assisted conception in Great Britain demonstrated a high incidence of preterm and low birthweight babies. This incidence remained high even when the analysis was restricted to singleton babies. The present paper investigates possible risk factors for prematurity, low birthweight and small-for-gestational-age (SGA) in singleton IVF births. Thirteen per cent of singleton IVF babies were preterm, 11% low birthweight and 17% small-for-gestational-age. Analysis by multiple regression indicated that hypertension during pregnancy was an independent risk for preterm delivery, low birthweight and SGA, bleeding during pregnancy for preterm delivery, and the number of embryos transferred and the type of infertility for low birthweight.
Gelbaya TA et al., 2014·Obstetrical & gynecological survey
The diagnosis of unexplained infertility can be made only after excluding common causes of infertility using standard fertility investigations,which include semen analysis, assessment of ovulation, and tubal patency test. These tests have been selected as they have definitive correlation with pregnancy. It is estimated that a standard fertility evaluation will fail to identify an abnormality in approximately 15% to 30% of infertile couples. The reported incidence of such unexplained infertility varies according to the age and selection criteria in the study population. We conducted a review of the literature via MEDLINE. Articles were limited to English-language, human studies published between 1950 and 2013. Since first coined more than 50 years ago, the term unexplained infertility has been a subject of debate. Although additional investigations are reported to explain or define other causes of infertility, these have high false-positive results and therefore cannot be recommended for routine clinical practice. Couples with unexplained infertility might be reassured that even after 12 months of unsuccessful attempts, 50% will conceive in the following 12 months and another 12% in the year after.