Can a panel of plasma protein biomarkers be identified to accurately and specifically diagnose endometriosis?
Summary Answer
A novel panel of 10 plasma protein biomarkers was identified and validated, demonstrating strong predictive accuracy for the diagnosis of endometriosis.
What Is Known Already
Endometriosis poses intricate medical challenges for affected individuals and their physicians, yet diagnosis currently takes an average of 7 years and normally requires invasive laparoscopy. Consequently, the need for a simple, accurate non-invasive diagnostic tool is paramount.
Study Design, Size, Duration
This study compared 805 participants across two independent clinical populations, with the status of all endometriosis and symptomatic control samples confirmed by laparoscopy. A proteomics workflow was used to identify and validate plasma protein biomarkers for the diagnosis of endometriosis.
Participants/Materials, Setting, Methods
A proteomics discovery experiment identified candidate biomarkers before a targeted mass spectrometry assay was developed and used to compare plasma samples from 464 endometriosis cases, 153 general population controls, and 132 symptomatic controls. Three multivariate models were developed: Model 1 (logistic regression) for endometriosis cases versus general population controls, Model 2 (logistic regression) for rASRM stage II to IV (mild to severe) endometriosis cases versus symptomatic controls, and Model 3 (random forest) for stage IV (severe) endometriosis cases versus symptomatic controls. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: A panel of 10 protein biomarkers were identified across the three models which added significant value to clinical factors. Model 3 (severe endometriosis vs symptomatic controls) performed the best with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.997 (95% CI 0.994-1.000). This model could also accurately distinguish symptomatic controls from early-stage endometriosis when applied to the remaining dataset (AUCs ≥0.85 for stage I to III endometriosis). Model 1 also demonstrated strong predictive performance with an AUC of 0.993 (95% CI 0.988-0.998), while Model 2 achieved an AUC of 0.729 (95% CI 0.676-0.783).
Limitations, Reasons for Caution
The study participants were mostly of European ethnicity and the results may be biased from undiagnosed endometriosis in controls. Further analysis is required to enable the generalizability of the findings to other populations and settings.
Wider Implications of the Findings
In combination, these plasma protein biomarkers and resulting diagnostic models represent a potential new tool for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): Subject recruitment at The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, was supported in part by funding from the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) project grants GNT1105321 and GNT1026033 and Australian Medical Research Future Fund grant no. MRF1199715 (P.A.W.R., S.H.-C., and M.H.). Proteomics International has filed patent WO 2021/184060 A1 that relates to endometriosis biomarkers described in this manuscript; S.B., R.L., and T.C. declare an interest in this patent. J.I., S.B., C.L., D.I., H.L., K.P., M.D., M.M., M.R., P.T., R.L., and T.C. are shareholders in Proteomics International. Otherwise, the authors have no conflicts of interest.
PMID 39719050 39719050 DOI 10.1093/humrep/deae278 10.1093/humrep/deae278 Schoeman et al. 2025, Schoeman 2025
Related articles
uterine-and-pelvic-conditions/acquired-uterine-conditions/endometrial-polypsgynecology/pelvic-pain/chronic-pelvic-painendometriosis/diagnosis/biomarkers
Open Access
Background/Objectives: Endometriosis represents substantial direct and indirect healthcare costs impacted by an absence of uniformly accurate, non-invasive diagnostic tools. We endeavored to demonstrate gastrointestinal myoelectrical activity (GIMA) biomarkers, unique to endometriosis, will allow non-invasive, uniformly accurate diagnosis or exclusion of endometriosis. Prospective open-label comparative study of 154 patients, age ≥ 18, with or without diagnosed endometriosis. Population included 62 non-endometriosis controls (Cohort 1), 43 subjects with surgically/histologically confirmed endometriosis (Cohort 2), and 49 subjects with abdominal pain and negative imaging (Cohort 3). Non-invasive electroviscerography (EVG) recorded GIMA biomarkers from three abdominal electrodes before and 30 min post water load protocol. Cohort 2 had postoperative EVG and Cohort 3 had preoperative EVG. Calculated specificity, sensitivity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and predictive probability or C-statistic used univariate, multivariate, linear, and logistical regression analyses of the area under the curve (AUC) at all frequency and time points, including age and pain covariants. The non-endometriosis cohort differed significantly from the endometriosis cohorts (p < 0.001) for median (IQR) and AUC percent frequency distribution of power at baseline, 10 min, 20 min, and 30 min post water load at all frequency ranges: 15-20 cpm, 30-40 cpm, and 40-50 cpm. The endometriosis cohorts were statistically similar (p > 0.05). GIMA biomarker threshold scoring demonstrated 95%/91% sensitivity and PPV, 96%/95% specificity and NPV, and a C-statistic of >99%/98%, respectively, for age subsets. GIMA biomarkers in Cohort 3 predicted 47/49 subjects positive and 2/49 negative for endometriosis, confirmed surgically. Hormonal therapy, surgical stage, nor pain score affected diagnostic accuracy. EVG with GIMA biomarker detection distinguished participants with and without endometriosis based upon endometriosis-specific GIMA biomarkers threshold scoring.
The discovery of a saliva-based micro–ribonucleic acid (miRNA) signature for endometriosis in 2022 opened up new perspectives for early and noninvasive diagnosis of the disease. The 109-miRNA saliva signature is the product of miRNA biomarkers and artificial intelligence (AI) modeling. We designed a multicenter study to provide external validation of its diagnostic accuracy. We present here an interim analysis. The first 200 patients included in the multicenter prospective ENDOmiRNA Saliva Test study (NCT05244668) were included for interim analysis. The study population comprised women from 18 to 43 years of age with a formal diagnosis of endometriosis or with suspected endometriosis. Epidemiologic, clinical, and saliva sequencing data were collected between November 2021 and March 2022. Genomewide miRNA expression profiling by small RNA sequencing using next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed, and a random forest algorithm was used to assess the diagnostic accuracy. In this interim analysis of the external validation cohort, with a population prevalence of 79.5%, the 109-miRNA saliva diagnostic signature for endometriosis had a sensitivity of 96.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 93.7 to 97.3%), specificity of 95.1% (95% CI, 85.2 to 99.1%), positive predictive value of 95.1% (95% CI, 85.2 to 99.1%), negative predictive value of 86.7% (95% CI, 77.6 to 90.3%), positive likelihood ratio of 19.7 (95% CI, 6.3 to 108.8), negative likelihood ratio of 0.04 (95% CI, 0.03 to 0.07), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.96 (95% CI, 0.92 to 0.98). The use of NGS and AI in the sequencing and analysis of miRNA provided a saliva-based miRNA signature for endometriosis. Our interim analysis of a prospective multicenter external validation study provides support for its ongoing investigation as a diagnostic tool. (Funded by Ziwig and the Conseil Régional d’Ile de France [Grant EX024087]; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05244668.)
Are serum vitamin D levels associated with the incidence of endometrial polyps (EPs) in infertile patients? Serum 25(OH)D levels were nonlinearly correlated with the incidence of EPs in infertile women. EPs are a common condition that may affect the receptivity of the endometrium in women of reproductive age. Vitamin D regulates cell proliferation and differentiation, apoptosis, angiogenesis, anti-inflammation, and immunomodulation, in addition to its well-known functions in balancing calcium and phosphorus. Previous studies have shown that vitamin D concentrations are associated with reproductive outcomes, and that low vitamin D levels are associated with the incidence of colorectal polyps and nasal polyps. There is little evidence regarding the relationship between EPs and serum vitamin D levels. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, We conducted a cross-sectional study using data from Guangdong Women and Children Hospital from January 2019 to October 2023, enrolling 3107 patients. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, A total of 3107 infertile patients who underwent hysteroscopy were included in this study; 642 patients had endometrial polyps and 2465 had a normal uterine cavity. Hysteroscopy findings included risk of EPs, polyp size, percentage of multiple polyps, and incidence of chronic endometritis (CE). Serum vitamin D were assessed by measuring total 25(OH)D using chemiluminescence. According to international guideline recommendations for vitamin D deficiency, patients were divided into two groups: the <50 nmol/l group and the ≥50 nmol/l group. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models, stratified analyses, and smooth curve fitting were used to examine the relationship between serum 25(OH)D levels and risk of EPs. MAIN Of all patients, 23.8% (740/3107) were vitamin D deficient (<50 nmol/l). The incidence of EPs was significantly higher in the 25(OH)D < 50 nmol/l group than in the ≥50 nmol/l group (24.9% vs 19.3%; P = 0.001). However, there were no differences in polyp size, proportion of multiple polyps, and presence of CE between the two groups. After controlling for confounders, 25(OH)D ≥ 50 nmol/l (compared with <50 nmol/l) was negatively associated with risk of EPs (adjusted OR, 0.733; 95% CI, 0.598-0.898). Other variables that had an impact on polyp incidence included BMI, type of infertility, CA125, and CD138-positive plasma cells. In addition, a linear regression model between age and serum 25(OH)D levels showed a positive linear association. Subgroup analyses were performed for different age groups, and the risk of EPs was significantly higher in the 25(OH)D < 50 nmol/l group than in the ≥50 nmol/l group, both in the younger subgroup (23.8% vs 19.1%) and in the older subgroup (28.0% vs 19.9%). The smooth curve fitting model showed a nonlinear correlation between 25(OH)D levels and risk of EPs (nonlinear P-value = 0.020), with an optimal threshold of 51.8 nmol/l for 25(OH)D levels. Moreover, subgroup smooth curve fitting models showed a nonlinear correlation between 25(OH)D levels and polyp risk in patients aged <35 years (nonlinear P-value = 0.010), whereas a linear correlation between 25(OH)D levels and polyp risk was found in patients aged ≥35 years (nonlinear P-value = 0.682). LIMITATIONS, Caution should be exercised in interpreting our findings as this is a correlational study and causality cannot be inferred from our results. In addition, because of strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, our results may not be generalizable to unselected populations, including premenopausal women or women of other races. This study demonstrated for the first time that vitamin D deficiency is an independent risk factor for the incidence of EPs in infertile patients. Identifying modifiable risk factors (e.g. vitamin D deficiency) can help in the development of new strategies for treating polyps or to protect against polyp development. Further clinical intervention trials and laboratory studies are needed to evaluate the effect of vitamin D on the development of EPs and to elucidate the mechanisms. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82101718) and Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China (2022A1515010776). No competing interest was involved in this study. N/A.
lifestyle-and-environment/nutrition-and-metabolic-health/dietary-patternsgynecology/screening-and-prevention/metabolic-and-cardiovascular-screeninguterine-and-pelvic-conditions/acquired-uterine-conditions/endometrial-polyps
Open Access
Harris HR et al., 2018·Human reproduction (Oxford, England)
Is there an association between intake of fruits and vegetables and risk of laparoscopically confirmed endometriosis? Higher intake of fruits, particularly citrus fruits, is associated with a lower risk of endometriosis. Two case-control studies have examined the associations between fruit and vegetable intake and endometriosis risk with contrasting results. Diets rich in fruits and vegetables include higher levels of pro-vitamin A nutrients (alpha-carotene, beta-carotene, beta-cryptoxanthin) and women with endometriosis have been reported to have lower intake of vitamin A than women without endometriosis. STUDY DESIGN SIZE, A prospective cohort study using data collected from 70 835 premenopausal women from 1991 to 2013 as part of the Nurses' Health Study II cohort. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, Diet was assessed with a validated food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) every 4 years. Cases were restricted to laparoscopically confirmed endometriosis. Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate rate ratios (RR) and 95% CI. MAIN During 840 012 person-years of follow-up, 2609 incident cases of laparoscopically confirmed endometriosis were reported (incidence rate = 311 per 100 000 person-years). We observed a non-linear inverse association between higher fruit consumption and risk of laparoscopically confirmed endometriosis (Psignificance of the curve = 0.005). This inverse association was particularly evident for citrus fruits. Women consuming ≥1 servings of citrus fruits/day had a 22% lower endometriosis risk (95% CI = 0.69-0.89; Ptrend = 0.004) compared to those consuming <1 serving/week. No association was observed between total vegetable intake and endometriosis risk. However, women consuming ≥1 servings/day cruciferous vegetables had a 13% higher risk of endometriosis (95% CI = 0.95-1.34; Ptrend = 0.03) compared to those consuming <1 serving/week. Of the nutrients examined, only beta-cryptoxanthin intake was significantly associated with lower endometriosis risk (RR fifth quintile = 0.88; 95% CI = 0.78-1.00; Ptrend = 0.02). LIMITATIONS Some error in the self-reporting of dietary intake is expected, however, use of a validated FFQ and examining diet prospectively across multiple time points, make it unlikely that this non-differential misclassification strongly influenced the results. Our findings suggest that a higher intake of fruits, particularly citrus fruits, is associated with a lower risk of endometriosis, and beta-cryptoxanthin in these foods may partially explain this association. In contrast to what we hypothesized, consumption of some vegetables increased endometriosis risk which may indicate a role of gastrointestinal symptoms in both the presentation and exacerbation of endometriosis-related pain; however, it is not clear what components of these foods might underlie the observed associations. Future studies examining dietary patterns that consider different combinations of food intake may help clarify these associations. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This work was supported by research grants HD4854, HD52473 and HD57210 from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, and grant P30 DK046200 from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. The Nurses' Health Study II is supported by the Public Health Service grant UM1 CA176726 from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health. HRH is supported by the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (K22 CA193860). No competing interests. n/a.