Safety and Risks · Birth Defects
Davies MJ et al., 2012 · The New England journal of medicine
The extent to which birth defects after infertility treatment may be explained by underlying parental factors is uncertain. We linked a census of treatment with assisted reproductive technology in South Australia to a registry of births and terminations with a gestation period of at least 20 weeks or a birth weight of at least 400 g and registries of birth defects (including cerebral palsy and terminations for defects at any gestational period). We compared risks of birth defects (diagnosed before a child's fifth birthday) among pregnancies in women who received treatment with assisted reproductive technology, spontaneous pregnancies (i.e., without assisted conception) in women who had a previous birth with assisted conception, pregnancies in women with a record of infertility but no treatment with assisted reproductive technology, and pregnancies in women with no record of infertility. Of the 308,974 births, 6163 resulted from assisted conception. The unadjusted odds ratio for any birth defect in pregnancies involving assisted conception (513 defects, 8.3%) as compared with pregnancies not involving assisted conception (17,546 defects, 5.8%) was 1.47 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33 to 1.62); the multivariate-adjusted odds ratio was 1.28 (95% CI, 1.16 to 1.41). The corresponding odds ratios with in vitro fertilization (IVF) (165 birth defects, 7.2%) were 1.26 (95% CI, 1.07 to 1.48) and 1.07 (95% CI, 0.90 to 1.26), and the odds ratios with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) (139 defects, 9.9%) were 1.77 (95% CI, 1.47 to 2.12) and 1.57 (95% CI, 1.30 to 1.90). A history of infertility, either with or without assisted conception, was also significantly associated with birth defects. The increased risk of birth defects associated with IVF was no longer significant after adjustment for parental factors. The risk of birth defects associated with ICSI remained increased after multivariate adjustment, although the possibility of residual confounding cannot be excluded. (Funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council and the Australian Research Council.).
Safety and Risks · Birth Defects
Henningsen AA et al., 2023 · Fertility and sterility
To investigate whether the risk of major congenital malformations is higher in live-born singletons conceived with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) compared with in vitro fertilization (IVF)? Nordic register-based cohort study. Cross-linked data from Medical Birth Registers and National ART and Patient Registers in Denmark, Norway and Sweden. Data were included from the year the first child conceived using ICSI was born: Sweden, 1992; Denmark, 1994; and Norway, 1996. Data were included until 2014 for Denmark and 2015 for Norway and Sweden. All live-born singletons conceived using fresh ICSI (n = 32,484); fresh IVF (n = 47,178); without medical assistance (n = 4,804,844); and cryo-ICSI (n = 7,200) during the study period. Different in vitro conception methods, and cryopreservation of embryos. Risk of major congenital malformations on the basis of International Classification of Diseases codes. The European Concerted Action on Congenital Anomalies and Twins was used to differentiate between major and minor malformations. Among singletons conceived using fresh ICSI, 6.0% had a major malformation, compared with 5.3% of children conceived using fresh IVF; 4.2% of children conceived without medical assistance; and 4.9% of children conceived using cryo-ICSI; adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.07 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.14) in ICSI vs. IVF; and AOR 1.28 (95% CI, 1.23-1.35) in ICSI vs. no medical assistance; and AOR 1.11 (95% CI, 0.99-1.26) in ICSI fresh vs. cryo-ICSI. When malformations were grouped by different organ systems, children conceived using ICSI had a higher risk of respiratory and chromosomal malformations compared with children conceived using IVF, but there were very few cases in each group. When categorizing children conceived using ICSI according to treatment indication (male factor infertility only vs. other indications), we found a higher risk of hypospadias when ICSI was performed because of male factor infertility only (AOR 1.85 [95% CI 1.03-332]). The indications for ICSI changed over time, as male factor infertility did not remain the primary indication for ICSI throughout the study period. In this large cohort study, we found the risk of major malformations in live-born singletons to be slightly higher after fresh ICSI compared with fresh IVF. These findings should be considered when choosing the assisted reproductive technology method for couples without male factor infertility.
Safety and Risks · Birth Defects
Sagot P et al., 2012 · Human reproduction (Oxford, England)
While intrauterine insemination (IUI), a simple, inexpensive and non-invasive technique, is the most used assisted reproduction technology (ART) worldwide, the risk of major birth defects following IUI is paradoxically not well documented. Retrospective cohort study performed in Burgundy, France, over a 9-year period which consisted of the cross analysis of two prospective databases, the Burgundy perinatal network database and the database of the assisted conception units in Burgundy. A total of 1348 ART singletons [in vitro fertilization technologies (IVFT): n= 903; n= 445] matched with 4044 infants conceived naturally, 552 ART twins (IVFT: n= 362; n= 190) matched with 1656 twins who were conceived naturally. The major birth defects were categorized according to the European Surveillance of Congenital Anomalies classification EUROCAT. Compared with naturally conceived singletons, singletons born after IUI and IVFT had a higher prevalence of major congenital malformations, with adjusted odd ratios (AOR) of 2.0 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0-3.8] and 2.0 (CI 1.3-3.1); 3.6 and 4.2% of infants born, respectively. All twins and unlike-sex twins born after IVFT but not IUI, have an increased prevalence of major birth defects compared with naturally conceived twins; AOR of 3.0 (CI 1.6-5.6) and 3.7 (CI 1.1-16.9), respectively. When comparing IUI with IVFT, no differences were observed for singletons (AOR 1.0; CI 0.4-2.2), all twins (AOR 0.4; CI 0.1-1.2) and unlike-sex twins (AOR 0.3; CI 0.1-4.5). The risk of major birth defects in singletons conceived through IUI was increased over naturally conceived singletons. This risk was no different from that observed after IVFT.
Safety and Risks · Birth Defects
Yin L et al., 2013 · Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology
Previous studies inconsistently suggest that assisted reproduction technology (ART) may increase the risk of birth defects in children. METHOD(S): Live birth infants, conceived by in vitro fertilization fresh embryo transfer (IVF), intracytoplasmic sperm injection fresh embryo transfer (ICSI), or frozen‐thawed embryo transfer (FET) in Reproductive Center of Tongji Hospital (Wuhan, China) between 1997 and 2008, were followed up at birth and after 3 years. Preterm pregnancy, multiple pregnancy, sex ratio (male/female), congenital malformation were compared. RESULT(S): A total of 4,236 children were born after ART (IVF 2,543, ICSI 908, FET 785). Compared with IVF, the rate of preterm pregnancy and sex ratio in ICSI were lower (p < 0.05); the rate of multiple pregnancy in ICSI and FET were all lower than IVF (p < 0.05). Congenital defects were comparable in all groups at birth. In total, 2,908 children participated in the second follow‐up from 34 months to 60 months with an average of 40 months, and the cases of birth defects had doubled (3 years: 5.16%, birth: 2.22%). The birth defect rate in boys conceived through ICSI was significantly higher than the IVF group after 3‐year follow‐up (ICSI boys: 8.62%, IVF boys: 5.21% [p < 0.05]), even though there was no significant difference at birth. CONCLUSION(S): Compared with IVF, FET may not increase risk of birth defects. Children conceived through ICSI, especially males, had higher rates of congenital malformations that were inapparent at birth. So longitudinal monitoring may provide insights into the risks of ART. Birth Defects Research (Part A) 97:744–749, 2013. 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
