Urinary follicle stimulating hormone treatment for luteal phase defect

Diagnosis and treatment of luteal phase deficiency: a Committee Opinion

Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and Practice Committee of the Society for Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, 2026 · Fertility and sterility

Luteal phase deficiency (LPD) is a clinical diagnosis associated with abnormal luteal phase length of ≤10 days. Potential etiologies of LPD include inadequate progesterone duration, inadequate progesterone levels, or endometrial progesterone resistance. Luteal phase deficiency has been described in association with medical conditions, but also in fertile, normally menstruating women. Although progesterone is important for the process of implantation and early embryonic development, LPD has not been proven to be an independent entity causing infertility or recurrent pregnancy loss. Controversy exists regarding the multiple proposed measures for diagnosing LPD, and assuming it can be diagnosed accurately, whether treatment improves outcomes. This document replaces the document of the same name, last published in 2021 (Fertil Steril 2021;115(6):1416-23).

The corpus luteum insufficiency: a multifactorial disease

Hinney B et al., 1996 · J Clin Endocrinol Metab ·

The pulsatile release pattern of LH during the entire menstrual cycle is well defined; however, the response of corpora lutea to these LH pulses in patients suffering from corpus luteum insufficiencies (CLI) is largely unknown. Patients suffering from CLI were selected from infertile patients on the basis of low progesterone (P < 25 nmol/L) in a blood sample withdrawn during a monitoring cycle. During the next cycle, nine blood samples were collected during the follicular and luteal phase and follicular development was assessed by vaginal sonography. Of 109 patients who had a CLI in the monitoring cycle, 55 had a CLI again, and 38 women agreed to undergo assessment of pulsatile hormone secretion. These women again had P < 25 nmol/L at days 6 and 7 of the luteal phase and blood samples were withdrawn through antecubital vein catheters from 0900-1700 h at 10-min intervals on days 7, 8, or 9 following ovulation. From 38 patients with such defined CLI, 16 (42%) had no LH episode and significantly lower basal LH levels in comparison with 14 control subjects. Thirteen (34%) of the patients had normal appearing LH episodes despite too low P and E2 concentrations, but their CL did not react to the LH episodes. The remaining 9 patients (24%) had normal LH episodes; their CL reacted to these episodes, but their basal P levels were too low. In all blood samples LH was not only determined using an immunoassay but also by the mouse Leydig cell testosterone production bioassay. It could be established that no CLI exists, which is due to the release of bioinactive LH. It is anticipated that the differentiation of three different types of CLI, one of hypothalamic and two of ovarian origin, may allow the development of differential diagnostic and therapeutic tools in the future.

The induction of premature luteolysis in normal women--follicular phase luteinizing hormone secretion and corpus luteum function in the subsequent cycle

Soules MR et al., 1991 · Am J Obstet Gynecol ·

Women with luteal phase deficiency have been shown to have an increased frequency of luteinizing hormone pulses in the early follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. Because progesterone is known to modulate luteinizing hormone secretion, it has been hypothesized that the decreased progesterone secretion in a previous luteal phase deficiency cycle could lead to the abnormal luteinizing hormone secretory pattern in the ensuing early follicular phase. With the possibility that the higher luteinizing hormone pulse frequency might lead to another deficient luteal phase, it becomes conceivable that luteal phase deficiency could be self-perpetuating. To test this hypothesis, luteal phase deficiency was induced in six normal women by decreasing luteinizing hormone support of the corpus luteum with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist Nal-Glu, administered twice daily beginning in the midluteal phase after a control cycle. During the antagonist-treated luteal phase, each subject met the predetermined criteria for induced luteal phase deficiency: a 33% or greater decrease in integrated progesterone from the control cycle and an integrated progesterone level less than 100 ng/ml per day. Luteinizing hormone secretion patterns were determined by frequent blood sampling performed every 10 minutes for 12 hours in the early follicular phase of the control cycle and the cycle after antagonist administration. Daily luteal progesterone levels were measured in the control, treatment, and posttreatment cycles. Each volunteer served as her own control. Standard parameters were compared between the control and posttreatment pulse studies in the early follicular phase: (1) luteinizing hormone pulse frequency was 9.5 +/- 1.0 vs 10.0 +/- 0.9 pulses/12 hours, control vs posttreatment, respectively, p = 0.5; (2) luteinizing hormone pulse amplitude was 11.0 +/- 1.3 vs 12.0 +/- 2.2 ng/ml, p = 0.6; and (3) luteinizing hormone mean level was 19.4 +/- 2.3 vs 22.2 +/- 3.3 ng/ml, p = 0.1. Corpus luteum function was also compared between the control and posttreatment cycles. Luteal phase length was 13.7 +/- 0.6 vs 12.7 +/- 0.6 days, p = 0.08. Integrated progesterone values were 136.9 +/- 12.9 vs 130.5 +/- 11.3 ng/ml per day, p = 0.5. Therefore no discernible abnormalities in early follicular luteinizing hormone secretions or corpus luteum secretion of progesterone occurred after an induced luteal phase deficiency cycle.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Tamoxifen in the treatment of infertile patients associated with inadequate luteal phase

Tajima C, 1984 · Fertil Steril ·