A system capable of ambulatory home monitoring of uterine activity and data transmission was evaluated in a group of pregnant patients. The evaluation focused on three questions: 1) Is the information as reliable as that obtained by the current stationary monitors; 2) Does the information obtained by the tested system relate to that obtained by direct intrauterine pressure measurements; and 3) Is the system simple enough to be used by the unsupervised gravida at home? The results indicate that the tested system can provide reliable information about uterine activity in ambulatory patients. A good correlation between the intensity of contractions and the recording of uterine activity by this system could be demonstrated, particularly in the presence of mild to moderate contractions. The tested monitor proved to be simple to use even in the untrained gravida. Additional studies to determine the role of ambulatory home monitoring of uterine activity in patients with cervical cerclage, placenta previa, and preterm labor will need to be performed to establish its role in current obstetric practice.
ambulatory home uterine activity monitoring pregnancy, home tocodynamometry uterine contraction monitoring system, Katz Gill ambulatory uterine activity monitoring, remote uterine monitoring data transmission preterm labor, intrauterine pressure measurement ambulatory correlation, home monitoring cervical cerclage placenta previa preterm labor, uterine contraction intensity ambulatory recording, portable uterine activity monitor gravida evaluation, telemetry uterine contractions home monitoring obstetric, preterm labor surveillance home uterine monitoring system
Cite this article
Katz, M., & Gill, P. J. (1985). Initial evaluation of an ambulatory system for home monitoring and transmission of uterine activity data. Obstetrics and gynecology, 66(2), 273-277.
Katz M, Gill PJ. Initial evaluation of an ambulatory system for home monitoring and transmission of uterine activity data. Obstet Gynecol. 1985;66(2):273-277.
Katz, Michael, and Pamela J. Gill. "Initial evaluation of an ambulatory system for home monitoring and transmission of uterine activity data." Obstetrics and gynecology, vol. 66, no. 2, 1985, pp. 273-277.
Home uterine activity monitoring has been described as an effective means of detecting uterine contractions, but controversy exists whether it is home uterine activity monitoring or increased nursing support in conjunction with it that contributes to earlier detection of preterm labor. In this study 377 women at risk for preterm labor from three centers were prospectively, randomly assigned to high-risk prenatal care alone (not monitored) or to the same care with twice-daily home uterine activity monitoring without increased nursing support (monitored). The two groups were medically and demographically similar at entry into the study. Routine visits, nonroutine visits, and gestational age at diagnosis of preterm labor were similar in both groups. Preterm labor occurred in 41 of 198 monitored and 39 of 179 not monitored patients. Mean cervical dilatation was 1.4 cm in 41 monitored compared with 2.5 cm for 37 not monitored (p = 0.0006); 73.1% of monitored and 27.5% of not monitored had preterm labor detected before 2 cm dilatation (p = 0.00009). Neonatal outcome of singleton pregnancies showed greater birth weight, fewer days in the neonatal intensive care unit, and fewer babies requiring oxygen therapy and mechanical ventilation in the monitored group. The better outcomes are probably due to the increased likelihood of diagnosis of preterm labor before advanced cervical dilatation with home uterine activity monitoring, thus providing the clinician with a better chance to initiate tocolytic therapy directed at improving pregnancy outcome.
EndometriosisFertility OutcomesEndometriosis Surgery ClaimsReproductive Treatment Access
For many patients with endometriosis, laparoscopic surgery is the most effective treatment to alleviate severe chronic pelvic pain and improve quality of life. Because endometriosis is common among individuals with infertility, surgery is often considered alongside fertility evaluation and treatment to manage symptoms, identify disease pathology, and restore pelvic anatomy. In patients who desire pregnancy, the decision of whether and when to pursue surgery should be guided by clear medical indications and shared decision making between the patient and their obstetrician-gynecologist. In recent months, however, religious and political groups have sought to reframe this medical decision as an ideologic and moral one, advocating for endometriosis surgery in nearly all patients with infertility and claiming that this can eliminate the need for assisted reproductive technologies. This framework, known as restorative reproductive medicine (RRM), aligns with efforts to promote the "personhood" of fertilized eggs, restrict access to in in vitro fertilization (IVF), and advance endometriosis surgery and lifestyle modifications as "root-cause treatment leading to natural fertility." Recent editorials and issue briefs in the obstetrics and gynecology literature have discussed the serious ethical, medical, and policy implications of RRM, yet there remains an urgent need to address specifically the unfounded claims about endometriosis surgery and its purported advantages over assisted reproductive technology. This article examines the social context of this controversy and reviews the current evidence regarding the indications, benefits, and limitations of endometriosis surgery in the management of infertility. In contrast to RRM's assertions, no evidence supports the adoption of endometriosis surgery as a replacement for IVF or as a primary treatment for infertility. Rather, the role of surgery in fertility care is highly nuanced and depends on each patient's clinical presentation, reproductive goals, and personal priorities.
To assess the Pearl Index for risk of ectopic pregnancy in women using levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systems (LNG-IUS) with hormonal reservoirs of 13.5 mg, 19.5 mg, or 52 mg. This was a retrospective cohort study. Women diagnosed with an ectopic pregnancy in Stockholm County, Sweden, between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2019, were identified through the electronic medical record system. The final analysis included 2,252 cases of ectopic pregnancy. Information on age, reproductive and medical history, as well as current use of contraception was retrieved. The time of intrauterine device (IUD) insertion before ectopic pregnancy and the numbers of sold LNG-IUS during the study period were used to calculate the incidence rate for ectopic pregnancy during use per 100 woman-years (Pearl Index). Among women with an ectopic pregnancy diagnosis, 105 presented with a known type of hormonal IUD in situ, of whom 94 were included in the calculations of the Pearl Index. The estimated Pearl Index for ectopic pregnancy was 0.136 (95% CI 0.106-0.176) for the LNG-IUS 13.5-mg, 0.037 (95% CI 0.021-0.067) for the LNG-IUS 19.5-mg, and 0.009 (95% CI 0.006-0.014) for the LNG-IUS 52-mg. With the 52-mg LNG-IUS as referent, the relative risk (RR) for ectopic pregnancy was higher during the first year for LNG 13.5-mg (RR 20.59, 95% CI 12.04-35.21), and for both 13.5-mg (RR 14.49, 95% CI 9.01-23.3) and 19.5-mg (RR 4.44, 95% CI 1.64-12.00) during the total study period. The absolute risk of ectopic pregnancy during the use of LNG-IUS at any doses was low. The results show that the lower the dose of the IUD, the higher the risk of an ectopic pregnancy. Higher-dose LNG-IUS should be considered when providing contraceptive counseling to a woman with known risk factors for ectopic pregnancy who are considering a hormonal IUD.