assisted-reproduction/add-ons-and-adjuncts/adjunct-evidence-base therapeutics/prescribing-safety/off-label-prescribinginfertility/uterine-factor/endometrial-receptivity
Pan Z et al., 2026 · Frontiers in endocrinology
[OBJECTIVE] The role of intrauterine PRP infusion in managing recurrent implantation failure (RIF) remains controversial despite its emerging clinical use. This systematic review aims to evaluate its therapeutic potential in RIF patients and further to investigate variations in outcomes based on transfer cycle type, embryo developmental stage, RIF diagnostic criteria, and endometrial thickness. [METHODS] We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating PRP treatment for RIF patients from the beginning of the database to May 2025. [RESULTS] This meta-analysis showed that PRP administration significantly improved clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) [OR = 3.18, 95%CI (2.45, 4.14), I2 = 3%], biochemical pregnancy rate (BPR) [OR = 2.84, 95%CI (2.22, 3.63), I2 = 0%], ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) [OR = 3.41, 95%CI (2.08, 5.60), I2 = 30%] and live birth rate (LBR) [OR=5.10, 95%CI (1.95, 13.37), I2 = 75%] in women with RIF. However, PRP intrauterine infusion did not reduce miscarriage rate (MR). Notably, the preterm birth rate was significantly higher in the PRP group compared to controls [OR = 8.24, 95%CI (2.09, 32.41), I2 = 0%]. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that PRP improved CPR, BPR and LBR in both the fresh and frozen embryo transfer cycles. Additionally, while PRP increased CPR, LBR and reduced MR in blastocyst transfers [CPR OR = 3.84, 95%CI (2.82, 5.23), I2 = 0%; LBR OR = 7.32, 95%CI (3.17, 16.90), I2 = 63%; MR OR = 0.27, 95%CI (0.07, 0.96), I2 = 54%], these effects were not observed in cleavage-stage embryo transfers. Moreover, PRP administration associated with a higher CPR [OR = 3.84, 95%CI (2.82, 5.23), I2 = 0%], OPR[OR = 4.13, 95%CI (1.79, 9.56), I2 = 48%], LBR [OR = 7.32, 95%CI (3.17, 16.90), I2 = 63%] and a lower MR [OR = 0.27, 95%CI (0.07, 0.96), I2 = 54%] in women with ≥3 prior implantation failure, it did not confer the same benefit to those with a history of ≥2 failed cycles. [CONCLUSION] These findings suggest a possible beneficial role for PRP on pregnancy outcomes to some extent in women with RIF, particularly in cases with ≥3 prior failed transfers, and blastocyst transfer may increase LBR and reduce miscarriage risk. However, further investigation is warranted to determine whether this treatment may pose an increased risk of preterm birth. [SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION] https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD420251061511.
restorative-reproductive-medicine/adjunct-and-emerging-therapies/platelet-rich-plasma-and-regenerative-approaches infections-and-microbiome/chronic-endometritis/treatment-of-chronic-endometritisinfertility/uterine-factor/endometrial-receptivity
Chen X et al., 2025 · Frontiers in immunology
[BACKGROUND] Chronic endometritis (CE) has been widely recognized as a potential cause of infertility, however, access to effective treatment is a formidable challenge due to the rudimentary understanding of the pathogenesis of persistent CE. Here, we aimed to analyze the impact of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) treatment on pregnancy outcomes and the endometrial microenvironment in patients with persistent CE. [METHODS] A total of 89 infertility patients were selected, including 56 non-CE (as the control group) and 33 persistent CE. The persistent CE patients received an intrauterine infusion of PRP four times before embryo transfer. Immunohistochemistry staining and transcriptomic sequencing were used to investigate the uterine-specific role of PRP in patients with persistent CE. [RESULTS] The implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rate were significantly increased in the cured CE group compared to the non-cured CE group. After PRP treatment, the proportions of endometrial CD8+ T cells, CD56+ NK cells, Foxp3+ Treg cells, and T-bet+ Th1 cells were significantly decreased in patients with persistent CE. Specifically, DEG analysis showed that genes implicated in endometrial receptivity-related and antimicrobial were upregulated and genes involved in the immune response processes were downregulated in cured CE patients after PRP treatment. Functional enrichment analysis suggested that the effects of changes in leukocyte chemotaxis-related genes played a critical role in the endometrial immune environment. [CONCLUSIONS] Autologous PRP treatment has been shown as a potentially successful therapy for improving pregnancy outcomes by reconstructing the uterine local immune microenvironment to improve endometrial receptivity in patients with persistent CE.
assisted-reproduction/add-ons-and-adjuncts/adjunct-evidence-base reproductive-endocrinology/ovarian-hormones/estrogenrestorative-reproductive-medicine/adjunct-and-emerging-therapies/platelet-rich-plasma-and-regenerative-approaches
Nulianti R et al., 2025 · International medical case reports journal
Premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) leads to the early loss of ovarian function before age 40, resulting in infertility and hormonal imbalance. Despite the use of assisted reproductive technologies (ART), success rates remain low in this population. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy is emerging as a potential adjunct to enhance ovarian reserve. CASE ILLUSTRATIONCASE 1: A 25-year-old nulliparous woman with a history of ectopic pregnancy and an anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) level below 1 ng/mL received two PRP injections scheduled between days 7 to 12 of her cycle. After the first injection, her AMH level remained <0.5 ng/mL. Following the second PRP injection, her AMH level increased to >0.5 ng/mL. A frozen embryo transfer resulted in a successful term pregnancy and healthy newborn. CASE 2: A 36-year-old nulliparous woman, married for seven years, also presented POI and AMH levels <1 ng/mL followed the same PRP and IVF protocol. After two PRP sessions, her AMH levels improved similarly to Case 1. Despite an initial pregnancy, the patient experienced pregnancy loss. These findings suggest that PRP may improve ovarian response in women with POI undergoing IVF. Further studies are warranted.
assisted-reproduction/add-ons-and-adjuncts/adjunct-evidence-base infertility/uterine-factor/endometrial-receptivityresearch-methods/evidence-synthesis/systematic-reviews
Almohammadi A et al., 2025 · International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics
[BACKGROUND] Recurrent implantation failure (RIF) has a multifactorial etiology. An umbrella review was undertaken to evaluate the multiple proposed interventions. [OBJECTIVES] To summarize and assess the strength of evidence of interventions for RIF from published systematic reviews (SR) of randomized clinical trials (RCTs). [SEARCH STRATEGY] After prospective registration (PROSPERO CRD42023414255), a systematic search was conducted in the Cochrane Library, Scopus and Medline from inception until March 2024. [SELECTION CRITERIA] SRs of RCTs, with or without meta-analyses (MA), were included if they reported clinical pregnancy rates (CPR) or live birth rates (LBR). [DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS] The methodological quality of the included SRs was appraised independently in duplicate using the AMSTAR 2 tool. For each intervention, the MAs of RCTs with statistically significant improvements were counted as a percentage of the total assessing the strength of evidence using the GRADE system. [MAIN RESULTS] A total of 47 SRs were included: 32 reviews covered immunomodulatory interventions, 10 (68 RCTs) covered uterine and endometrial interventions, one covered antibiotics, and four (69 RCTs) addressed mixed approaches, including laboratory interventions. AMSTAR 2 appraised 41 (88%) SRs as critically low or low, and 6 (12%) as moderate or high in quality. The SRs often had a level of overlap of RCTs (median 33.3%), inconsistent definitions of RIF, and varied comparisons for the interventions. Considering the significant meta-analytic evidence of high-moderate GRADE strength: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) showed improvement in CPR in 9/13 (69.2%) MAs and LBR in 1/7 (14%); intralipid infusion showed improvement in CPR in 4/6 (57.14%) MAs and LBR in 3/4 (75%); peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) showed improvement in CPR in 4/8 (50%) MAs and LBR 3/5 (60%); platelet-rich plasma (PRP) intervention showed improvement in CPR in 6/10 (60%) MAs and LBR in 1/5 (20%); human chorionic gonadotropins showed improvement in CPR in 3/3 (100%) MAs; growth hormone showed improvement in CPR in 1/1 (100%) MA; low molecular weight heparin showed improvement in CPR in 1/1 (100%) MAs and LBR in 1/2 (50%); hysteroscopy showed improvement in CPR in 1/2 (50%) MAs; and, intentional endometrial injury showed improvement in CPR in 3/4 (75%) MAs and LBR in 2/3 (66.66%). [CONCLUSIONS] Evidence syntheses of RCTs evaluating interventions for RIF suggest a consistent direction, with high to moderate strength, indicating that immunomodulatory treatments, including G-CSF, PBMC, PRP, intralipid infusion, and intentional endometrial injury are likely to be effective. However, this conclusion should be interpreted with caution due to the generally low methodological quality of the included studies and the clinical heterogeneity observed in most SRs.