Endometriosis · Pathophysiology

Somatic PTEN and ARID1A loss and endometriosis disease burden: a longitudinal study

Tucker DR, Lee AF, Orr NL, Alotaibi FT, Noga HL, Williams C, Allaire C, Bedaiwy MA, Huntsman DG, Köbel M, Anglesio MS, Yong PJ

Published February 2025 Human reproduction (Oxford, England)
DOI 10.1093/humrep/deae269 PMID 39701665 PMC PMC11788214
Read our synopsis

RRM Academy Synopsis

PTEN loss in endometriosis tissue is linked to more severe disease

PTEN loss in endometriosis tissue was associated with more severe disease, and with more complex surgery. The prospective cohort followed 126 people from one Canadian referral center for 5 to 9 years. Pain scores did not differ by PTEN status.

Key Findings

  • PTEN loss was found in 46.4% (13/28) with superficial disease only, 72.7% (16/23) with deep or ovarian disease only, and 85.1% (57/67) with mixed types (P < 0.001).
  • PTEN loss rose with rASRM stage: Stage I 47.8% (11/23), Stage II 73.7% (14/17), Stage III 80.8% (21/26), Stage IV 81.0% (34/42) (P = 0.024).
  • PTEN loss was associated with a higher need for ureterolysis (freeing the ureter from surrounding tissue) (P = 0.02) and longer mean surgical times (P = 0.033).
  • Pain scores at baseline and at follow-up showed no significant differences by PTEN status, ARID1A status, or having two or more somatic events.
  • Reoperation occurred in 13.5% (17/126) over 5 to 9 years. Among people with complete marker data, reoperation-free survival did not differ significantly by combinations of somatic events (log-rank P = 0.44).

Interpretation

The study is a prospective cohort at one referral center, so it shows association and cannot show that PTEN loss causes severe disease. Loss was read by protein staining, with no sequencing of the underlying mutations. The 68.3% PTEN loss rate counts any loss in any sampled lesion. A stricter cutoff of 50% or more loss in at least one sample gave 32.5%. ARID1A loss was less common, which limited power. Most participants were White (74.6%). After adjusting for stage or subtype, the higher PTEN loss rate in non-White participants was not statistically significant. Few reoperations limited that analysis.

RRM Context

Restorative reproductive medicine centers on excision of endometriosis, the surgery every participant here had, alone (73%, 92/126) or with hysterectomy. The authors cite literature in which stage and pain track poorly. In this cohort, PTEN loss tracked stage and did not track pain. The authors call for further research on PTEN and other somatic events in a future molecular classification of endometriosis. The study offers no test or treatment based on them.

Abstract

Study Question

Is there an association between the somatic loss of PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homolog) and ARID1A (AT-rich interaction domain 1A) and endometriosis disease severity and worse clinical outcomes?

Summary Answer

Somatic PTEN loss in endometriosis epithelium was associated with greater disease burden and subsequent surgical complexity.

What Is Known Already

Somatic cancer-driver mutations including those involving the PTEN and ARID1A genes exist in endometriosis without cancer; however, their clinical impact remains unclear.

Study Design, Size, Duration

This prospective longitudinal study involved endometriosis tissue and clinical data from 126 participants who underwent surgery at a tertiary center for endometriosis (2013-2017), with a follow-up period of 5-9 years.

Participants/Materials, Setting, Methods

PTEN and ARID1A loss was assessed using established immunohistochemistry (IHC) methods as proxies for somatic loss by two independent raters. PTEN and ARID1A status for each participant was defined as loss (loss in at least one sample for a participant) or retained (no loss in all samples for a participant). Primary analyses examined associations between PTEN and ARID1A loss and disease burden based on anatomic subtype (superficial peritoneal endometriosis (SUP), deep endometriosis (DE), ovarian endometrioma (OMA)) and rASRM stage (I-IV). Secondary analyses explored associations of PTEN and ARID1A loss with demographics, surgical difficulty, and pain scores (baseline and follow-up). Additionally, using previously published data on KRAS codon 12 mutations for this cohort, we investigated associations between variables in the primary and secondary analyses and acquiring two or more somatic events (PTEN loss, ARID1A loss, or KRAS mutation) in this cohort. The risk of reoperation over the 5-9 years was also examined.

Main Results and the Role of Chance

PTEN loss (68.3%; 86 participants) exceeded ARID1A loss (24.6%; 31 participants). Inter-rater reliability was substantial for PTEN (k = 0.69; 95% CI: 0.62-0.77) and ARID1A (k = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.51-0.77). PTEN loss was significantly associated with more severe anatomic subtypes (P < 0.001; participants with SUP only = 46.4%; participants with DE only or OMA only = 72.7%; participants with mixed subtypes = 85.1%), and higher stages (P = 0.024; Stage I = 47.8%; Stage II = 73.7%; Stage III = 80.8%; Stage IV = 81.0%). Results were similar for ARID1A loss, albeit with smaller sample size limiting power. PTEN loss was further associated with non-White ethnicities (P = 0.017) and greater surgical difficulty (more frequent need for ureterolysis) (P = 0.02). There were no differences in pain scores (baseline or follow-up) based on PTEN or ARID1A status. Reoperation was uncommon (13.5% of the cohort), and patterns in reoperation rates based on the presence of somatic alterations did not reach statistical significance.

Limitations, Reasons for Caution

Sequencing was not performed to determine the type of PTEN and ARID1A somatic mutations resulting in loss of expression.

Wider Implications of the Findings

These results demonstrate a link between PTEN somatic loss and greater endometriosis disease burden. These findings underscore the potential relevance of PTEN loss and other somatic driver mutations in a future molecular classification of endometriosis.

Study Funding/Competing Interests

This study was funded by Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) project grant (MOP-142273 and PJT-156084). P.J.Y. was supported by a Health Professional Investigator award from Michael Smith Health Research BC, Canada, and a Canada Research Chair (Tier 2) in Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain. M.S.A. was supported by a Michael Smith Health Research BC Scholar award, and CIHR project grants (369990, 462997, and 456767). The sponsors did not play any role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to [truncated]

Topics

By this author

Related research

Endometriosis › Pathophysiology › Genetics
Dwayne R Tucker, Anna F Lee, Fahad T Alotaibi, Catherine Allaire, Mohamed A Bedaiwy, David G Huntsman, Martin Köbel, Michael S Anglesio, Paul J Yong
D Tucker, A Lee, F Alotaibi, Cathy Allaire, Kate Allaire, C Allaire, M Bedaiwy, Dave Huntsman, D Huntsman, M Köbel, Mike Anglesio, M Anglesio, P Yong
PMID 39701665 39701665 DOI 10.1093/humrep/deae269 10.1093/humrep/deae269 Tucker et al. 2025, Tucker 2025