To assess whether paternal health is associated with maternal peripartum and neonatal outcomes.
Design
Retrospective cohort study.
Setting
University research departments.
PATIENT(S): Analytic sample of children born to paired fathers and mothers covering live births within the United States between 2009-2016.
INTERVENTION(S): Paternal health status (e.g., metabolic syndrome diagnoses, individual chronic disease diagnoses).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Primary outcome of preterm birth (i.e., live birth before 37 weeks), and secondary outcomes of low birth weight, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) stay, gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, eclampsia, and length of maternal stay.
RESULT(S): The IBM Marketscan Research database covers reimbursed health care claims data on inpatient and outpatient encounters who are privately insured through employment-sponsored health insurance. We assessed 785,809 singleton live births, with 6.6% born preterm. The presence of paternal comorbidities was associated with higher odds of preterm birth, low birth weight (LBW), and NICU stay. After adjusting for maternal factors, fathers with most or all components of the metabolic syndrome had 19% higher odds of having a child born preterm (95% CI 1.11-1.28), 23% higher odds of LBW (95% CI 1.01-1.51), and 28% higher odds of NICU stay (95% CI 1.08-1.52). Maternal morbidity (e.g., gestational diabetes or preeclampsia) was also positively associated with preconception paternal health.
CONCLUSION(S): Increased preconception paternal comorbidity may be associated with negative infant and maternal outcomes. Although the paternal effect remains modest, these findings highlight the importance of the health of both parents, particularly the mother, on healthy pregnancy.
PMID 32147174 32147174 DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.12.026 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.12.026 Kasman et al. 2020, Kasman 2020
Cite this article
Kasman, A. M., Zhang, C. A., Li, S., Stevenson, D. K., Shaw, G. M., & Eisenberg, M. L. (2020). Association of preconception paternal health on perinatal outcomes: analysis of U.S. claims data.. Fertility and sterility, 113(5), 947-954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.12.026
Kasman AM, Zhang CA, Li S, Stevenson DK, Shaw GM, Eisenberg ML. Association of preconception paternal health on perinatal outcomes: analysis of U.S. claims data.. Fertility and sterility. 2020;113(5):947-954. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.12.026
Schisterman EF et al., 2013·Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol·
Open Access
Low-dose aspirin (LDA) has been proposed to improve pregnancy outcomes in couples experiencing recurrent pregnancy loss. However, results from studies of LDA on pregnancy outcomes have been inconsistent, perhaps because most studies evaluated LDA-initiated post-conception. The purpose of the Effects of Aspirin in Gestation and Reproduction (EAGeR) trial was to determine whether preconception-initiated LDA improves livebirth rates in women with one to two prior losses. We performed a multicentre, block randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Study participants were recruited using community-based advertisements and physician referral to four university medical centres in the US (2006-12). Eligible women were aged 18-40 years actively trying to conceive, with one to two prior losses. Participants were randomised to receive daily LDA (81 mg/day) or a matching placebo, and all were provided with daily 400-mcg folic acid. Follow-up continued for ≤6 menstrual cycles while attempting to conceive. For those who conceived, treatment was continued until 36 weeks gestation. The primary outcome was the cumulative livebirth rate over the trial period. There were 1228 women randomised (615 LDA, 613 placebo). Participants had a mean age of 28.7, were mostly white (95%), well educated (86% more than high school education), and employed (75%) with a household income >$100 000 annually (40%). The characteristics of those in the treatment and placebo arms were well balanced. We describe the study design, recruitment, data collection, and baseline characteristics of participants enrolled in EAGeR, which aimed to determine the effect of LDA on livebirth and other pregnancy outcomes in these women.
Solmonovich R et al., 2025·Fertility and sterility
To determine whether an association exists between in vitro fertilization (IVF) and severe maternal morbidity among low-risk pregnant patients. Retrospective cohort study. Low-risk pregnant patients who delivered between January 2019 and December 2022. Low-risk was defined as having an obstetric comorbidity index score of 0. In vitro fertilization. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary outcome (dependent variable) was any severe maternal morbidity. The secondary outcome was the need for a cesarean delivery. A modified Poisson regression with robust error variance was used to model the probability of severe maternal morbidity as a function of IVF. Risk ratios and their associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed. An α value of 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULT(S): A total of 39,668 pregnancies were included for analysis, and 454 (1.1%) were conceived by IVF. The overall severe maternal morbidity rate was 2.4% (n = 949), with the most common indicator being blood transfusion. The overall cesarean delivery rate was 18.8% (n = 7,459). On modified Poisson regression, IVF-conceived pregnancies were associated with 2.56 times the risk of severe maternal morbidity (95% CI, 1.73-3.79) and 1.54 times the risk of having a cesarean delivery (95% CI, 1.37-1.74) compared with non-IVF pregnancies. CONCLUSION(S): In vitro fertilization is associated with higher rates of severe maternal morbidity, primarily the need for a blood transfusion, and cesarean delivery in low-risk pregnancies without major comorbidities. Recognizing this association allows healthcare providers to implement proactive measures for better monitoring and tailored postpartum care.
The evidence on the association between diet and miscarriage risk is scant and conflicting. To summarize the evidence on the association between periconceptual diet and miscarriage risk in healthy women of reproductive age. Data Sources: Electronic databases were searched from inception to August 2022 without restriction of regions, publication types, or languages. Experimental or observational studies were considered for inclusion. The population was healthy women of reproductive age. Exposure was periconception diet. Study quality was assessed using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Summary effect sizes (odds ratio [OR] with 95% confidence interval [CI]) were calculated for each food category. Outcomes: Miscarriage rate (as defined by primary studies). We included 20 studies (11 cohort and 9 case-control), of which 6 presented data suitable for meta-analysis (2 cohort and 4 case-control, n = 13,183 women). Our primary analyses suggest a reduction in miscarriage odds with high intake of the following food groups: fruit (OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.33-0.46), vegetables (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.46-0.76), fruit and vegetables (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.50-0.81), seafood (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.71-0.92), dairy products (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.54-0.73), eggs (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.72-0.90), and cereal (grains) (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.52-0.87). The evidence was uncertain for meat, red meat, white meat, fat and oil, and sugar substitutes. We did not find evidence of an association between adherence to predefined dietary patterns and miscarriage risk. However, a whole diet containing healthy foods as perceived by the trialists, or with a high Dietary Antioxidant Index score (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.20-0.91) may be associated with a reduction in miscarriage risk. In contrast, a diet rich in processed food was demonstrated to be associated with increased miscarriage risk (OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.36-3.34). A diet abundant in fruit, vegetables, seafood, dairy, eggs, and grain may be associated with lower miscarriage odds. Further interventional studies are required to accurately assess the effectiveness of periconception dietary modifications on miscarriage risk. PROSPERO Registration: CRD42020218133.
Mattsson K et al., 2021·Fertility and sterility·
Open Access
To study childbirth and the risk of miscarriage and infertility among women who have received a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes before the start of their reproductive journey. Register-based cohort study using the Skåne Healthcare Register All healthcare visits for the whole population of the southernmost region in Sweden over the past 20 years PATIENT(S): All women who were aged 18-45 years between January 1, 1998 and December 31, 2019 and who received a clinical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes before their first childbirth, miscarriage, or infertility diagnosis (n = 230) were compared with a healthcare-seeking population of women without any type of diabetes, matched for calendar year and age (n = 179,434). INTERVENTION(S): None MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Childbirth, miscarriage, and infertility diagnosis RESULT(S): The birthrate was lower among women with type 2 diabetes (62.6% vs. 83.8%), and they were less likely to give birth (crude risk ratio [RR] = 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.66-0.81). They had a higher risk of experiencing a miscarriage (RR = 1.88, 95% CI: 1.50-2.36). The risk of infertility was increased (RR = 3.44, 95% CI: 2.88-4.10) as was the risk of having infertility and not giving birth (RR = 4.47, 95% CI: 3.44-5.82). All results remained the same after adjustment for polycystic ovary syndrome and obesity. CONCLUSION(S): Women with type 2 diabetes with onset before their reproductive journey were more often childless compared with women without diabetes and had a higher risk of experiencing both miscarriage and infertility. This patient group may be in need of targeted information regarding potential fertility issues as part of their clinical treatment.