Twenty-four-hour progesterone and luteinizing hormone profiles in the midluteal phase of the infertile patient: correlation with other indicators of luteal phase insufficiency
The authors have further analyzed women diagnosed as having luteal phase insufficiency in hope of determining the value of specific screening tests as well as determining the degree of heterogeneity of pathophysiologic mechanisms involved in the disorder. Twelve women with the disorder were identified, 6 with two consecutive midluteal serum progesterone (P) levels less than 10 ng/ml (group 1) and 6 with two consecutive late luteal phase endometrial biopsies out of phase (group 2); 4 infertile women with normal serum P and late luteal biopsies also were studied (group 3). All underwent serum sampling for P and luteinizing hormone (LH) at 20-minute intervals for 24 hours, beginning at 9:00 A.M. of day 7 post-LH surge. No significant differences were noted among the three groups for LH area under the curve, pulse frequency, or pulse amplitude. Furthermore, no differences were ascertained for P area under the curve. However, individuals were identified who had one or more hormonal abnormalities but no abnormal biopsy, as well as patients with normal hormonal profiles but having abnormal endometrial development. Receiver Operating Characteristic curves demonstrated that pooled morning serum P levels provided optimal predictive ability of biopsy results. The authors conclude that luteal phase insufficiency is a heterogeneous disorder, and that neither endometrial biopsy nor serum hormonal analysis obviates the need for the other.
PMID 2924929 2924929 DOI 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60604-0 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60604-0 Olive et al. 1989, Olive 1989
Cite this article
Olive, D. L., Thomford, P. J., Torres, S. E., Lambert, T. S., & Rosen, G. F. (1989). Twenty-four-hour progesterone and luteinizing hormone profiles in the midluteal phase of the infertile patient: correlation with other indicators of luteal phase insufficiency. Fertility and sterility, 51(4), 587-592. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60604-0
Olive DL, Thomford PJ, Torres SE, Lambert TS, Rosen GF. Twenty-four-hour progesterone and luteinizing hormone profiles in the midluteal phase of the infertile patient: correlation with other indicators of luteal phase insufficiency. Fertil Steril. 1989;51(4):587-592. doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60604-0
Olive, D. L., et al. "Twenty-four-hour progesterone and luteinizing hormone profiles in the midluteal phase of the infertile patient: correlation with other indicators of luteal phase insufficiency." Fertility and sterility, vol. 51, no. 4, 1989, pp. 587-592.
To assess the sensitivity and specificity of common clinical tests used for the diagnosis of luteal phase defect (LPD). The sensitivity and specificity of these tests for predicting low integrated P levels over the luteal phase were calculated. Outpatient reproductive endocrinology and infertility clinic at a university medical center. Fifty-eight strictly defined normal women were used to determine normal integrated luteal phase P levels. The study population was a separate 34 women who either were normal (n = 15) or were being evaluated for infertility or recurrent abortion (n = 19). These 34 study subjects all had the following tests performed in the same menstrual cycle: daily reproductive hormone levels, daily assessment of preovulatory follicle size, late luteal endometrial biopsies, and BBT charts. Basal body temperature, maximum preovulatory follicle size, dated endometrial biopsies, and serum P levels (single and multiple) were used in an attempt to predict which patients had low integrated P levels. Unacceptably low sensitivity and/or specificity levels were found for the following tests: appearance of BBT charts, luteal phase length, and preovulatory follicle diameter. Timed endometrial biopsy was found to have marginally acceptable sensitivity and specificity levels whether dated by next menstrual period or midcycle events. The best test for the prediction of low integrated P was a single serum P level from the midluteal phase that was < 10 ng/mL (31.8 nmol/L) or a sum of three random serum P measurements that was < 30 ng/mL (95.4 nmol/L) (also obtained in the midluteal phase). Luteal phase defect is a relatively uncommon but important cause of infertility and/or habitual abortion. The recommended test for the determination of LPD is a midluteal phase single serum P level < 10 ng/mL or the sum of three serum P levels that is < 30 ng/mL. The endometrial biopsy is a second line test that is only recommended when LPD needs to be evaluated in a treated cycle (ovulation induction or supplemental P).
Luteal phase deficiency is an ovulatory dysfunction problem that is subtle but real. It may be the most common ovulatory problem in women. Luteal phase deficiency has been clearly demonstrated in the research setting (1) in spontaneous cycles, (2) when follicular maturation has been impeded, and (3) when luteotrophic influences have been suppressed. The diagnosis of LPD in the clinical setting remains problematic and controversial primarily because there is no practical diagnostic method that has been validated. This article has reviewed the methods that have been used to diagnose LPD. BBT charts are insensitive; these charts reliably diagnose LPD only when there are persistent short luteal phases. There is disagreement whether ovarian follicular size, as determined by ultrasonography, is decreased in LPD; however, ultrasonographic diagnosis of LPD would require daily scans through ovulation, which makes this approach impractical. Mild hyperprolactinemia is a probable cause of LPD in a minority of patients; a physician should obtain a PRL level in LPD women with the realization that there is considerable sampling variability. Determination of serum gonadotropin levels (LH or FSH or both) is not practical for the clinical diagnosis of LPD. Random serum P levels, whether single or multiple, are not helpful in the diagnosis of LPD in individual patients. The secretory pattern of P results in such wide confidence limits that P samples from individuals cannot be compared to normal in a useful manner. Most of the controversy about the diagnosis of LPD has centered around the use of individual serum P levels. The timed endometrial biopsy relies on the endometrium as a bioassay of P over time. The endometrial biopsy has not been carefully validated in terms of its sensitivity or accuracy for the diagnosis of LPD. However, it remains the best current method for the diagnosis of LPD when the standard guidelines for its use are followed. As opposed to the other tests for LPD, awareness of the usefulness of the biopsy has increased as we have learned more about CL physiology. No current research method for the diagnosis of LPD appears to be a practical method that could be applied in the clinical setting. Specific secretory proteins from the endometrium and methods to measure hormone secretion that circumvent the secretory pattern hold promise for improved methods to diagnose LPD in the future.
Thirteen women with luteal phase defects (LPD) confirmed by endometrial biopsies and 14 with histologically normal endometria were studied for early follicular and midfollicular phase follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) levels and for midluteal phase progesterone, estrogen, testosterone, and prolactin levels. The results showed that the women with LPD had significantly lower FSH levels and FSH/LH ratios in the early and midfollicular phases. LH levels, however, were similar in the LPD and normal women. During the midluteal phase, the LPD women showed significantly lower levels of progesterone and estrogen and normal levels of testosterone and prolactin. These findings reaffirm the prevailing concept that events surrounding follicular growth and development can indeed influence the quality of that cycle's corpus luteum. Furthermore, LPD as a result of hyperprolactinemia appears to be a different entity from that due to inadequate follicular phase FSH.
Many studies have been published on luteal phase deficiency, and the emphasis in most of them is on progesterone deficiency. In this study 144 patients (455 cycles) with infertility were studied. The patients were divided into four groups. Group 1 consisted of patients with high estradiol and high progesterone levels in the midluteal phase. Group 2 consisted of patients with high estradiol and low progesterone levels. Group 3 consisted of patients with low estradiol and low progesterone levels. Group 4 consisted of patients with low estradiol and high progesterone levels. As expected, patients in groups 2 and 3 showed a low conception rate with outphased endometrial biopsy. However, group 4, in spite of the normal progesterone levels, had a low conception rate with an outphased endometrium. We conclude that estradiol deficiency during the luteal phase is a major factor in infertility, and replacement therapy with progesterone alone in these patients may not improve fertility.