American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 164(4), 989-996, 1991
The induction of premature luteolysis in normal women--follicular phase luteinizing hormone secretion and corpus luteum function in the subsequent cycle
Women with luteal phase deficiency have been shown to have an increased frequency of luteinizing hormone pulses in the early follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. Because progesterone is known to modulate luteinizing hormone secretion, it has been hypothesized that the decreased progesterone secretion in a previous luteal phase deficiency cycle could lead to the abnormal luteinizing hormone secretory pattern in the ensuing early follicular phase. With the possibility that the higher luteinizing hormone pulse frequency might lead to another deficient luteal phase, it becomes conceivable that luteal phase deficiency could be self-perpetuating. To test this hypothesis, luteal phase deficiency was induced in six normal women by decreasing luteinizing hormone support of the corpus luteum with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist Nal-Glu, administered twice daily beginning in the midluteal phase after a control cycle. During the antagonist-treated luteal phase, each subject met the predetermined criteria for induced luteal phase deficiency: a 33% or greater decrease in integrated progesterone from the control cycle and an integrated progesterone level less than 100 ng/ml per day. Luteinizing hormone secretion patterns were determined by frequent blood sampling performed every 10 minutes for 12 hours in the early follicular phase of the control cycle and the cycle after antagonist administration. Daily luteal progesterone levels were measured in the control, treatment, and posttreatment cycles. Each volunteer served as her own control. Standard parameters were compared between the control and posttreatment pulse studies in the early follicular phase: (1) luteinizing hormone pulse frequency was 9.5 +/- 1.0 vs 10.0 +/- 0.9 pulses/12 hours, control vs posttreatment, respectively, p = 0.5; (2) luteinizing hormone pulse amplitude was 11.0 +/- 1.3 vs 12.0 +/- 2.2 ng/ml, p = 0.6; and (3) luteinizing hormone mean level was 19.4 +/- 2.3 vs 22.2 +/- 3.3 ng/ml, p = 0.1. Corpus luteum function was also compared between the control and posttreatment cycles. Luteal phase length was 13.7 +/- 0.6 vs 12.7 +/- 0.6 days, p = 0.08. Integrated progesterone values were 136.9 +/- 12.9 vs 130.5 +/- 11.3 ng/ml per day, p = 0.5. Therefore no discernible abnormalities in early follicular luteinizing hormone secretions or corpus luteum secretion of progesterone occurred after an induced luteal phase deficiency cycle.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
luteal phase deficiency self-perpetuating cycle hypothesis, premature luteolysis LH pulse frequency follicular phase, GnRH antagonist induced luteal phase defect normal women, Soules luteal phase deficiency LH secretion, corpus luteum progesterone support gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonist, LH pulse frequency early follicular phase luteal defect, Nal-Glu GnRH antagonist midluteal phase administration, progesterone modulation of LH pulsatility menstrual cycle, luteal phase deficiency subsequent cycle corpus luteum function, frequent blood sampling LH pulsatility reproductive endocrinology
PMID 2014851 2014851 DOI 10.1016/0002-9378(91)90571-8 10.1016/0002-9378(91)90571-8
Cite this article
Soules, M. R., Bremner, W. J., Dahl, K. D., Rivier, J. E., Vale, W. W., & Clifton, D. K. (1991). The induction of premature luteolysis in normal women--follicular phase luteinizing hormone secretion and corpus luteum function in the subsequent cycle. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 164(4), 989-996. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(91)90571-8
Soules MR, Bremner WJ, Dahl KD, Rivier JE, Vale WW, Clifton DK. The induction of premature luteolysis in normal women--follicular phase luteinizing hormone secretion and corpus luteum function in the subsequent cycle. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;164(4):989-996. doi:10.1016/0002-9378(91)90571-8
Soules, M. R., et al. "The induction of premature luteolysis in normal women--follicular phase luteinizing hormone secretion and corpus luteum function in the subsequent cycle." American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, vol. 164, no. 4, 1991, pp. 989-996.
To investigate whether luteal and endometrial abnormalities occur more frequently in an infertile population and thus contribute to infertility. Prospective controlled clinical study. Outpatient clinic in an academic research institution. Thirty-three fertile controls and 31 infertile women without ovulatory disorders, tubal disease, or male factors. All women underwent an endometrial biopsy 9 days after the LH surge followed by an IM injection of 5,000 IU hCG. Blood samples were drawn immediately before hCG administration for serum P and placental protein 14 (PP14) measurements, at 6 hours after hCG stimulation for serum P concentrations, and on day 5 after hCG administration for serum PP14 levels. Histologic dating of the endometrium and serum P and PP14 measurements. Abnormal endometrial biopsies occurred more frequently in infertile (43%) than in fertile women (9%). Except for one case, these specimens were not associated with low hCG-stimulated P levels. Serum PP14 measurements varied widely and did not discriminate subjects with abnormal endometrial development. Disruption of endometrial maturation without a concomitant defect of the corpus luteum occurs more frequently in an infertile population and thus may contribute to infertility.
From among a group of women with apparently normal menstrual cycles, 7 cycles with short luteal phases were identified. These cycles were characterized by grossly normal FSH and LH patterns although the FSH/LH ratio was below normal. Mean plasma progesterone increased to less than 2 ng/ml shortly after the LH peak; thus, the peak level was lower and the peak occurred earlier than in the normal cycle. Plasma 17-hydroxyprogesterone increased at the time of the LH peak although the mean peak level was only 60% that of normal cycles. There was no secondary increase of 17-hydroxyprogesterone during the luteal phase. These observations are consistent with the hypothesis that a relative deficiency of FSH during the follicular phase results in diminished follicular development and subsequent inadequate corpus luteum formation or function.
EndometriosisAMH and Ovarian ReserveSurgical Staging and TypologyAnti-Müllerian Hormone
Endometriosis is a chronic, gynecologic condition in which tissue similar to the lining of the uterus implants throughout the body. Women with endometriosis have a higher prevalence of infertility and a greater risk of early natural menopause compared to those without endometriosis. This study aimed to evaluate preoperative serum AMH levels among women with and without incident endometriosis and to assess whether levels differ by surgical staging and typology. The ENDO (Endometriosis: Natural History, Diagnosis, and Outcomes) study was conducted between 2007 and 2009. The ENDO study consisted of an operative and population cohort (n=600). Only those in the ENDO operative cohort from the Utah site were used for this analysis, and included women aged 18 to 44 years who were scheduled for gynecologic surgery, irrespective of clinical indication (n=476). AMH levels were measured from stored serum collected before surgery using a quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. After excluding participants with missing outcome data (n=51), unilateral oophorectomy (n=8), or those within the population cohort (n=69), 348 participants remained for the analysis. Surgically confirmed endometriosis diagnosis, staging (American Society for Reproductive Medicine I-IV), and typology (superficial, deep, ovarian) were ascertained by the operative report. Outliers for AMH (>14.0 ng/mL) were excluded from the analyses and AMH values were log-transformed. Multivariable linear regression models adjusted for age (squared and continuous), body mass index, serum cotinine levels, and exogenous hormonal contraceptive use were conducted. Percentage differences in AMH were calculated as (exp[β]-1)×100, and 95% confidence intervals were reported. Compared with no endometriosis, incident endometriosis diagnosis was associated with lower AMH levels (-19.8%; 95% confidence interval, -37.0 to 1.0); however, this association was not statistically significant. Stage III to IV disease was associated with 40.1% lower AMH levels (95% confidence interval, -58.9 to -12.7). Ovarian endometriomas were most strongly associated with lower AMH levels (-54.3%; 95% confidence interval, -69.4 to -31.8), with a more pronounced association among those with infertility (-72.6%; 95% confidence interval, -85.4 to -48.5). Deep (-24.1%; 95% confidence interval, -48.2 to 11.0) and superficial (-15.5%; 95% confidence interval, -34.6 to 9.3) endometriosis also showed a trend toward lower AMH levels, but these findings were not statistically significant. Compared with a postoperative diagnosis of a normal pelvis, incident endometriosis was associated with 26.8% lower AMH levels (95% confidence interval, -44.6 to -3.4). Stage III to IV disease was associated with 47.8% lower AMH levels (95% confidence interval, -65.8 to -23.2), and all subtypes of endometriosis were statistically significantly associated with lower levels of AMH compared with a postoperative diagnosis of a normal pelvis (ovarian: -60.8%; 95% confidence interval, -74.4 to -39.9; -34.3%; 95% confidence interval, -56.2 to -1.4; -24.8%; 95% confidence interval, -43.9 to -0.8). Ovarian and moderate to severe (stage III-IV) endometriosis were associated with markedly lower AMH levels compared with no endometriosis. Compared with a postoperative diagnosis of a normal pelvis, incident endometriosis and moderate to severe stages (stage III-IV) were associated with statistically significantly lower AMH levels. Additionally, typology (deep, ovarian, or superficial) was associated with statistically significantly lower AMH levels. However, this association was likely driven by the presence of ovarian endometriomas across all subtypes. These findings are consistent with previous studies and demonstrate that endometriosis lesions themselves, independent of surgical intervention, influence AMH levels.
General OB/GYNUterine Closure TechniqueHysterotomy RepairCesarean Scar Complications
Bujold E et al., 2026·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Normal uterine function depends on cyclical regeneration and the capacity to sustain pregnancy. A cesarean incision represents an injury to this remarkable organ. Although the uterus possesses exceptional healing potential, cesarean delivery increases the risk of secondary infertility, pelvic pain, uterine rupture, and abnormal placentation in subsequent pregnancies. The two most important determinants of successful hysterotomy healing after cesarean delivery are the location of the incision and the surgical technique used for closure. The anatomic site of entry-whether the corpus, lower uterine segment, or cervix-defines the tissue composition, vascularity, and contractility at the wound margins, which in turn influence how the scar remodels and withstands subsequent pregnancies. Surgical technique is also important. A robust body of experimental and clinical evidence demonstrates that restoring anatomic integrity by reapproximating uterine layers while excluding the endometrium produces stronger scars and reduces late complications. The rationale for excluding the endometrium is to prevent displacement of endometrial tissue into the myometrium and to avoid mucosal tearing against a foreign body (i.e. suture material), both of which predispose to defective healing. When the endometrium is incorporated, healing is often impaired, leading to niches or isthmoceles, adenomyosis, and endometriosis at the scar site. Over time, these defects have been recognized as contributors to abnormal bleeding, pelvic pain, infertility, uterine rupture, and placenta accreta spectrum disorders. Despite this evidence, single-layer closures that incorporate endometrium became widely adopted because of their speed and simplicity, while their long-term sequels were initially underappreciated. This has prompted renewed scrutiny of closure techniques, including comparisons of single-layer vs double-layer closure, locking vs nonlocking sutures, type of sutures, and the direction of suture. Collectively, the data show that optimal closure respects uterine anatomy, restores the natural alignment of tissues, and achieves hemostasis without compromising perfusion or strangulating tissues. Building on these principles, we herein describe a refined 3-layer closure. The first layer approximates decidua and junctional myometrium while excluding surface endometrium to prevent tissue entrapment and bacterial contamination. The second layer restores anatomic wall integrity by reapproximating the bulk of the myometrium, thereby reinforcing strength and distributing tension across the scar. The third layer reapproximates superficial myometrium and serosa, smoothing the uterine surface and reducing adhesions. This technique is not simply a return to traditional double-layer methods or an extension of single-layer practice, but rather a refinement that integrates lessons from visceral surgery and contemporary obstetric data. Its rationale is to restore anatomy, secure hemostasis without ischemia, and preserve long-term uterine function. While short-term safety appears comparable across closure methods, evidence increasingly indicates that long-term reproductive outcomes depend on how closure respects tissue biology. We argue that appropriate repair is more meticulous restoration of uterine anatomy should take precedence over operative speed. The enduring success of a hysterotomy repair depends on the surgical technique employed, as it directly affects women's future reproductive health.