Dalton, K. (1962). Controlled trials in the prophylactic value of progesterone in the treatment of pre-eclamptic toxaemia. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the British Empire, 69, 463-468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1962.tb01176.x
Dalton K. Controlled trials in the prophylactic value of progesterone in the treatment of pre-eclamptic toxaemia. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp. 1962;69:463-468. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1962.tb01176.x
Dalton, K. "Controlled trials in the prophylactic value of progesterone in the treatment of pre-eclamptic toxaemia." The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the British Empire, vol. 69, 1962, pp. 463-468.
For EndNote, Zotero or Mendeley:
License
No open license is recorded for this paper. Reuse terms are set by the publisher.
Children whose mothers received prenatal progesterone have been shown to be advanced in development at one year and to have greater academic achievement at 9-10 years. This study compares the educational attainments at 17-20 years of 34 progesterone children with 37 normal and 12 toxaemic controls. More progesterone children continued schooling after 16 years compared with controls; a higher proportion left school with 'O' level and 'A' level passes, the average number of passes per child was greater at both levels and more obtained a university place. The best academic results were in those whose mothers had received over 5 grams of prenatal progesterone, and for whom administration commenced before the sixteenth week and treatment lasted longer than eight weeks.
Dalton K, 1957·Br Med J·Free full text on PubMed Central
While investigating the use of progesterone for the relief of premenstrual syndrome (Greene and Dalton, 1953) a high incidence of toxaemia of pregnancy (19.1 %) was recognized among sufferers from this syndrome. A further investigation, undertaken to ascertain the incidence of premenstrual syndrome in those who had previously suffered from toxemia of pregnancy, revealed that 86% of the 237 women thus affected at one time or another during the previous twelve years also suffered from premenstrual syndrome (Dalton, 1954). Furthermore, direct questioning and a scrutiny of records of these patients showed that before the full development of the signs of toxaemia–that is, oedema, hypertension, and albuminuria–most had earlier in the pregnancy experienced a symptomatic stage characterized by relatively minor afflictions–for example, lethargy 43 %, headache 48%, visual aura 37%, vertigo 29%, nausea and vomiting 16%, irritability 14%, depression 9%, and backache 6%. In fact, only 7% disclosed freedom from these symptoms during a toxaemic pregnancy. Of the 237 women, 92 (38.8%) had experienced both a normal and a toxaemic pregnancy, and 72 (78 %) contrasted the sense of well-being associated with a normal pregnancy with the malaise and minor symptoms characteristic of the toxaemic condition. The striking feature of these early minor symptoms of toxaemia was their close resemblance to those of premenstrual syndrome noted in an earlier investigation (Greene and Dalton, 1953), most patients confirming that the minor symptoms during their toxaemic pregnancy were similar, though of increased severity, to those experienced in the premenstruum, irrespective of whether the onset of premenstrual syndrome had preceded or followed the toxaemic pregnancy. Apart from the similarities of these minor symptoms in the two conditions, other points in common were noted. For example, day-to-day observations of sufferers of premenstrual syndrome had shown that, apart from minor symptoms, some developed oedema, hypertension, and albuminuria during the premenstruum, with spontaneous improvement during menstruation. This appeared to be analogous to the spontaneous resolution of oedema, hypertension, and albuminuria following delivery. Furthermore, if symptoms remain untreated either in premenstrual syndrome or in toxaemia both diseases may culminate in fits, epileptic in the one case, eclamptic in the other. In an earlier investigation one of the reasons for using progesterone in the treatment of premenstrual syndrome had been that some patients suffering from this condition were symptom-free during pregnancy. It was considered that the corpus luteum and placenta supplied enough progesterone during pregnancy to keep these patients symptom-free. Others were not only unrelieved of their premenstrual symptoms during pregnancy, but, as already indicated, developed symptoms closely resembling those of the premenstruum and culminating in toxaemia. It was therefore thought possible that the development of toxaemia might in such cases arise from failure of the corpus luteum and placenta to produce sufficient progesterone. In the light of similarities between premenstrual syndrome and toxaemia, and the fact that treatment of the former with progesterone not only relieved the symptoms (Greene and Dalton, 1953) but also prevented the development of edema, hypertension, and albuminuria in the premenstruum (Dalton, 1954, 1955), it was decided to carry out a trial, employing large doses of progesterone in patients disclosing early minor symptoms of toxaemia, in an attempt to arrest full development of that condition.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of prophylactic vaginal progesterone in decreasing preterm birth rate in a high-risk population. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study included 142 high-risk singleton pregnancies. Progesterone (100 mg) or placebo was administered daily by vaginal suppository and all patients underwent uterine contraction monitoring with an external tocodynamometer once a week for 60 minutes, between 24 and 34 weeks of gestation. Progesterone (n = 72) and placebo (n = 70) groups were compared for epidemiologic characteristics, uterine contraction frequency, and incidence of preterm birth. Data were compared by chi(2) analysis and Fisher exact test. The preterm birth rate was 21.1% (30/142). Differences in uterine activity were found between the progesterone and placebo groups (23.6% vs 54.3%, respectively; P <.05) and in preterm birth between progesterone and placebo (13.8% vs 28.5%, respectively; P <.05). More women were delivered before 34 weeks in the placebo group (18.5%) than in the progesterone group (2.7%) (P <.05). Prophylactic vaginal progesterone reduced the frequency of uterine contractions and the rate of preterm delivery in women at high risk for prematurity.
Treatment with vaginal progesterone reduces the risk of miscarriage and preterm birth in selected high-risk women. The hypothesis that vaginal progesterone can reduce the risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) is unexplored. To summarise the evidence on the effectiveness of vaginal progesterone to reduce the risk of HDP.
Search Strategy: We searched Embase (OVID), MEDLINE (OVID), PubMed, CENTRAL and clinicaltrials.gov from inception until 20 June 2023.
Selection Criteria: We included placebo-controlled randomised trials (RCTs) of vaginal progesterone for the prevention or treatment of any pregnancy complications.
Data Collection and Analysis: We extracted absolute event numbers for HDP and pre-eclampsia in women receiving vaginal progesterone or placebo, and meta-analysed the data with a random effects model. We appraised the certainty of the evidence using GRADE methodology. MAIN The quantitative synthesis included 11 RCTs, of which three initiated vaginal progesterone in the first trimester, and eight in the second or third trimesters. Vaginal progesterone started in the first trimester of pregnancy lowered the risk of any HDP (risk ratio [RR] 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-0.93, 2 RCTs, n = 4431 women, I(2) = 0%; moderate-certainty evidence) and pre-eclampsia (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.41-0.92, 3 RCTs, n = 5267 women, I(2) = 0%; moderate-certainty evidence) when compared with placebo. Vaginal progesterone started in the second or third trimesters was not associated with a reduction in HDP (RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.67-2.12, 3 RCTs, n = 1602 women, I(2) = 9%; low-certainty evidence) or pre-eclampsia (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.71-1.31, 5 RCTs, n = 4274 women, I(2) = 0%; low-certainty evidence). Our systematic review found first-trimester initiated vaginal micronised progesterone may reduce the risk of HDP and pre-eclampsia.
Two recently published meta-analyses of controlled trials of a wide variety of progestational agents, used in pregnancy (Daya 1989; Goldstein et al. 1989), prompted this third meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials involving the prophylactic use of a single agent, 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate. Of seven relevant published reports of controlled trials, six had involved women considered to be a high risk of miscarriage or preterm birth. This analysis provides no support for the view that 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate protects against miscarriage, but suggests that it does reduce the occurrence of preterm birth. The latter effect was reflected in a reduced rate of low birthweight babies, but not in a statistically significant reduction in perinatal mortality and morbidity. The difference between this meta-analysis and the two earlier meta-analyses illustrates the problems both of selective sub-grouping and of comprehensive pooling of data from small trials.
PMID 13883256 13883256 DOI 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1962.tb01176.x 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1962.tb01176.x Dalton et al. 1962, Dalton 1962
Cite this article
Dalton, K. (1962). Controlled trials in the prophylactic value of progesterone in the treatment of pre-eclamptic toxaemia. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the British Empire, 69, 463-468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1962.tb01176.x
Dalton K. Controlled trials in the prophylactic value of progesterone in the treatment of pre-eclamptic toxaemia. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp. 1962;69:463-468. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1962.tb01176.x
Dalton, K. "Controlled trials in the prophylactic value of progesterone in the treatment of pre-eclamptic toxaemia." The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the British Empire, vol. 69, 1962, pp. 463-468.