Diagnostics Ultrasound

Inability of sonography to detect imminent ovulation

Zandt-Stastny D, Thorsen MK, Middleton WD, Aiman J, Zion A, McAsey M, Harms L

Published January 1989 AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology, 152(1), 91-95
DOI 10.2214/ajr.152.1.91 PMID 2642364

Abstract

Sonographic visualization of the cumulus oophorus or of morphologic alterations in the wall of the dominant follicle have been reported to be reliable signs of imminent ovulation when conventional transabdominal sonography is used. To determine if transvaginal sonography could allow a more frequent and confident prediction of imminent ovulation, we prospectively monitored 22 ovulatory menstrual cycles in four women undergoing artificial insemination and in 13 normally menstruating volunteers. Scanning was done on alternate days in the periovulatory period; a 7.5-MHz transvaginal transducer was used. Despite the improved resolution obtained with transvaginal sonography, confident identification of the cumulus oophorus or of mural changes in the follicle was not possible in any of the cycles followed. No other consistent follicular characteristic predicted imminent ovulation. We conclude that confident prediction of imminent ovulation is not possible with sonographic analysis.

Read the guide

  • Fertility Awareness Methods Compared

    Clinician-reviewed comparison of fertility awareness-based methods (Billings, Creighton, Sensiplan, Marquette, Standard Days, apps). Every effectiveness figure cited and labeled by metric.

    30 min read

Topics

Related research

Diagnostics › Ultrasound › Follicular Monitoring · Menstrual Cycle › Cycle Biomarkers › Hormonal Markers · Fertility Awareness › Effectiveness › Fertile Window Estimation
PMID 2642364 2642364 DOI 10.2214/ajr.152.1.91 10.2214/ajr.152.1.91 Zandt-Stastny et al. 1989, Zandt-Stastny 1989